Re: Sieve vacation function sends auto-reply with generic From: Address

25.09.23, 14:57 +0200, Thomas Boroske: I have a question regarding the dovecot sieve vacation function that I am unable to answer myself by reading the documentation. A while ago we moved our dovecot server to a newer system (and newer dovecot version 2.3.16 ). This worked mostly fine,

Re: sievec: Misleading error message

25.08.23, 13:06 +0200, Robert Nowotny via dovecot: I would say "elsif" itself is a typo - in most languages it is "elseif". in that case both versions should be valid keywords - the current (but unusual) "elsif" and the more common "elseif" You are obviously entitled to your opinion, but

Re: Import collection of files containing one raw message each into dovecot

21.03.23, 14:58 +0100, Aki Tuomi: On 21/03/2023 15:50 EET Markus Schönhaber wrote: given a bunch of files, each containing the raw source of a single email message. There's no structural or naming scheme like Maildir or something. Is there a (easy) way to import those mails into dovecot

Import collection of files containing one raw message each into dovecot

Hi, given a bunch of files, each containing the raw source of a single email message. There's no structural or naming scheme like Maildir or something. Is there a (easy) way to import those mails into dovecot? AIUI doveadm import needs a source location in a supported mailbox format - which

Re: Dovecot v2.3.20 released

22.12.22, 09:06 +0100, Aki Tuomi: [...] - replicator: Replication queue had various issues, potentially causing replication requests to become stuck. - stats: Invalid Prometheus label names were created with specific [End Of Message] Is there something missing at the end? -- Regards mks

Re: Unprivileged users can't use doveadm anymore in 2.3.16

16.09.21, 18:50 +0200, dove...@ptld.com: What happened in 2.3.16 to doveadm? You can no longer use the command as an unprivileged user like you could in 2.3.8 Roundcube uses "doveadm pw" to change users passwords and runs as user apache. This works in 2.3.8 but in 2.3.16 you get an error.

Re: Sieve by the addressee

20.02.21, 15:44 +0100, m...@shadrinden.ru: > I have a sieve that is supposed to put all messages addressed to this mailing > list into a separate folder: > > if anyof (address :is "to" "m...@shadrinden.ru", > address :is "to" "dovecot@dovecot.org") { > fileinto "mail_list"; >

Re: 10G mails use 90G on disk

29.01.21, 12:32 +0100, Aki Tuomi: > On 29/01/2021 13:24 Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> Nevertheless, since this is a very low volume server and the user in >> question only sends and receives a few dozen mails, weighing a hand full >> of MB, per day, I'm at a loss to underst

Re: 10G mails use 90G on disk

29.01.21 11:46 +0100, Aki Tuomi: >> On 29/01/2021 12:41 Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox) >> resides got filled up to the brim although the combined quotas for the

10G mails use 90G on disk

Hello, on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox) resides got filled up to the brim although the combined quotas for the users are much smaller than the disk's capacity. For one user I see the following: doveadm quota get -u @ Username Quota name Type

Re: [Dovecot-news] Headsup on feature removal

18.03.20, 04:32 CET, Peter: > Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major > release, 2.4.0 instead. It makes sense to retain, in as much as is > possible, feature backwards compatibility across a major release. Seconded! That you are going to drop features from the

Re: Pigeonhole release v0.4.24.2

Aki Tuomi, 28.08.19, 14:06 CEST: > Tarball is available at > > https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.24.2.tar.gz > https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.24.2.tar.gz.sig On https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/download.html the link to

Re: New install - getting error: "Failed to initialize SSL server context: Couldn't parse DH parameters"

James Brown, Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:28:47 +1100: > I’ve used: > > Openssl gendh 2048 > > And put the output: [...] > > Into a file dh.pem and then added > > ssl_dh=/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dh.pem Try ssl_dh=

Re: Debian: Dovecot 2.3.0.1 won't start if dovecot-pop3d is missing

Stephan Bosch, Sat, 3 Mar 2018 08:59:16 +0100: > Op 3/2/2018 om 8:58 PM schreef Markus Schönhaber: >> Yep, explicitly setting >> protocols = >> before >> !include_try /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/*.protocol >> helps. >> >> IMO Something like that s

Re: Debian: Dovecot 2.3.0.1 won't start if dovecot-pop3d is missing

Aki Tuomi, Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:06:35 +0200: > the problem is default >  protocols = imap pop3  Ah, OK. I wasn't aware that the default had changed. It seems to be protocols = imap pop3 lmtp now. > packaging should use > protocols = > protocols = $protocols imap Yep, explicitly setting

Debian: Dovecot 2.3.0.1 won't start if dovecot-pop3d is missing

Hello, given a Debian 9 system with Dovecot 2.2.34 installed from self-built packages made from the official tarball combined with Stephan Bosch's debian files (upgraded multiple times from packages made in a similar way). Today, I updated this system to 2.3.0.1 from the official repository at

Re: Pigeonhole 0.4.20 source archive based on v. 0.4.20-rc1?

Stephan Bosch, Fri, 1 Sep 2017 22:12:56 +0200: > I created the tarball before committing the change. I do that in most > cases I think. The ChangeLog is created automatically. I see nothing > quite wrong here, although you could argue I should commit before making > the definitive release

Pigeonhole 0.4.20 source archive based on v. 0.4.20-rc1?

Hi, looking at the source archive of pigeonhole 0.4.20 I noticed that the contained ChangeLog mentions v0.4.20.rc1 as first entry and pigeonhole-version.h defines git revision 7cd71ba as version where I'd expect

Re: v2.2.27 Debian packages on xi.dovecot.fi

Stephan Bosch, Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:37:35 +0100: > > Op 16-12-2016 om 10:30 schreef Markus Schönhaber: >> at the moment I see only packages named *2.2.26* on xi.dovecot.fi. Can >> we expect packages for v2.2.27 to appear there? > > Actually, there are packages there that

v2.2.27 Debian packages on xi.dovecot.fi

Hi, at the moment I see only packages named *2.2.26* on xi.dovecot.fi. Can we expect packages for v2.2.27 to appear there? -- Regards mks

Re: IX Out of Order?

Stephan Bosch, Sun, 1 May 2016 11:04:45 +0200: > No new oldstable packages will be available for the time being, until I > have time to look at this more. OK, thanks for the info (and for providing Debian packages in the first place!). -- Regards mks

Re: IX Out of Order?

Stephan Bosch, Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:16:55 +0200: > Oops. Turned off package composer for maintenance, but didn't turn it > back on. > > It is building now. Is there something to turn on to build packages in /debian/pool/wheezy-auto/dovecot-2.2 ? Or don't you provide packages for wheezy

Re: core not dumped

Am 19.03.2015 um 14:07 schrieb James: There is some underlying problem with imap-login but in order to debug it I'd like to see a core file. On error dovecot reports core not dumped. If I put abort() in the code at the point it is reporting then a core file is written, so there is no OS

Re: identify MUA connecting?

29.07.2014 09:08, Frank Elsner: Not in general: cyrus/imaps[9143]: client id: name Thunderbird version 24.6.0 I guess, dovecot simply must learn it. Dovecot already knows about the ID fields a client sends. It just doesn't log them by default. This default, of course, can be changed - by

Re: [Dovecot] Changing SSL certificates - switching from self-signed to RapidSSL

18.04.2014 19:57, Charles Marcus: Ok, been wanting to do this for a while, and I after the Heartbleed fiasco, the boss finally agreed to let me buy some real certs... Until now, we've been using self-signed certs with the following dovecot config: ssl = required ssl_cert =

Re: [Dovecot] Changing SSL certificates - switching from self-signed to RapidSSL

18.04.2014 22:12, Charles Marcus: On 4/18/2014 3:57 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: Everything seems to be working, BUT... I'm now seeing some of these errors, that were not showing up in the logs before: 2014-04-18T15:42:24-04:00 dinkumthinkum dovecot: imap-login:

[Dovecot] [OT] GNUTLS (was: Re: Dovecot SASL Client support?)

09.01.2013 09:52, Patrick Ben Koetter: If it is as good as GNUTLS, I'd rather stick with Cyrus SASL. Out of curiosity: what's so bad with GNUTLS? -- Regards mks

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

24.07.2012 10:49, Morten Stevens: No, greylisting is really a bad solution. It is not RFC compliant and delays the mail traffic. No. Rejecting mail with an temporary error is perfectly RFC compliant. It happens all the time without greylisting. Because the authors of the SMTP RFC knew that

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

24.07.2012 11:57, Arnaud Abélard: - With greylisting we aren't rejecting potentially spammy mails, we are rejecting misbehaving servers. That's important, legally speaking. We could be in trouble if we rejected an important mail by mistake when our server actually accepted it. That's

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

24.07.2012 14:30, Noel Butler: On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:06 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote: You must not accept mail you are unwilling or unable to deliver - ever! That insisted behaviour was changed four years ago, read up on RFC 5321 Where does it say so? IIRC I doubt you do

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.1 stable packages for Debian?

11.06.2012 13:23, Krzysztof Trybowski: it is strange, but Dovecot 2.x still didn't make it into Debian (not even backports). It seems that 2.1.7 has landed in squeeze-backports. -- Regards mks

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP Label Updates not showing up across shared account

08.06.2011 14:59, Timo Sirainen: Well, this was an interesting message. multipart/alternative where first part was text and second part a GIF image. To me, it seems the second part is not a GIF but rather a multipart/related which, in turn, contains the GIF as first (and only) part. Maybe

[Dovecot] [OT] Copying command output to clipboard (was: Re: setting up Dovecot)

12.11.2010 00:35, Scott Berry: I attached the dovecot.conf file as a screenshot using dovecot -n because I am blind and haven't quite figured out how to copy from the terminal to Gnome yet. Don't know if that helps, but dovecot -n | xclip -selection clipboard would send the output of dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] Why : dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1 ?

Koenraad Lelong: Am I to conclude that what I'm trying to do is impossible then, with dovecot ? I would like to enable sieve on a system where I have aliasses which point to multiple recipients. For some reason dovecot needs the DRhu flags. The D flag needs

Re: [Dovecot] Why : dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1 ?

Koenraad Lelong: I'm trying to activate sieve. In all tutorials I have seen I need to set dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1 in Postfix's main.cf. Can anyone explain why ? I like to know because when I set this and the dovecot transport in Postfix, I'm having problems when aliasses

Re: [Dovecot] testing needed

Timo Sirainen: I'm still interested in HP-UX, AIX and Cygwin results. Maybe in Cygwin it could be broken, but then again I don't really care about Cygwin. On Cygwin 1.7 (the version currently under development) it works: $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 sauron 1.7.0(0.214/5/3) 2009-10-03 14:33 i686

Re: [Dovecot] Problem with IMAP (rename and delete non existent folder).

Lenthir: :) If I could upgrade I would do this... but this is not simple in my case. Shortly - we must merge versions... I second Charles' opinion that in this case running beta software is a pretty bad choice. That aside: what keeps you from installing a recent Dovecot build on a different

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot discards mail over quota

Steffen Kaiser: RFC2821 sec 2.1 Just as a side note (since Charles made his point very clear - to which I completely agree BTW): RFC 2821 is obsoleted by RFC 5321. Regards mks