> "David" == David Favor writes:
David> At one point seems like I found a write up in the Dovecot docs
David> about having Dovecot directly listen on port 25 using
David> Opportunistic TLS along with port 587 authentication, so only
David> Dovecot was required to handle incoming email.
Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 18/04/2020 17:45 David Favor wrote:
At one point seems like I found a write up in
the Dovecot docs about having Dovecot directly
listen on port 25 using Opportunistic TLS along
with port 587 authentication, so only Dovecot was
required to handle incoming email.
Said
> On 18/04/2020 17:45 David Favor wrote:
>
>
> At one point seems like I found a write up in
> the Dovecot docs about having Dovecot directly
> listen on port 25 using Opportunistic TLS along
> with port 587 authentication, so only Dovecot was
> required to handle incoming email.
>
> Said
On 2020-04-18 16:45, David Favor wrote:
If I'm remembering correctly, someone point me
to the correct docs for this setup.
courier-mta maybe ?
is the only one in one, i know of, one day dovecot will possible be
there :=)
back to netscape, could not resists
At one point seems like I found a write up in
the Dovecot docs about having Dovecot directly
listen on port 25 using Opportunistic TLS along
with port 587 authentication, so only Dovecot was
required to handle incoming email.
Said another way, no requirement for Sendmail,
or Postfix or EXIM.
> On 17. Apr 2020, at 20.05, Maciek Jackowski wrote:
>
> Hi welcome
>
> I want to set some virtual users with sdbox mail_location
> so I return in
> password_query and user_query extra field mail
> which contains
>
