Thanks for your reply.
You got me thinking towards the antispam plugin which I have nto used
before, but can you elaborate if my users are system users and the
training is done only via a cron entry?
Andreas
On 03/04/15 16:27, Gedalya wrote:
On 04/03/2015 06:13 AM, Andreas Kasenides wrote
is not such a great option.Am I missing something? I tried
googling for info but nothing substantial turned up.
Thanks.
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
(5B4ANK)
this forum to learn about Dovecot, not to listen to the
rantings of a few Testosterone poisoned, immature posters.
Please share. I know its easy to do, but share anyway!
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
(5B4ANK)
On 26/03/15 13:05, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects
loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad
OX-AG is a large corporation?
Did I miss something
I hate to have started this, especially the sister thread that has
dissented into a flame war of what is OSS.
Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money on
ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put
efforts into a project when there is no
-open-source-messaging-software-provider/
http://www.open-xchange.com/dovecot
http://www.open-xchange.com/announcements/18
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
(5B4ANK)
!
Thanks for all the the good work you and your associates are doing.
For us in the education sector and with dwindling money supplies you are
a life saver. Thanks.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
(5B4ANK)
basis in case of
software changes.
Your input will be appreciated.
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
(5B4ANK)
I am trying to find out how Dovecot behaves when there are multiple
quota roots.
I could not find something authoritative on this.
For example, on a nicely running server that used fs quota I now have in
90-quota.conf
plugin {
quota = fs:Mail Quota:user:mount=/Mail
quota2 = maildir:Mail
On 31-08-2014 16:12, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de wrote:
* Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de:
I have home=/srv/mail/%2NLn/%2.16NLn/%Ln/ in my auth-ldap.conf.ext
and
this gives me a path like this: /srv/mail/0/08/myusername
I use version 2.2.13 of dovecot.
I'm on 2.1.17
Can somebody please verify that currently (v 2.2.9) SMTP AUTH using SASL
from Postfix with Dovecot proxy is still not supported as discussed in
these threads
(especially the first one)?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-August/067977.html
the front end Postfix
authenticate on the
Dovecot back-end by setting it up to talk to the auth process via an
ip-listener
ALSO on just one IP port.
Does this make sense? AM I missing something?
Andreas
On 17-12-2013 14:48, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
Can somebody please verify that currently (v 2.2.9
Hello everybody.
Sorry if this has been answered before, I just could not find any info.
Just point me if that is so.
Can somebody please explain why there is no option --with-quota (ot may
be --with-fs-quota)
for the configure command?
As it stands now, at least for the fs back-end the
On 26-11-2013 22:39, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 11/26/2013 3:27 PM, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On trying to compile pigeonhole-0.4.2 on Dovecot 2.2.7 on a CentOS 6.4
machine
Linux xxx.xxx 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 16 23:51:20
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
with ./configure
On 27-11-2013 18:59, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
Sorry if this has been answered before, I just could not find any
info. Just point me if that is so.
Can somebody please explain why there is no option
On trying to compile pigeonhole-0.4.2 on Dovecot 2.2.7 on a CentOS 6.4
machine
Linux xxx.xxx 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 16 23:51:20 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
with ./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/local/lib/dovecot
I get the following error:
/bin/sh
Since this, it seems, was lost in, the now infamous, 2.2.9 thread I
would like to resubmit the following proposal for Timo's consideration.
Thanks Timo for doing an excellent job. I believe that the following
will add further value to Dovecot in the long run.
Thankx
Andreas
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html
Pigeonhole
On 23-11-2013 19:56, Luuk wrote:
On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any
official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most
I second this and offer my
On 02-09-2013 07:04, Kai Hendry wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:37:04AM +0300, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
IIUC Postfix places by default mail in /var/mail/%u as an mbox.
sg:/etc/postfix$ sudo postconf | grep mail_spool
mail_spool_directory = /var/mail
I think the solution from looking around
On 31-08-2013 13:07, Kai Hendry wrote:
However I found /usr/share/doc/dovecot/example-config/conf.d/ a little
scary, since I like to have my configs as minimalistic as possible,
e.g.
I suggest you forget all the options and concentrate on the ones you
intend to use.
Dovecot has defaults
On 31-05-2013 12:57, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Romer Ventura schrieb:
Scenario1: This should allow any to lose any of the servers and
clients
still have access to their emails (although I am not sure how the
indexes
would react to this and sudden disconnection)
- 2 Dovecot Proxy
I am actually going through the first stages of implementing your
Scenario1.
There is small difference: there will also be 2*Postfix relays also on
the
Dovecot Proxies. This allows placing them in a DMZ such that the real
Dovecot/Postfix servers are placed away from the WAN.
After much arguing
Look at Running Multiple Invocations of Dovecot at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot
Andreas
On 23-05-2013 03:30, Joshua Gardner wrote:
I want to know if there is any virtual server functionality in
Dovecot?
I would like to have two separate configurations, that access the
same
email,
On 12-04-2013 20:33, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.0.tar.gz.sig
Everything now seems to be stable and working in v2.2, so I can
finally
move onto developing great new interesting features for v2.3. :)
meanwhile.
Before looking deeper into this: Does anyone here know if this option
is known to work, or not?
We're running dovecot 2.1.7 on debian wheezy.
Removing unwanted attachments is a nice way to keep mail archives
smaller...
Thanks,
MJ
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept
believe these are related to the above Dovecot error since they happens
together.
Is this a Dovecot problem?
Config attached.
Thanx
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
Dept. of Computer Science,
University of Cyprus
Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701
# 2.2.beta1: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS
: quota-fs:
host=..ucy.xx.cy, path=/mail, uid=211, bytes
Nov 21 19:24:22 iolaos dovecot: imap(user): Debug: quota-fs: uid=211,
value=2779115520, limit=8388608000
I am using (testing) version 2.2alpha1.
Thankx.
--
Andreas Kasenides
Senior IT Officer
University of Cyprus, Dept. of Computer
28 matches
Mail list logo
