If it's less than 64 bits number and Dovecot is compiled as 64bit
binary, I guess it should work. Otherwise it gets more or less random:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/file/17aac21b303d/src/lib-storage/index/maildir/maildir-filename.c#l117
That explains it. Thanks.
t possible for IMAP to run
seive on it when it migrates the files from new to cur and indexes them?
I understand that this might not be a valid question as mail is
delivered already so there is nothing to filter :-)
-Akash
lower mtime,
fourth by copying them into "new" in proper ascending sequence
(according to file name) and then giving them appropriate mtime related
to their sequence. But no matter what i do, Dovecot assigns first UID to
file 1494829006737776656 only.
-Akash
Does this patch will need to reindex lucene ?
Yes, unfortunately, it does.
Phil
Just confirming that the patch has solved it. Thanks. Though it was just
a tiny glitch, it prevented so many mails from showing in the search
results. And I feel even Solr will require re-indexing.
Thanks for the report. Bug found. My bad. A patch is working its way
through the internal process, and will be in the public tree soon.
Cheers,
Phil
That was fast :-) Thanks. Will wait for the patch.
Tried latest source from HG and with solr also apart from lucene which I
tested previously. The problem with single quotes in HTML is still
there.
The revision:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/ad028a950248
should have solved it but the relevant code no longer exists in
The issue is probably linked to:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2014-May/024462.html
But that change-set was in 2014 and I am using Dovecot 2.2.19 so don't
understand why I am still seeing this behavior.
-Akash
ent/type header removed):
-
From: y...@yourself.com
To: m...@myself.com
Subject: Test Message
ABCD 1234
-
RESULT: OK. The email is found.
What could be the reason for this?
-Akash
ndexFileNames::FIELDS_INDEX_EXTENSION).c_str() )' failed.
Aborted
I am using dovecot 2:2.2.19-1~auto+7& libclucene-core1:i386 2.3.3.4-4
from debian wheezy backports. Please advice.
-Akash
? Please help me through these confusions..
-Regards,
Akash
/febedba15c7e
That bug was actually already in v2.1, but because memory was always
allocated from stack it wasn't causing as many problems.
On 18 Aug 2014, at 13:34, Akash akbwiz+dove...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for checking. The patch didn't make any significant difference. Now
its 1.3G
Please ignore. This seems to be a issue with using indexes created by
Dovecot v1 with v2. When I deleted the old indexes and created fresh
with v2, results were as expected.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:16, Akash akbwiz+dove...@gmail.com
2500 1.5G Aug 18 06:41 _5g.cfs
-rw--- 1 2500 2500 20 Aug 18 06:41 segments.gen
-rw--- 1 2500 2500 46 Aug 18 06:41 segments_az
390M vs 1.5G. That is a huge difference in size. Why is that?
Thanks in advance.
-Regards,
Akash
(fingers crossed).
Previously I tried binary packages from your own repo also:
http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.2/
But that exhibited even stranger behavior:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-August/097362.html
-Regards,
Akash
On 18-08-2014 14:29, Timo Sirainen
nobody nogroup 46 Aug 18 11:30 segments_8n
On 18-08-2014 14:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18 Aug 2014, at 09:42, Akash akbwiz+dove...@gmail.com wrote:
390M vs 1.5G. That is a huge difference in size. Why is that?
Can you test if the attached patch shrinks it back? I had been
planning on making
)
# dovecot --version
2.2.13
Please help..
-Thanks,
Akash
,
Akash
Content-type as text/html.
Thus if a mail is like this:
Content-Type: text/html
bHe is very good./b
It isn't shown in search by the squat indexes created using dovecot
v2.2.13. I have done further testing on some sample emails which confirmed
this behavior.
Why is this so?
-Regards,
Akash
18 matches
Mail list logo
