On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 8.53, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the
details, but here are things I'm interested in:
1. Replacing libc-client's use as a client library
..
I envision creating libdovecot-c
Hi all Dovecotters,
Lots of programs (e.g, PHP) link to a library called c-client, which is
a derivative of the original IMAP implementation, UW IMAP.
(For those new to UW IMAP, read here: http://www.washington.edu/imap/ )
UW IMAP is not in as much of active development as it used to be, so I
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.2.2012, at 21.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've anyway done several fixes in v2.1. Can you try if these problems
happen with it too? And in any case cleanup the dbox from the *.broken
files, so that doveadm force-resync won't give any errors.
A bit
I'm using dsync to synchronize emails on a laptop where wifi connectivity
sometimes fails in the middle of a sync. I have a shell script that runs
dsync, and here is one line of it including the output of dsync:
+ dsync -f -m realmail mirror /home/paulproteus/projects/ssh-attach/run ssh
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.12.2011, at 20.31, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Hi Dovecot peeps,
I'm enjoying running /usr/lib/dovecot/imap directly as a PREAUTH IMAP pipe.
I find that it outputs log messages whose severity is INFO to stdout. I'm
running it as follows
Hi Dovecot peeps,
I'm enjoying running /usr/lib/dovecot/imap directly as a PREAUTH IMAP pipe.
I find that it outputs log messages whose severity is INFO to stdout. I'm
running it as follows:
/usr/lib/dovecot/imap -c /tmp/dovecot.conf
and I see the following messages output to
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.5.2011, at 23.43, upen wrote:
If maildir support in alpine does not work like it does for mbox then
I'll have to configure IMAP setings in pine.conf for alpine users. I
must say that alpine is installed on mail server :). Although IMAP
setting may
Hi Timo (and all!),
Venaktesh is a friend of mine working on a patch to the venerable Alpine
mail reader so it can read Maildir format mailboxes on disk.
Venkatesh wanted to know if he could use some code from Dovecot's
lib-storage (safely opening/reading Maildirs, including accounting for
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Rick Romero wrote:
So I'm left with a quandry. I guess the simple question is, Should mail
in cur, EVER not have a flag? I suppose if it were marked as UNSEEN
after being SEEN, that's possible. So I just answered myself there :)
Just SELECTing a mailbox causes Dovecot
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Replication is still on my TODO list and I've a bit of code for the
replication plugin implemented, but it's not very far. Anyway since I
now started working for Mailtrust they'll decide what the priorities are
for new Dovecot features. I can't say for
I remember last year we discussed Dovecot replication a bit on this list,
e.g. http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-May/030446.html .
Has there been any development related to this, and can I help at all? The
more I think about the hacks I'm employing to synchronize mail, the more I
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if it's possible to subscribe to a folder that is
on a read only File System ?
We have a snapshot mechanism that create a .snapshot directly in the
user folder. This is done by our NAS and we would like to give an
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Dan Roberts wrote:
It was quickly pointed out that my system was set up to use MBOX and not
MAILDIR, and some helpful links and notes were sent back and forth
giving me a good clue as to how to perform the conversion process.
I did have success in getting my mail
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
How large is your INBOX? Unless you've disabled index files the threading
should go pretty fast even for thousands of messages.
(now it's archive and Lists that are so big)
ca. 100K messages
But if it really is because of THREAD, you're in luck. I've
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Other programs have their own built-in values/parameters for timeouts,
which makes sense as one program's typical timeout needs may be quite
different from another one. So, each program should at least have a few
*configurable* parameters that control
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hmm. Or v1.2 has virtual mailboxes - you could create a single virtual
mailbox from all your other mailboxes and then search it. I think if
Squat is enabled it'll create a single index from all the mails. I'm not
sure if I want to leave it like that
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Imobach González Sosa wrote:
There's no problem in disallowing the users to update the Seen flag.
What I want is that every user have their own Seen flags.
Timo and others will know more; but for me, I would just deliver the
messages to multiple people and see that
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can you somehow enable C99 support for xlc? Is there something like a
-c99 parameter?
P.S. Is it possible to just try installing the GNU Compiler
Collection, and then compiling with GCC on your platform?
-- Asheesh.
--
Hiccuping trembling into
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Kaushal Gandhi wrote:
Hello,
I have installed dovecot Version 1.0.14 on Centos Linux 4.6.
When I do ./configure --with-pam, I get below mentioned error.
Download the OpenSSL development packages for your distribution. My guess
is openssl-devel but I don't use CentOS.
I'm running 1.1 rc8, and I enabled the Lucene indexes.
I find that if a bunch of messages arrive in INBOX and I then move them to
archive, the next time I do an X-TEXT-FAST search, Dovecot has to re-index
the mails that I think it had indexed when they were in INBOX.
This seems silly, since
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Diego Liziero wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:34 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
mbox messages get header corruption caused by an extra linefeed after
Content-Length
Fixed:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Timo Sirainen schreef:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig
Previous managesieve wont compile against rc6, so I made a quick new release
(expecting rc7 to arrive soon):
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Ben Budts wrote:
Hi there,
I use dovecot-1.1-rc4, got imap, imaps, pop3 pop3s working fine with the mbox
format.
I use sendmail-8.14.2 as an MTA, sendmail uses procmail as an LDA.
Does it run it as the user in question, or as root?
I migrated to maildir format now,
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Anil wrote:
I am fairly new to dovecot...
I had a user who in outlook tried to move one of the folders into
another folder but it crapped out.
I kind of fear that Outlook sent the wrong IMAP commands. Can you
reproduce this and keep a Dovecot rawlog of the IMAP
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Anders wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Anders wrote:
We have a few users that every so often get empty data in their
message
overview. From and subject are empty, and the date is 1-Jan-1970. When
opening the message in full view, all things are
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Steve Roemen wrote:
/ I'm testing a new setup of postfix using deliver to put the messages
into the user's maildir, and am curious if there is a way to make
deliver create custom maildirs when it delivers to a valid user without
a maildir?
I don't know as far as deliver,
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ed W wrote:
I currently use a small self written proxy app which does some simple
analysis of what imap client is talking and does some prefetching via
pipelined commands to reduce latency and also sets up a compressed pipe back
to the server. Even over broadband it gives
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Something came up that Confounded problems in my move from UW-imap to
dovecot. I found a problem with the new icedove update in Debian lenny when
moving from 1.5.0.13+1.5.0.14b.dfsg1-0etch1 to 2.0.0.9-3 that could look like
a dovecot issue. Icedove
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'll probably be implementing multi-master replication this summer. My
previous thoughts about it are here:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-December/027284.html
Below is a description of how the replication protocol will probably
work. It should
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Tim Riley wrote:
dovecot version: 1.0.13 (RPM from http://atrpms.net/)
protocol: IMAP
dovecot -n:
# 1.0.13: /etc/dovecot.conf
log_path: /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
listen: *removed*
ssl_cert_file: /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem
ssl_key_file:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching actions (happens
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Wouter Amsterdam wrote:
if address :is to user@ mydomain.nl {
Is this space intentional? useratspacemydomain.nl?
-- Asheesh.
--
In the long run, every program becomes rococo, and then rubble.
-- Alan Perlis
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, this does not seem to be over, yet. I have a script in the
right place now, it is set as Active, but it does not seem to be doing
anything. That is, everything is still going to the INBOX instead of to
the designated directories, and
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Thing wrote:
So maybe dovecot.index.cache became corrupt?
Hmm! Perhaps you should still upgrade, then.
-- Asheesh.
--
The last person who said that (God rest his soul) lived to regret it.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Cam Ellison wrote:
This is a Debian lenny/sid installation. Dovecot has been installed on it
for over a year, with no problems. Lately (i.e. the past few months), if I
attempt to read a message, Icedove crashes. It does not do this when I read
a message downloaded from
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Dien Phan wrote:
We are using a web mail software that allows users to login either as us
'abc' or '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. The problem is: when a user logs in as 'abc' (without
domain part) dovecots creates a directory /var/MailRoot/domains/abc and check
mail there (as I
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Allen Sim wrote:
I am a new linux user.I jz setting up a mail server.Downloaded
Configured the components:CentOS,OpenLDAP,pam,dovecotMailServer,s
endmial,squireelmail etc
Okay.
But wehn i want to check whether it works or not, so i open up my
clientmail, wchi is
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
Last week I announced my automatic Debian repository for dovecot-1.1.
Asheesh Laroia requested source package support and as promised I built
it this weekend. Now that it has succesfully released new packages for
Timo's latest
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Andy Greenwood wrote:
I'm relatively new to Dovecot, but I really like what I'm seeing so far. I
have one problem that I was hoping you could help me with though. I use
Postfix for my mail server, then pass that on to procmail for filtering, and
finally to deliver to put
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Stewart Dean wrote:
Sure it will in your situation...but when you have more than one client going
after the mailbox, they'll step on each other's work n vanilla Dovecot. And
in this case there are at least 2 and as many as 4 or 5 mail clients all open
at the same time
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Diego Liziero wrote:
Perhaps, as it never happened with wu-imap, it could be fixed with
dovecot, too.
The hard part is to understand why it happens.
I wonder if an IMAP trace for a working UW-IMAP setup and the failing
Dovecot setup might help.
-- Asheesh.
--
Satire
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
For those of you who like to live on the edge, there is now a
Debian-testing repository available with hourly updates from recent
Dovecot-1.1 changes in the Mercurial repositories. It automatically
releases a new set of packages
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Steffen Ille wrote:
Dear Listmembers,
I tried to figure out how to get statistics not only about the amount of
mails which where sent from / to my mailusers, but also about the size
in byte (e.g. to compare with other traffic stats) for each of my users.
postfix shows me
My email workflow with Dovecot is that mail gets delivered to INBOX,
where I handle it and then move it into a folder called archive.
I have alpine set to use the Default sort of THREAD of a folder. After
moving a (few) mail(s) from INBOX to archive, archive takes a long time
(10-50s) to
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ben Julian wrote:
All changes resulted in only a brief (1-2hr) cessation of the problem.
I've subscribed for a month or so now and searched the archives, but
if I missed a solution to this in there, I apologize.
That sounds like a drag. Let's see if we can help you.
Can
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Thanks for the information. I have one additional question, it is
probably not a Dovecot question more of a Procmail question. I tried
adding the above code to my /etc/procmailrc file but it did not work. Do
I have to put that code in each users
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or
including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions?
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Patrick wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has IMAP working between Dovecot 1.0.10 and a
Nokia N95 (8GB version with firmware 15.x.x.x)? I've been trying to make
it work using a default Dovecot config but the N95 just hangs when
updating the folder list which has a bunch of
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Feb 23 20:40:36 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username): Raw backtrace:
It looks like you could make this report even more helpful by providing
a single message that reproduces this failure, or by proving a gdb
backtrace as per
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
I just committed the Gentoo ebuild for 1.1.rc1 with sieve and
managesieve support (both since 1.1.beta15):
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/net-mail/dovecot
I've also made available unofficial Debian packages. Note that they don't
have Sieve
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Davi Bariani Boin wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I´m trying to make a work with procmail and deliver on Fedora 7. Part of flow
are the following:
- procmail get the mail from Sendmail
- procmail ask to deliver/dovecot if have any retriction (sizer mailbox, etc)
- procmail put
When I do either:
$ hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/1.1/
or
$ hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/
and cd into the resulting directory (1.1/ or dovecot/) and do
autogen.sh and configure, ./configure tells me at the end:
NOTE: This is the UNSTABLE development branch of Dovecot
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Erin D. Hughes wrote:
Evaggelos Balaskas wrote:
to avoid such problems i simple create a new user with
userdb_mail=maildir and using thunderbird i just copied the emails from
one account to other :)
Thanks Evaggelos for your reply unfortunately I need to convert about
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
I found that compiling the zeroc-ice package (on Debian-based distros),
which is huge, very reliably results in random crashes and aborts when
relevant hardware is dying.
# apt-get source zeroc-ice
# cd zeroc-ice-?.?.?
# make
*blam*
Just to
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
I have a problem and I don't know which part of the mail chain could be
causing it, although dovecot does seem to be the most logical source.
I get multiple copies of messages to my Inbox. I have just deleted 24
copies of a newsletter from Computer
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
For Dovecot, the mailbox index also has to be updated for each deletion,
and while that in itself is not terribly expensive per message, it has
to be done one message at a time to maintain consistency between the
index and the real mail.
In general,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
At 6:32 PM -0800 1/29/08, Asheesh Laroia imposed structure on a stream
of electrons, yielding:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
For Dovecot, the mailbox index also has to be updated for each
deletion, and while that in itself is not terribly
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The
dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns
Can you try upgrading to a more recent Dovecot? 1.0.10 is the current
stable release.
-- Asheesh.
--
Why does New Jersey have more
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Someone Something wrote:
I have a server with dovecot installed with imap and tls working (call
that the remote server). Now I want to have a few computers at the same
place to access the same account on the remote server. I have another
server (call this the local
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Someone Something wrote:
offlineimap looks like it will work. Do you know if it works well on
big changes? I have about 1.5 gigs of email at the local site that will
need to be uploaded to the main server. After its uploaded it will have
to weed through it all during
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Daniel wrote:
Currently, I'm executing deliver from a wrapper script:
# master.cf:
dovecot-lda unix [...] argv=[...]/dovecot-lda_wrapper.pl ${recipient}
That script finds out the username which must be passed to deliver's -d
option, because dovecot's user names are not the
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
In the future, I shall endeavor to look more heavily for the answers before
posting, or at least before assuming that no one on this list is willing to
help. Thank you to all for the help given.
Sure thing. If you have suggestions to improve the
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 9:55 PM, Asheesh Laroia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
I have to admit that I'm not quite sure why no one has responded to me
about this one. If I'm not providing enough information or incorrect
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/9/2008, Asheesh Laroia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Basically - the above is a reason to use 'adduser', not a reason to use
virtual users! If I'm wrong, please clarify my understanding.
My understanding is using Virtual Users is inherently more
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Pascal Volk wrote:
Am 09.01.2008 21:43 schrieb Asheesh Laroia:
Not in the way I was describing:
Let's say some person logs on to your Dovecot-based IMAP service and
figures out how to take over Dovecot to read and modify arbitrary files on
the system. (Timo, I hope
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procmail
and dovecot 1.0 installed on a single partition. I now need to set up
mail quotas for most of the users but not all. Just protecting
/var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME is probably good enough for
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for
delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
Right, that's what I mean -
at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /etc/procmailrc), pipe
the message to
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
I have to admit that I'm not quite sure why no one has responded to me about
this one. If I'm not providing enough information or incorrect information
please tell me. It's quite important that this e-mail system be working.
Well, I can try to help.
I was playing with Dovecot 1.1 full text indexing through Squat in late
October, which was working pretty well. I wanted to ask about this
behavior I had:
When an email arrives in INBOX using procmail (which delivers to my
Maildirs), and I see it in Dovecot, when I next do a search (IMAP
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Dean Brooks wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way, or can a way be added, to add an auth_failed_delay=10s
style option that would put in an artificial delay after a failed
password attempt?
As it stands now, Dovecot seems highly vulnerable to widescale
brute-force password dictionary
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Frank Kintrup wrote:
Is there a way, or can a way be added, to add an
auth_failed_delay=10s style option that would put in an artificial
delay after a failed password attempt?
As it stands now, Dovecot seems highly vulnerable to widescale
brute-force password dictionary
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 14:20:47 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 14:00 -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote:
mail_location: mbox:~/mail/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
..
userdb:
driver: sql
args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-sql.conf
..
Dec
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Daragh Mc Grath wrote:
Hi Guys,
Can anyone shed some light as to how I upgrade away from
1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2 on edgy? The usual aptitude upgrades aren't doing
anything for me, and, downloading the package from another Ubuntu
release, and trying a dpkg -i is causing lots of
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Patrick Milvich wrote:
I've mentioned this before but only heard from one other person who has
experienced this, but it's becoming a pretty serious issue.
The situation:
A spammer sets a bot on a fishing attempt to gain email addresses, causing
numerous login processes
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andre Huebner wrote:
Hello List,
i switched mailformat from mbox to maildir. Now i have a little problem with
procmail/formail and headermanipulation of mails.
Here an example:
0
* ^From.*gmx.de
| (formail -t -Iprocmail: gmx.de) /var/spool/mail/xx
You can ask
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mike McGonagle wrote:
Hello all,
I have been working on getting this machine
Hi, Mike - can you be more specific as to what the problem you're having
is?
-- Asheesh.
--
It's better to burn out than it is to rust.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
When I receive a mail that is addressed to my email address and also
with a cc to a mailinglist I subscribe to, I get two mails, which I
guess is expected... But I have just moved to Dovecot from Cyrus, and
Cyrus seems to know that this is the same
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Harrison Metzger wrote:
Hello,
Where I work we have have an interesting setup, we have 2 machines with mail
accounts on them and both have dovecot. We would really like to centralize
all the mail accounts on one machine, but unfortunately the administration
has not
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Yes I'm using deb. Well to make things easier for you I've just tested
using other email client (Mullberry). Seems Thunderbird screwup
something in encoding (same thing as renaming folders). So that's not
dovecot problem ;).
That's a drag - follow
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Marcelo Iturbe wrote:
112 copy 1:100 toBeProcessed
Connection to host lost.
I keep getting dropped...
Does /var/log/syslog say anything interesting?
-- Asheesh.
--
Real Men don't make backups. They upload it via ftp and let the world mirror
it.
--
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Daniel Watts wrote:
Timo - we were just having a conversation about how we might be able to
provide full body indexed search for our clients and I realised it might
be worth checking the Dovecot list to see if this has been done
already...
And then I find this thread!
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Adam McDougall wrote:
Thanks for this list of steps, I've been intending to test it and was
just about getting ready to ask the same question. Your email would be
mice content to throw on the dovecot wiki under fts (currently empty)
Good point, but you do it, it's
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Matt wrote:
Another annoying thing about Exim is it checks if a user is over
quotta after it has accepted a message. It then trys to write the
message to the users ./new directory and at that point generates a
bounce. Meaning over quotta accounts generate alot of bounces
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 20:07 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Wasted a bit of time getting it to work again. It's horribly inefficient
when saving messages and EXPUNGE seems to be somewhat broken, but at
least it kinda works. :)
I just tried out 1.0beta7 and erased all my indexes and with fts and
fts_squat enabled, and when I SEARCH TEXT in Dovecot, it does *not* find
messages where the thing I SEARCH for appear only in the From: header.
Timo, can you confirm or deny that you still see this behavior? I did
clear my
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I just tried out 1.0beta7
Er, I mean 1.1beta7.
-- Asheesh.
--
The first requisite for immortality is death.
-- Stanislaw Lem
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Tom Sommer wrote:
On Sat, November 3, 2007 22:18, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 14:20 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
After updating Dovecot,
From what version?
I think it's related to the change in the cache files.
I had a customer who couldn't see any mails
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello dovecot users,
Hi Stephan,
Have fun testing the patch. Don't hesitate to notify me when there are
problems.
I've configured horde today and if I try to access managesieve it segfaults.
dovecot-infolog:
dovecot:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Neal Becker wrote:
I tried Imap-Maildir. That was easy to setup without messing up my
existing imap (just use cp -al old-maildir new-maildir). I guess to do
Imap-Imap I could create another user account on my dovecot server
(I'm the only user on that system, it's just
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Well, hg bisect doesn't seem to be helping me find the answer. I fear
that the real problem is in base64_decode, but for now I'm going to
sleep instead of drowsily being confused by a debugger.
For what it's worth,
http://paulproteus.acm.jhu.edu
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I fear that the real problem is in base64_decode, but for now I'm going
to sleep instead of drowsily being confused by a debugger.
When I add the attached patch, which just adds two asserts toward the end
of base64_decode(), I can get base64_decode
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 10:16 -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I fear that the real problem is in base64_decode, but for now I'm
going to sleep instead of drowsily being confused by a debugger.
When I add
The RFC says http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3501.txt this:
TEXT string
Messages that contain the specified string in the header or
body of the message.
But with the current hg tip (see linked rawlogs), SEARCH TEXT provides
results disjoint from SEARCH FROM. I
I did an hg pull; hg update, and now my Dovecot working copy doesn't
build:
../../src/lib-storage/index/dbox/libstorage_dbox.a(dbox-file.o): In
function `dbox_file_metadata_get':
/home/paulproteus/dnlds/dovecot/src/lib-storage/index/dbox/dbox-file.c:820:
undefined reference to
I 'hg pull'ed and now my Dovecot segfaults when I select a particular
folder. I've removed all files with 'index' in the name, so I don't think
it's due to bad indexes.
Oct 21 09:18:40 alchemy dovecot: Dovecot v1.1.beta3 starting up
Oct 21 09:18:47 alchemy dovecot: imap-login:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists) wrote:
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Oct 21 17:19:49 Fatal:
chroot(/users/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) failed: Operation
not permitted
Only programs running as UID 0 (root) are allowed to use the chroot system
call. Does your use of chroot() for
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I 'hg pull'ed and now my Dovecot segfaults when I select a particular folder.
I've removed all files with 'index' in the name, so I don't think it's due to
bad indexes.
I 'hg bisect'ed between 1.1.beta3 and the tip with this as my test:
sh
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I 'hg bisect'ed between 1.1.beta3 and the tip with this as my test:
Actually, now, tip is fixed. Thanks Timo!
-- Asheesh.
--
Teutonic:
Not enough gin.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
