On 2011-03-08 12:00 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
but moving from dovecot 1.10.13 to 2.0.9
First time I thought it was a typo and ignored it...
There has never been a version 1.10.xxx
Maybe you mean 1.0.13?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically
said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CPU...
Yes, because they were in the top of the top list
On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically
said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CPU...
Yes, because they were in the top of the top list
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web
apps, and not dovecot?
But then why was it fine
On 2011-03-08 12:47 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
(dovecot 2.0.11 / TB 3.0.4)
I think you're on to something here.
You do need to update TB too you know...
The number of bugs squashed since 3.0.4 are too vast too even begin to
contemplate...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-08 3:38 PM, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
You don't see how it might be possible that 2.0.x does something that
1.1.x didn't do that your webmail app might not like, without it being a
dovecot bug?
I'm not saying it is or it isn't, but I'd look
For anyone who is interested:
http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/ImapProxy.jsp
They also have one for troubleshooting smtp (smtpProxy)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-02 7:50 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Sorry, Charles , I didn't see your request not to top post.
No problem...
Is there s certain procedure for upgrading from dovecot 1.x to 2.x?
Do I uninstall the current version on my machine?
Or, is there an upgrade option during install?
I just
On 2011-03-03 8:53 AM, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
Dovecot 1.0.10.
Upgrading would be a very good idea and would likely solve your problem
in the process... there should be repos that have the latest versions
available.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-03 11:19 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Oh! After upgrading to v2 everything worked as expected, and it was
quite easy to set up!
Thanks, Charles.
No worries, glad you got it sorted...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-03 11:16 AM, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
Upgrading would be a very good idea and would likely solve your problem
in the process... there should be repos that have the latest versions
available.
Unfortunately this was what i tried a month before, without success.
After upgrading
On 2011-03-01 6:23 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
My dovecot.conf file is as follows:
base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/
...
UNEDITED doveconf -n output is always preferred - which normally shows
the dovecot version... what version is this?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Please don't top-post...
On 2011-03-02 10:21 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 4:27 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-01 6:23 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
My dovecot.conf file is as follows:
base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/
...
UNEDITED doveconf -n output is always preferred - which normally
On 2011-02-28 11:20 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 20:17 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Some potential (future) uses for imapc include:
* Locally caching IMAP proxy
* Maybe even fully transparent proxy to client, so at office it would
be using Dovecot proxy while at home it
35% /home/centos
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2011-02-25 1:58 PM, Il Neofita wrote:
I am not able to get the quota out from dovecot
I have tried with thunderbird and roundcube without luck
this is my conf
# 2.0.beta6
Upgrade first
On 2011-02-25 1:58 PM, Il Neofita wrote:
I am not able to get the quota out from dovecot
I have tried with thunderbird and roundcube without luck
this is my conf
# 2.0.beta6
Upgrade first, them come back with question.
Too many fixes since beta6...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-02-21 7:33 AM, sunhux G wrote:
=== latest maillog ==
Feb 21 16:36:34 hostname postfix/smtpd[1372]: input attribute value: 0
Feb 21 16:36:34 hostname postfix/smtpd[1372]: private/rewrite socket:
wanted attribute: transport
Feb 21 16:36:34 hostname
On 2011-02-21 8:02 AM, sunhux G wrote:
In /etc/postfix/master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v
I just have to remove the -v then restart postfix?
correct...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-02-21 10:52 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
I may end up upgrading the local copy to 2.0.9 before the move so they
will be similar.
I would definitely do that first if it were me... makes it much easier
to roll back if you need to.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-02-16 12:28 PM, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
During migration process we are run Dovecot as proxy of Courier-imap
until any user get migrated depend of ldap attribute.
Details of how you did this would be much appreciated...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-02-16 11:42 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.2.2011, at 22.16, Maria Arrea wrote:
*2º Disaster recovery: indexes mail store mismatch*
When creating backups, indexes and mail store are in different
paths. My backup takes several hours, so indexes are copied BEFORE
mail stores. Is the
On 2011-02-10 4:44 AM, mich...@lattari.eu wrote:
Hi!
I cannot connect to the dovecot server :-( I get Windows Mail Client Error:
800d9. Please help :-
# 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
First, upgrade... current version is 2.0.9... it is silly to start off
On 2011-02-10 2:53 PM, Sergio Moscoso wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I've tried to configure with the option that you
suggest but I can't login via POP3(110).
Maybe if I can explain in detail you can help me.
I have 2 domains, domain1 domain2
I also have 2 users with the same user name
On 2011-02-08 1:21 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
The Scality webpages mentions they´ve developed storage connector for dovecot:
http://www.scality.com/storage-solutions/
whatever that means..
Not so great - they're linking to dovecot.COM instead of dovecot.ORG...
--
Best regards,
On 2011-02-07 10:22 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Possible? Yes. Do I want to add such code? Not really. It'll just
slow down deliveries for most other people.
Just fyi, this is how postfix works - checks for user 'xxx-yyy', then
just 'xxx'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-02-02 7:19 AM, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
Is it possible to send logs to syslog and files set by log_path and
log_info_path on config?
Just two logs at the same time (not realtime).
This would need to be done by your syslogger...
syslog-ng can do this easily...
--
Best regards,
On 2011-01-21 4:30 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-20 4:06 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I've been reading
a bit, and I think the issue is that postfix adds X-Original-To when
delivering to a mailbox - which delivery via smtp/lmtp isn't.
I'm not sure if postfix should
On 2011-01-20 6:51 PM, Alex Cherniak wrote:
I'd like to allow a user to move messages between his folders on Dovecot
IMAP account, but prevent move/copy from different accounts (Exchange in
particular).
Outlook uses xx UID COPY 1 folder and then xx UID STORE 1 +FLAGS
(\Deleted \Seen) for
On 2011-01-20 6:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:50 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
But this woun´t work if the maildir has been modified outside of
dovecot (i.e. webmail usage). Are there any simple interface I can use
in this short snippet for noticing that the index is
On 2011-01-20 4:06 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I've been reading
a bit, and I think the issue is that postfix adds X-Original-To when
delivering to a mailbox - which delivery via smtp/lmtp isn't.
I'm not sure if postfix should be adding it - postfix applies
virtual_aliases_maps, then delivers to
On 2011-01-20 3:31 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:52PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-19 5:04 PM, pch0317 wrote:
I have dovecot 2.0.beta6 and I'm newbie with dovecot.
First assignment: upgrade to 2.0.9... why waste time fighting with bugs
On 2011-01-19 5:04 PM, pch0317 wrote:
I have dovecot 2.0.beta6 and I'm newbie with dovecot.
First assignment: upgrade to 2.0.9... why waste time fighting with bugs
that are already long fixed?
;)
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-01-18 5:04 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
2.6.26-gentoo-r4 i686 Gentoo Base System release 1.12.14
Why are you using a kernel that is no longer even in portage?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-01-17 4:49 AM, Joseph Tam wrote:
It forces users to process their Email (or at least their INBOX).
and keeps packratting in check. Super-big INBOX quotas seem to encourage
wasteful habits. I've helped some users clean out their mailboxes and
was surpised at the amount of junk being
On 2011-01-17 6:42 AM, Antonio Manogué wrote:
I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
project.
What you really need to 'know' is that 1.0.7 is extremely old, and you
need to update, *especially* if you are starting a new project.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-01-17 7:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-17 6:42 AM, Antonio Manogué wrote:
I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
project.
What you really need to 'know' is that 1.0.7 is extremely old,
And I just noticed this was not even 1.0.7, but 1.0RC7
On 2011-01-15 9:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Then, enforce a smallish per user quota (how much would depend on your
particular environment, but I'm thinking something like 250 or maybe
500MB, since our users do get a lot of large attachments in the course
of doing business) on their INBOX
On 2011-01-17 2:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:07 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-15 9:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Then, enforce a smallish per user quota (how much would depend on your
particular environment, but I'm thinking something like 250 or maybe
500MB
On 2011-01-17 3:14 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
There was some interest in Trojita (an IMAP client) on this list at one
point. It looks like it's been seeing steady development again:
http://jkt.flaska.net/blog/Trojita_v0_2_9__a_Qt_IMAP_e_mail_client.html
Interesting, thanks!
--
Best
On 2011-01-17 4:58 PM, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
We are now running dovecot 2.0.9 with indexes in a ram disk and maildir
storage in a test system. We have the following questions:
- If there is a power outage / kernel crash, we will lose the
content of ramdisk. We have tested
It would be nice if some of you could stop with the personal attacks.
While I agree that assuming that all users only receive 4K emails is not
realistic in most environments, neither is assuming a requirement of all
of the super-duper triple redundant hot fail-over for a mailstore with
no quota
On 2011-01-14 9:32 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
I asked the ESX admin to fix the clock, but disabled the VMware
synchronisation and now use only ntp in the guest. Never looked back.
Interesting... I thought this was the one thing that you were *never*
supposed to do??
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-01-14 1:44 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
When feeling the need for a deeper read:
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/Timekeeping-In-VirtualMachines.pdf
Cool... thanks for the explanation and link...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 1/7/2011 9:58 AM, William Blunn wrote:
On 07/12/2010 15:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
However, when the account is viewed in Windows Thunderbird 3.1.6 or
Outlook 2010 the 3rd tier dirs are not seen, nor can they be
subscribed to. On a whim, I decided to try Apple Mail 4.3 to view the
account
On 6.1.2011, at 0.47, Joan Moreau wrote:
# doveconf | grep mdbox
mdbox_preallocate_space = no
mdbox_rotate_interval = 0
mdbox_rotate_size = 2 M
Are you certain these were set the same way when you converted?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-01-04 5:55 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I have a huge block of email that was misdelivered into the wrong
folder. Moving it where it should be is not just all from one folder
to being all of another folder.
Not sure what you mean here, but...
Basically, the index files need to be rebuilt.
On 2010-12-29 9:40 PM, Seasoul wrote:
Hi,
I am running Dovecot Version 1.0.15on a Debian server, with postfix and
postfixadmin.
The very first thinmg you should do is upgrade... 1.0.15 is very old...
I'm sure there are other issues involved, but you will get much more
meaningful help if you
On 2010-12-30 6:19 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:32 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
Also, if we change the separator, do we have to change it on the subscription
file ? Could it be the source of my problem ?
No. TB just seems to break down if separator is changed. Recreating
On 2010-12-23 10:27 AM, David Warden wrote:
I know Thunderbird can be difficult when it comes to new folders showing
up on the server that it didn't create.
Main reason I always uncheck the 'show only subscribed folders' option
in the Advanced settings...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-12-23 2:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-23 10:27 AM, David Warden wrote:
I know Thunderbird can be difficult when it comes to new folders
showing up on the server that it didn't create.
Main reason I always uncheck the 'show
On 2010-12-22 12:07 PM, oddball56 wrote:
Anyway, here's the wanted output:
auth_mechanisms = plain login
You trimmed the first few lines? What version of dovecot is this?
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 2010-12-20 1:35 PM, PA wrote:
Dovecot -n
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-194.el5PAE i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) ext3
Why'd you snip the version?
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 2010-12-20 12:09 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
Now, I'm using lmtp. The reply works great.
Quota per user looks good.
Question: can I have quota per domain?
I don't use it, but latest version of postfixadmin supports domain and
user quotas...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-12-16 3:15 PM, Alex Cherniak wrote:
After several trouble free months and without any obvious reason our
server just stopped working. I cannot even re-start it:
[r...@dsmail /]# service dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot.log:
Permission
On 2010-12-15 7:38 PM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
Here is the relevant doveconf -n output:
...
Please always include *full* doveconf -n output, not just what you
*think* is relevant... its not that much more, and includes extra info
that people sometimes forget - like dovecot version (and
On 2010-12-16 6:53 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
It looks like Timo's patch fixes the problem. Context switches are
now back to normal, and the load graph is smooth and lower. I saw
someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
Out of curiosity, when you say lower - how does the load actually
compare now
On 2010-12-16 8:55 AM, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
El 16/12/10 14:50, Sebastian Urbanneck escribió:
Following:
We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used
to have only mail accounts under our own domain, but since we're also
a webhoster the people began to ask
On 2010-12-16 8:59 AM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
Here is the full doveconf -n output:
# 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35-23-virtual x86_64 Ubuntu 10.10
Timo - am I crazy, or did this output used to include the filesystem too?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-12-15 2:17 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.12.2010, at 19.16, Wilberth Perez wrote:
auth_username_format = %Lu -(in version 1.2.10 this work fine)
..
Debug: shadow(wpe...@mydomain,1.2.3.4): lookup
Info: shadow(wpe...@mydomain,1.2.3.4): unknown user
auth: Debug: client out: FAIL
On 2010-12-13 2:45 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:23:43 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Did you already try deleting the local copy of the Inbox?
The problem has solved. User account was recreated - that helped.
Also, we have this problem with various dovecot (starting from
On 2010-12-13 6:24 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard drive.
Bug Number please? Never had that
On 2010-12-11 3:00 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Hello Timo, and all.
Preface:
From time to time we have problems with thunderbird. The problem is
that mail client begin to sync users inbox (or other folder) and this
process didn't stop. Last time we have this situation - our
monitoring
On 2010-12-07 7:02 PM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
Thanks for the note. Although I'm not happy to see the OP used the
shotgun approach to get help...
indeed but it's not then end of the world. good job there are nice
folk on this list to help out.
The point is if you continue using the shotgun
On 2010-12-08 8:54 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
The point is if you continue using the shotgun approach, you will
quickly wear out your welcome and any good will others may be
predisposed to provide.
I'm well aware of what the point is - i think it's ok to give people
the benefit of the
On 2010-12-08 9:01 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 12/08/2010 07:35 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
The point is if you continue using the shotgun approach, you will
quickly wear out your welcome and any good will others may be
predisposed to provide.
I try to lurk read as much as I can before
On 2010-12-08 1:39 PM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I understand. I will make sure I don't remove that information in
future. Thank you for making me aware of that Marcus.
oops, sorry not Marcus - Charles. I do apologise.
lol - no worries, I've been called *much* worse ;)
And thank *you* for
On 2010-12-07 4:45 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I keep getting this error, and I have no clue where it comes from. I
have no localhost in my fetchmailrc file, all I have in main.cf is:
mydestination = paulandcilla.homelinux.org, localhost
And you think this is dovecot related because... ?
--
On 2010-12-03 5:43 AM, paul wrote:
I am the only one running thunderbird. .I normally let thunderbird
stay open forever.
That's most likely your problem. Simply put - and regardless of what
*should* be the case - Thunderbird is *not* stable enough to leave
running 'forever'. In fact, it gets
On 11/26/2010 12:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So plan #1: deprecate this usage. If global-acls is a directory, keep
using the old method. But the new preferred method would be for it to
be a file that contains all of the global ACLs. Typically there
should be very few entries, so this should
On 2010-11-23 5:27 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 23.11.2010 09:57, schrieb Peer Heinlein:
We're running Dovecot 2.0.2 and sometimes a user creates several imap-
prozesses, all of them hanging with the UID-command, using 100% of the
CPU resources:
snip
Unfortunetaly I can't try an update
On 2010-11-23 2:04 PM, Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
Hi helpful list!
I have this user that has two different accounts om the mail server. One
is a system account, the other is a virtual account (for what it is
worth...). This user would like to have all his email to the virtual
mail
On 2010-11-22 12:16 AM, Joy wrote:
I know that i can change the default namespace configuation of dovecot
to work with courier-imap namespace but not willing to do that so
suggest me something which can help me doing the same.
Just setup both - the ones already configured to use INBOX. will
On 2010-11-19 1:40 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
The storage requirements have more than halved (15GB vs 34GB)
and are much easier to rsync/backup. I love mdbox. :)
Hi Axel,
Are you using SiS? Or was this just due to having far fewer tiny files
wasting blocks (or however that works)?
--
Best
On 2010-11-15 1:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, the OP won't hear this from end users. They don't even know what
Dovecot is, will have never heard of it nor SIS.
The only folks he might take grief from is fellow sysadmins. But why
would they care?
Methinks it was a joke Stan... ;)
Also,
On 2010-11-15 5:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The OP told his users long ago do this. Then he made a change and
told them oh, you don't really need to do that anymore. Then,
possibly, down the road, he tells them, oh, now you need to do it
the old way again.
Ummm... no, he didn't. Go back and
On 2010-11-12 1:21 PM, Brad Davidson wrote:
ssl_listen should be a port or address:port to listen on with SSL
enabled. 'required' is not a valid hostname on your network.
You should probably read this:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig?highlight=ssl_listen#line-20
Hi Brad,
Did you just
On 2010-11-12 1:21 PM, Brad Davidson wrote:
You should probably read this:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig
Timo - is there any reason that there isn't an equivalent MainConfig
page for wiki2?
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MainConfig
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-11-10 1:48 PM, David Ford wrote:
Use this patch,
Better to update, no? 1.2.9 is a bit behind... or is this not fixed in
the current stable 1.2.16?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-11-10 2:59 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Got sort of a strange problem on one email account. Everything works
fine with Thunderbird/IMAP showing the correct unread message count. But
on my DroidX smartphone one of my email accounts always shows one unread
message, but I can't bring any unread
On 2010-11-04 7:28 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-11-04 15:57:31 -0700, Asai wrote:
Is it possible to automatically authenticate Dovecot users using
the same type of mechanism which makes Postfix able to simply check
SMTP users using the mynetworks variable?
Basically I would like to be
On 2010-11-05 8:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* David Ford da...@blue-labs.org:
why don't you run clamdscan on delivery?
I do.
On 2010-11-05 9:33 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Ralph, high cpu load is common with clamscan
Hmmm... maybe dovecot 2.0 is doing something different from 1.2
On 2010-11-05 9:18 AM, David Ford wrote:
snip
-d
-- Linux - freedom to build is good Please top-post and trim when
replying to my messages.
snip
David, once was funny, and even better when replying to a message from
someone who has a 'real' 'disclaimer' sig - but I sure hope you're not
On 2010-11-05 10:05 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
Hmmm... maybe dovecot 2.0 is doing something different from 1.2 that
causes your *live* clamdscan at delivery time to produce the heavier load...
Clamdscan is not running at delivery time
On 2010-11-05 10:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
You plainly state that you *do* run clamdscan on delivery...
Not on this machine.
Gotcha...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-11-03 9:12 AM, Jürgen Obermann wrote:
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
But you would probably benefit from not having that many login
processes: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
I now switched the login processes from high security to high
performance mode, because the
Timo,
If I want to provide decent body search capability, what is the
best/most reliable/easiest to implement method to use?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-11-03 4:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Charles, how many messages are in the IMAP folders you are body searching?
Some have as many as 25,000... and yes, I'm currently using maildir, but
have been considering switching to mdbox, but its still a bit too new
for me to be really comfortable
On 2010-11-02 2:58 AM, Jay Mobile wrote:
i hve a requirement of setting up two folders which should be shared
only to selected users only.
snip
lets assume user A wants to share a folder named shared with user B
only. how can i get this done?
That's about as basic as it gets... did you read
On 2010-11-02 4:34 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
The problem is users cannot open attachements from their clients
( thunderbird 3.1 ) it stays in download mode until timeout.
There are known problems with Thunderbird 3.x and attachments. Many have
been solved with 3.1.x, but some still persist.
On 2010-11-02 11:44 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
There is a patch for the 2.1.x branch that addresses this, and MM3 will
finally fix this properly, but MM3 isn't quite ready for prime time yet
(getting close though)...
Where is the mentioned patch located?
On 2010-11-01 2:09 PM, Peter Reinhold wrote:
Otherwise, mailman isn't hard to setup. and you get the benefits of a
real list manager.
I looked at this, does this play well with Dovecot in the above
mentioned configuration?
Yes, but with the following caveat - there is a limitation in the
On 2010-10-28 4:01 AM, Anton Dollmaier wrote:
Or does anyone knows a good webbased tool for dovecot.
Actually, you may use Dovecot with any existing
courier-Mailserver-GUI.
E.g., there is Postfixadmin:
http://postfixadmin.sourceforge.net/
+1 to postfixadmin...
You only have to setup
On 2010-10-25 9:13 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
We had this this morning:
2.0 is still getting a good number of bug fixes so if you're going to
use it you should be prepared to upgrade to the latest and see if the
problem is already fixed before reporting a possible bug.
2.0.6 was just released...
--
On 2010-10-21 6:58 AM, William Blunn wrote:
Though in the case of the small number of large files (i.e. the
opposite of ReiserFS's strength), which you would get with mbox and
mdbox,
Good point...
one would have to ask what upside ReiserFS would bring to the party
which would outweigh the
On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
If you mean you are using *sender* address verification on these
domains, you will eventually get blacklisted by them if your system has
On 2010-10-21 9:37 AM, Fabricio Archanjo wrote:
Does someone run dspam or just me??
I like very much this antispam solution.
I *much* prefer ASSP myself...
Vastly easier to install/configure than dspam, and more effective too
imnsho, *especially out of the box, but even also after dspam is
On 2010-10-21 10:40 AM, William Blunn wrote:
On 21/10/2010 14:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
Reiserfs is not 'kaput', it is still being maintained in the linux
kernel (both v3 and work is ongoing for v4), and will be for the
foreseeable future.
For the benefit of anyone reading
On 2010-10-21 4:52 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
For the fun of it, i used --with-storages=maildir mbox dbox mdbox cydir
(not intending to use all, but just to see) and this led `make` to fail with
something about dbox, so I simply removed it and got a successful compile.
Its not dbox any
On 2010-10-20 12:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Oh, interesting. I didn't know that was possible. And even better: Linux
has fallocate() that can do it for other filesystems than just XFS. Or
looks like it's only XFS and ext4 (ext3 doesn't support it).
How about reiserfs (3, not 4)?
--
Best
On 2010-10-18 3:38 AM, vladi wrote:
Example: I send email to info@ with subject: 'new offer': jane and john
receive both a copy. Jane with outlook download her mail in the morning
and delete the message. outlook mark it for deletion and leave it in her
maildir.
That *sounds* like IMAP, not
701 - 800 of 1922 matches
Mail list logo
