Re: [Dovecot] Comment from OpenLDAP developer regarding deferring operations

2007-04-12 Thread Ben Beuchler
understand it, the search request being sent before the result of the bind request is received could trigger the deferrals. Thanks! -Ben On 4/12/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:50 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote: I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind

Re: [Dovecot] Comment from OpenLDAP developer regarding deferring operations

2007-04-12 Thread Ben Beuchler
On 4/12/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:50 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote: I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per RFC4511 is undefined, since a server

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.rc32 released

2007-04-12 Thread Ben Beuchler
The LDAP_DEPRECATED define should have fixed these. Maybe your ldap.h doesn't have the deprecated functions at all for some reason? Or did I somehow mess up applying the deprecated-patch. :) rc32 builds cleanly for me (only a few minor warnings) and seems to be running well. Thanks! -Ben

Re: [Dovecot] rc31 - deferring operation: binding

2007-04-11 Thread Ben Beuchler
Well, I've really no idea. I know it works for many people and I couldn't get it to break when stress testing with hundreds of connections per second. More info: In the 5 minutes between when Nagios flagged IMAP as down (and we tested it as down) until we restarted Dovecot, 103 authentications

[Dovecot] Comment from OpenLDAP developer regarding deferring operations

2007-04-11 Thread Ben Beuchler
I received this response from a member of the OpenLDAP core team when asking about meaning of the deferred operations I was seeing. Is it possible that this is what I'm seeing, Timo? -Ben - I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on

Re: [Dovecot] rc31 - deferring operation: binding

2007-04-10 Thread Ben Beuchler
Is there anything else in slapd logs? I haven't been able to identify anything of consequence. For example I found this with google: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200507/ msg00063.html Aye, I saw that as well. Unfortunately, Howard points out that the author of that

[Dovecot] TLS handshake errors, frozen IMAP

2007-04-10 Thread Ben Beuchler
Another new issue has cropped up with my rc1 - rc31 upgrade: This morning, right around the typical morning email surge, Dovecot stopped accepting new IMAP connections. I didn't get a chance to do much troubleshooting and a restart of Dovecot fixed it. The only thing I've been able to find in

Re: [Dovecot] rc31 - deferring operation: binding

2007-04-10 Thread Ben Beuchler
The really frustrating thing, of course, is that I really have no proof whatsoever that the occasional auth failures (all authentication attempts hang until Dovecot is restarted) have anything to do with the Sorry; cut myself off. The really frustrating thing, of course, is that I really have

[Dovecot] rc31 - deferring operation: binding

2007-04-09 Thread Ben Beuchler
I hate to bring up anything that might delay 1.0, but the behavior I'm seeing is rather... weird. I'm running rc31, using userdb static and auth_bind=yes. With rc1 (what I had been running) I would occasionally get some deferring operation complaints from LDAP, but very rarely. Every now and