Re: v2.2.36 to v2.3.8 maildirlock bug

2019-12-06 Thread Martynas Bendorius via dovecot
Hello, Aki created this patch a while ago: http://files1.directadmin.com/services/custombuild/patches/maildirlock-crash.patch It works perfectly to fix the issue :) Regarding dsync - I don't think it's a good replacement in all the cases, is it? We use maildirlock extensively for compression

director option

2019-12-06 Thread soumitri--- via dovecot
Hi, I think option-2 below seems better or am I missing something with director concept. 1. As director and back-end in same server (broken) not recommended, I need minimum 4 servers (2 for director, 2 back-end IMAP). Indexes and mail must be in NFS shared storage(not optimal), as a user

Re: v2.2.36 to v2.3.8 maildirlock bug

2019-12-06 Thread Stephan Bosch via dovecot
On 22/10/2019 05:44, lty--- via dovecot wrote: Dear all,   Dovecot upgraded from v2.2.36 to v2.3.8 There is no problem with the configuration, but the lock directory seems to have an error. [root@spam dovecot]# /usr/libexec/dovecot/maildirlock /path/to/maildir 1 Panic: BUG: No IOs or

Re: IMAP session hangs on 8k-long commands if COMPRESS=DEFLATE is enabled

2019-12-06 Thread Stephan Bosch via dovecot
On 13/11/2019 00:22, Guilhem Moulin via dovecot wrote: Hi there, Dovecot 2.3.7 appears to hang when the client sends a long command after enabling the IMAP COMPRESS extension [RFC 4978]. PoC script attached along with the doveconf(1) output. Without COMPRESS=DEFLATE, and with the default

Re: lmtp proxy 'Invalid FROM: Missing domain'

2019-12-06 Thread Stephan Bosch via dovecot
On 24/11/2019 19:55, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: If I add a domain, error changes in: connection.c: line 380 (connection_update_properties): assertion failed: (conn->remote_port != 0) -Original Message- Subject: lmtp proxy 'Invalid FROM: Missing domain' Looks like I have a

Re: Dovecot & OAuth

2019-12-06 Thread mizuki via dovecot
Great, thank you so much Aki! Please let me know when the fix is available and I will help test in our environment. We'd really like to enable this feature. Thanks again. Mizuki On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:54 PM Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > It seems there is a bug in the oauth2 driver, it loads the

Re: LMTP-Process stays in RCPT TO state

2019-12-06 Thread Stephan Bosch via dovecot
On 06/12/2019 11:08, Pascal Christen via dovecot wrote: Hi I tried to get some logs: https://pastebin.com/Z8xVzpzW As you can see the process isn't shutdown and still in transaction as long dovecot is running. It destroyed the transaction when I stopped Dovecot. And this behavior only

Re: Dovecot & OAuth

2019-12-06 Thread Aki Tuomi via dovecot
Hi! It seems there is a bug in the oauth2 driver, it loads the cert files wrong way. I'll make an internal bug report of this. Aki > On 06/12/2019 16:42 mizuki wrote: > > > Hi, > > For troubleshooting purposes, I change the read/write permissions on the > certs and confirmed 'dovecot' can

Re: Problem With Quota Dovecot

2019-12-06 Thread Gter Marcelo via dovecot
>> Are you using LDA/LMTP to deliver messages to the inbox? Not use LDA in dovecot, i'm running Dovecot with protocols imap pop3 lmtp One thing, curious in accounts with problem with quota : i deleting dovecot index and ran one force-resync and him crashed and return segmentation fault I

Re: Sieve redirect does not collect the sendmail child process correctly (Dovecot 2.3.4.1, Pigeonhole 0.5.4)

2019-12-06 Thread Stephan Bosch via dovecot
On 03/11/2019 18:01, Delian Krustev via dovecot wrote: On Saturday, November 2, 2019 10:40:45 PM EET Stephan Bosch wrote: I think we already know about this issue (tracked as DOP-942). It apparently happens because qmail masks the SIGCHLD signal while Dovecot doesn't unmask it before

Unsubscribe

2019-12-06 Thread Carla Tironi Farinati via dovecot
Unsubscribe El vie., 6 de diciembre de 2019 11:32, ratatouille via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> escribió: > Hello! > > dovecot --version 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > > I defined a sievefilter > > require ["copy"]; > # rule:[weiterleitung] > if header :contains "to" "u...@bitclusive.de" > { >

Re: Problem with sievefilter forwarding

2019-12-06 Thread ratatouille via dovecot
ratatouille via dovecot schrieb am 06.12.19 um 15:32:03 Uhr: > Hello! > > dovecot --version 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > > I defined a sievefilter > > require ["copy"]; > # rule:[weiterleitung] > if header :contains "to" "u...@bitclusive.de" > { > redirect :copy "otheru...@gmail.com"; >

Problem with sievefilter forwarding

2019-12-06 Thread ratatouille via dovecot
Hello! dovecot --version 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) I defined a sievefilter require ["copy"]; # rule:[weiterleitung] if header :contains "to" "u...@bitclusive.de" { redirect :copy "otheru...@gmail.com"; stop; } It doesn't work and I don't know why. I can define a vacationfilter that

ACL: dovecot-acl-list and acl_globals_only

2019-12-06 Thread Peter Chiochetti via dovecot
Reword of attempt from last week, also workaround/possible culprit found: In dovecot 2.2.22 the stanza "* group=Guest" in the global ACL vfile did stop dovecot from showing anybody in group "Guest" any mailbox but INBOX in imap LIST command. So I had to grant lookup right extra, eg. "Sent

Re: v2.3.9 released

2019-12-06 Thread Tom Sommer via dovecot
On 2019-12-04 11:34, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: + Add lmtp_add_received_header setting. It can be used to prevent LMTP   from adding "Received:" headers. Thank you for this :) -- Tom

Re: LMTP-Process stays in RCPT TO state

2019-12-06 Thread Pascal Christen via dovecot
Hi I tried to get some logs: https://pastebin.com/Z8xVzpzW As you can see the process isn't shutdown and still in transaction as long dovecot is running. It destroyed the transaction when I stopped Dovecot. And this behavior only happens when the mailbox of user is full... Any Ideas how to

Re: Problem With Quota Dovecot

2019-12-06 Thread Alex JOST via dovecot
Am 05.12.2019 um 14:51 schrieb Gter Marcelo via dovecot: Hi Dear, I running the command bellow and quota fix for some hours, but after 4 ou 5 hours de quota back return the % wrong. Same after 100% the size in MAILDIR quota return 45% used only again. Are you using LDA/LMTP to deliver