3-login director
}
service quota-warning {
executable = script /etc/dovecot/quota-warning.sh
user = dovecot
}
ssl_cert =
wrote:
On 31 Dec 2018, at 0.43, Laz C. Peterson wrote: Hello
there, Everything was working fine on Dovecot 2.2.10 (on CentOS 7), but after
updating to version 2.2.36, our
Hello there,
Everything was working fine on Dovecot 2.2.10 (on CentOS 7), but after updating
to version 2.2.36, our director servers are not able to proxy LMTP.
We are sending mail from exim to the local Dovecot LMTP socket, which then used
to send it to our internal mail servers on port 24.
for 14.04 are so far behind …
~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Laz C. Peterson <l...@paravis.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Dovecot ~
>
> I know this bug has been discussed previously for other versions of dsync,
> pigeonhole and dovecot … But we still c
Hello Dovecot ~
I know this bug has been discussed previously for other versions of dsync,
pigeonhole and dovecot … But we still can’t get dsync to create the symbolic
link for the sieve script after it is created on a replicated server.
We are running Ubuntu 16.04.1 with the official Ubuntu
We had this issue as well - switch your primary authentication to LDAP and make
sure it is attempting those auth sources first before any PAM sources. You
also don’t need to have your Dovecot server joined to the domain by doing it
this way, which is nice.
We were previously using PAM auth
the service level
availability I'm after while still allowing for maintenance on the systems
w/o clients noticing.
-Chad
On Jul 20, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Laz C. Peterson l...@paravis.net wrote:
I’m trying to do this too. But the goal would be simply for automatic
failover to the other
I’m trying to do this too. But the goal would be simply for automatic failover
to the other datacenter. Everything is working if the server’s unique hostname
is entered, but I want to do something like round robin DNS that mail clients
will automatically attempt to connect to the other IP if
01:41 schrieb Laz C. Peterson:
I did attempt to switch the PAM/Kerberos authentication to Dovecot
LDAP authentication, but now performance is unbelievably slow.
Any thoughts to this?
In case you have multiple passdb backends, it could be, that LDAP only gets
its chance, after PAM did time
Paravis, LLC
Ph: 951.319.3240 x201
On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:25 AM, Laz C. Peterson l...@paravis.net wrote:
Peter,
Yes that is a possibility. I will try disabling PAM (or switching the auth
order) and see if that makes a difference. Thanks for the suggestion!
~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
Ph
how to fix the performance issue.
Any thoughts to this?
~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
Ph: 951.319.3240 x201
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Axel Luttgens axel.luttg...@skynet.be wrote:
Le 1 juil. 2015 à 04:38, Laz C. Peterson
a écrit :
I have an interesting case here …
Virtual
serve the purpose. I just can’t figure out how to fix the performance issue.
Any thoughts to this?
~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
Ph: 951.319.3240 x201
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Axel Luttgens axel.luttg...@skynet.be wrote:
Le 1 juil. 2015 à 04:38, Laz C. Peterson
a écrit :
I have
11 matches
Mail list logo