Re: Doveadm backup...

Hi Stephen, Does it work if you delete the Maildir/ on the destination first and then initiate the backup? I ran into this problem recently - see my post on 21 Feb.  Looks very similar if not the same root cause. On 1/03/2022 6:46 am, Stephane Magnier wrote: I've seen in a previous

Nasty Bug: Re: Index Corruption Problem with new VM Host - But Only With Replication Enabled

Following up to my original mail: On 18/02/2022 3:59 pm, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, I've recently migrated my two VMs across from Linode (who use KVM) onto a local VPS service (which also uses KVM).  Since doing so I have started to see some strange problems with Dovecot relating to indexes

Index Corruption Problem with new VM Host - But Only With Replication Enabled

Hi, I've recently migrated my two VMs across from Linode (who use KVM) onto a local VPS service (which also uses KVM). Since doing so I have started to see some strange problems with Dovecot relating to indexes and replication. I have copied the configuration files across from old host to

Dovecot Replication Errors (only) when using tcps: as the mail_replica Protocol

Hi, I've been seeing errors logged for some time with replication processes, whereby replication sessions seem to be timing out periodically. This is with dovecot version 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171) and both are Gentoo x86_64. After some investigation I've determined that these timeouts are only

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

/667118 Note: it's not a problem with glibc-2.27, but new to 2.28. Reuben On 19/09/2018 6:53 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: I have no idea why it's returning invalid argument, maybe you need to raise this as issue with glibc? Aki On 19.09.2018 10:43, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Sure: thunderstorm ~ # cat

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

/nssswitch.conf? Aki On 19.09.2018 10:40, Reuben Farrelly wrote: I've been running with this almost identical patch already for some time: diff -up dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c --- dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt   2018-02-28 15:28

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

en On 19/09/2018 5:34 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: This is bit of a longshot, but can you try applying https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/63a74b9.patch and see if this helps? Aki On 19.09.2018 10:33, Reuben Farrelly wrote: glibc-2.28. There was a posting by Michael Marley on 31/08 saying he saw

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

glibc-2.28. There was a posting by Michael Marley on 31/08 saying he saw something similar to this problem after upgrading to 2.28 as well with 'doveadm purge'. Reuben On 19/09/2018 4:50 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: Which glibc version are you using? Aki On 19.09.2018 09:39, Reuben Farrelly

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

Hi Aki, How did you go with this in the end? Do you need anything more from me or were you able to reproduce this? Thanks, Reuben On 1/09/2018 12:41 am, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Sure: https://www.reub.net/files/dovecot/lightning-dovecot.conf https://www.reub.net/files/dovecot/thunderstorm

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

: Reuben Farrelly Date: 31/08/2018 17:12 (GMT+02:00) To: Aki Tuomi , Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument No.  Neither of those are installed on either system. Reuben On 1/09/2018 12:09 am, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Could apparmor or seli

Re: Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

No. Neither of those are installed on either system. Reuben On 1/09/2018 12:09 am, Aki Tuomi wrote: Could apparmor or selinux be causing this! --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy Original message From: Reuben Farrelly Date: 31/08/2018 16:50 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List

Dovecot User Listing Error - getpwent() failed: Invalid Argument

Hi, I'm running dovecot-2.3 git and seeing on 2 of my Dovecot installations, the following message logged quite frequently: Aug 31 16:55:53 lightning.reub.net dovecot[7698]: auth-worker(7707): Error: getpwent() failed: Invalid argument Aug 31 16:55:53 lightning.reub.net dovecot[7698]:

Re: Reproducible SIGSEGV when Dovecot 2.3 compiled against glibc-2.28

On 8/08/2018 5:29 pm, Thore Bödecker wrote: Hey, you mentioned that dovecot builds fine, but does "make check" also complete successfully with a glibc-2.28 build on a glibc-2.28 system? We have been seeing segfaults during "make check" and it seems the following patch was able to make the

Re: Reproducible SIGSEGV when Dovecot 2.3 compiled against glibc-2.28

seems to be bit problematic, and what I read from their changelog, the crypt function should work as normal. That said, it would be somewhat helpful if you could use gdb to find out what was passed to crypt p sample[i].key p sample[i].salt the return value is, for some reason, an invalid point

Reproducible SIGSEGV when Dovecot 2.3 compiled against glibc-2.28

Hi, Dovecot 2.3 (release and current -git) versions compile, but fail to run when compiled against glibc-2.28. This is what is logged on startup: Aug 8 08:24:39 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot[569]: master: Dovecot v2.3.2.1 (0719df592) starting up for imap, lmtp, sieve, submission, sieve Aug

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

and it looks to be OK so far - touch wood - with 4 hours testing so far. Reuben On 7/06/2018 3:21 pm, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Still not quite right for me. Jun  7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

Still not quite right for me. Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

Hi, Checking in - this is still an issue with 2.3-master as of today (2.3.devel (3a6537d59)). I haven't been able to narrow the problem down to a specific commit. The best I have been able to get to is that this commit is relatively good (not perfect but good enough):

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

o, whether this issue goes away? Aki On 06 May 2018 at 15:21 Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Hi Andy, Funny you say that - I've been testing this very problem for some time today to narrow down the commits where I think the problem started occurring. So far I have been able

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

ecot.org/mailman/listinfo/dovecot>> />/Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 />//>/Reuben Farrelly wrote: />>/From: Michael Grimm https://dovecot.org/mailman/listinfo/dovecot>> />//>>>/[This is Dovecot 2.3.1 at FreeBSD STABLE-11.1 running in two jails at di

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

7a927-68f8-443f-ba59-e66ced8fe...@ellael.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Reuben Farrelly wrote: From: Michael Grimm <trash...@ellael.org> [This is Dovecot 2.3.1 at FreeBSD STABLE-11.1 running in two jails at distinct servers.] I did upgrade from 2.2.35 to 2.3.

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

Hi, -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:06:07 +0200 From: Michael Grimm To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors Message-ID: <29998016-d62f-4348-93d1-613b13da9...@ellael.org>

Re: dovecot-submission SMTP send error with Thunderbird (BODY=8BITMIME)

Hi again, On 24/12/2017 7:11 am, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 12/23/2017 om 7:18 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: Hi, With latest 2.3 -git (and 2.3.0 release), I'm running into this error with Thunderbird: "An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: 5.5.4 Unsupported mail

dovecot-submission SMTP send error with Thunderbird (BODY=8BITMIME)

Hi, With latest 2.3 -git (and 2.3.0 release), I'm running into this error with Thunderbird: "An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: 5.5.4 Unsupported mail BODY type. Please verify that your email address is correct in your account settings and try again." This is

Re: dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning (Was Re: dovecot Digest, Vol 174, Issue 64)

Hi again, On 1/11/2017 12:01 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 31.10.2017 15:00, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, On 30/10/2017 7:22 PM, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote: Message: 6 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:22:42 +0200 From: Teemu Huovila <teemu.huov...@dovecot.fi> To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subje

dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning (Was Re: dovecot Digest, Vol 174, Issue 64)

f36571ed9...@dovecot.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 30.10.2017 09:10, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 30.10.2017 00:23, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi Aki, On 30/10/2017 12:43 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On October 29, 2017 at 1:55 PM Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Hi ag

Re: dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning and Fatal Compile Error

Hi Aki, On 30/10/2017 12:43 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On October 29, 2017 at 1:55 PM Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Hi again, Chasing down one last problem which seems to have been missed from my last email: On 20/10/2017 9:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 20-10-2017 o

Re: dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning and Fatal Compile Error

Hi again, Chasing down one last problem which seems to have been missed from my last email: On 20/10/2017 9:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 20-10-2017 om 4:23 schreef Reuben Farrelly: On 18/10/2017 11:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 18 Oct 2017, at 6.34, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-d

Re: dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning and Fatal Compile Error

On 18/10/2017 11:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 18 Oct 2017, at 6.34, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: I haven't been tracking dovecot-2.3 until now, but I've just given it a quick run, and there are a few things that may need some attention. /usr/include/features.h

dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning and Fatal Compile Error

I haven't been tracking dovecot-2.3 until now, but I've just given it a quick run, and there are a few things that may need some attention. Linux x86-64, Gentoo, GCC-7.2.0 Dovecot 2.3 @ commit 32c2612514a404ebc226f32bb88f28d76ceb1db1 Compiled with: ./configure --prefix=/usr

Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

On 14/10/2017 8:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: OOn 13 Oct 2017, at 15.48, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Sure. Here you go: Oct 13 23:45:06 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: ==16947== Invalid read of size 8 Oct 13 23:45:06 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: d

Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

, at 23.10, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: No. Compiling entirely from -git source (on one system) and a Gentoo ebuild on another two. Reuben On 12/10/2017 10:38 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: Are you using the xi packages? If yes, can you please send me one fresh core? Aki On Octo

Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

.fi> wrote: We'll take a look ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> Date: 12/10/2017 07:50 (GMT+02:00) To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@dovecot.fi> Subject: Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

Hi, Just to confirm this is still a major problem for me with the 2.2.33.1 release (did not exist in previous releases). Reuben On 8/10/2017 6:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: Thanks! We'll look into it. --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy Original message From: Reuben Farrelly <reu

Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)

This appears to be breaking dsync at the moment and is caused by something committed in the last week or so. This is with the current -git of dovecot-2.2 (eaf276b33). The crash happens all the time - the logs are full of this message. Oct 7 20:31:24 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm:

Re: v2.2.30 released

On 31/05/2017 8:54 PM, James wrote: On 30/05/2017 19:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz There is a build problem in the configure/make/libtool process when using "./configure ... --with-storages=maildir ...". This was deliberate - see the

Re: 2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017

On 9/05/2017 12:46 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 8 May 2017, at 17.14, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: On 28/04/2017 7:27 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: This has been broken for the last few days: libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "li

Re: 2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017

On 8/05/2017 11:44 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 2017-05-08 16:23, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 8/05/2017 9:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 2017-05-08 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Following up on this as there has been no response and the problem is still present. As this is the master-2.2

Re: 2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017

On 8/05/2017 9:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 2017-05-08 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Following up on this as there has been no response and the problem is still present. As this is the master-2.2 branch I would have thought it would compile most of the time... Thanks On 28/04/2017

Re: 2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017

Hi, Following up on this as there has been no response and the problem is still present. As this is the master-2.2 branch I would have thought it would compile most of the time... Thanks On 28/04/2017 7:27 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: This has been broken for the last few days: libtool

2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017

This has been broken for the last few days: libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "lib10_quota_plugin.la" && ln -s "../lib10_quota_plugin.la" "lib10_quota_plugin.la" ) libtool: link: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -pipe -march=native -mtune=native -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: Dovecot 2.3 ?

Whoops. I meant from -git. Reuben On 24/04/2017 7:54 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 24.04.2017 12:30, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net>: Hi, Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? I'm using the daily builds on a low traffic machine. It's pr

Dovecot 2.3 ?

Hi, Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? I'm just interested in finding out how people are going with it, how stable is it and are there any interesting features that make it worth spending time looking at. I'm in a position where I can test with semi-live data (backed up and

Re: Replication Troubles

On 20/02/2017 9:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 17 Feb 2017, at 21.37, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote: Hi Dovecot Users, I’ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and get user complaints which I can’t explain. I found similar threads on this

Re: [PATCH] Manually cleanup OpenSSL from dovecot_openssl_common_global_unref()

Hi, This patch: On 15/11/2016 10:46 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 13.11.2016 20:04, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote: OpenSSL 1.1 features a cleanup function that is automatically run on shutdown using atexit(3). This function frees all OpenSSL-allocated resources. In dovecot, OpenSSL is loaded

Re: v2.2.26.0 released

I don't believe that is the case. I have 2.2.26.0 and -git building and running on multiple systems now (two of which are Gentoo boxes) with LibreSSL-2.5 - and these systems do not have OpenSSL installed. Are you running an old version of LibreSSL perhaps? I *think* LibreSSL-2.4 was OK as

Crash with latest -git as of 2.2.devel (c06590c)

Hi, Looks like something has been committed to master-2.2 in the last week which is causing crashes as soon as the remote user logs in: Sep 17 01:11:19 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: dsync-server(reuben): Error: read(lightning.reub.net) failed: EOF (last sent=mailbox_state, last recv=mail

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

On 24/08/2016 10:58 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 8/1/2016 om 3:37 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: In other words, the rules did eventually get propagated across, and based on the file sizes they are complete. But there is obviously something amiss with handling of dates (which in turn may relate

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve

Re: Occasional lock timeouts on Linode VM with Dovecot Replication

Hi again, Thanks for your response William, answers inline: On 21/07/2016 1:58 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Reuben, On Sunday, July 17, 2016 04:18:45 PM Reuben Farrelly wrote: I've been seeing periodic entries in my dovecot logs like this: dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(kaylene): Error

Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are

Occasional lock timeouts on Linode VM with Dovecot Replication

I've been seeing periodic entries in my dovecot logs like this: dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(kaylene): Error: Couldn't lock /home/kaylene/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out after 30 seconds: 3 Time(s) dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(reuben): Error: Couldn't lock /home/reuben/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed

Re: Unread Mail flag being reset frequently with dovecot -git master-2.2

On 30/06/2016 1:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 24 Jun 2016, at 06:18, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Hi again, I'm experiencing problems with the Dovecot git master-2.2 branch, in which mails that have been previously read are randomly appearing as unread. This h

Re: SSL Problem with -git master-2.2 tip (24 June 16)

On 30/06/2016 8:17 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 30 Jun 2016, at 01:09, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: On 30/06/2016 1:40 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 24 Jun 2016, at 01:51, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Current master-2.2 branch of Dovecot com

Re: SSL Problem with -git master-2.2 tip (24 June 16)

On 30/06/2016 1:40 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 24 Jun 2016, at 01:51, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dove...@reub.net> wrote: Current master-2.2 branch of Dovecot compiles for me on Gentoo x86_64 but experiences symbol errors when starting up: Jun 24 08:38:00 thunderstorm dovecot: lmtp(8180):

Unread Mail flag being reset frequently with dovecot -git master-2.2

Hi again, I'm experiencing problems with the Dovecot git master-2.2 branch, in which mails that have been previously read are randomly appearing as unread. This happens slowly and affects more and more emails the more changes that occur to a mailbox. I am using Maildir format and on Gentoo

SSL Problem with -git master-2.2 tip (24 June 16)

Current master-2.2 branch of Dovecot compiles for me on Gentoo x86_64 but experiences symbol errors when starting up: Jun 24 08:38:00 thunderstorm dovecot: lmtp(8180): Fatal: Couldn't load required plugin /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so: dlopen() failed:

Re: systemd changes in Git/Debian Auto-Builds

On 21/02/2016 11:35 PM, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote: By manually editing the systemd file above I was able to get the service up. Reuben Hi, where was your pid file located? --- Aki Tuomi In /var/run/dovecot : root@pi:~/dovecot/dovecot-2.2# ls -la /var/run/dovecot/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x 5

Re: systemd changes in Git/Debian Auto-Builds

On 21/02/2016 10:43 PM, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote: The PID-File seems to be expected under yet another sub-dir of /var/run/dovecot. Regards Thomas Hi, This is fixed in https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/22d75d47097ca83c6e824a5129d81e8f18fb589b --- Aki Tuomi This doesn't seem to be

Re: multi sync (2 servers) + selective sync + trigger

On 31/05/2015 7:23 PM, b-dovecot@grmbl.net wrote: Â - If you really use DHT-like algorithms, rebalancing your cluster will require mininum data movement and you add or remove nodes. It will require a small change on the SQL queries above so that the new node also recognizes the new

Re: Additional userdb variables in passwd [was Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?]

On 8/05/2015 11:04 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 8/05/2015 6:10 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 05/07/2015 02:32 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote: On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila

Re: v2.2.17 release candidate released

On 10/05/2015 7:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 10 May 2015, at 11:47, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote: Ok we have some (well, lots actually) of coredumps now: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7f4834fcc222 in fts_user_get_data_lang (user

Re: v2.2.17 release candidate released

On 10/05/2015 5:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: How do I go about debugging this further? How do I go about getting a backtrace on what is essentially a child process that doesn't produce a core? (Note that my installation normally does produce cores when it crashes, so there's something

Re: v2.2.17 release candidate released

I'm now seeing these crashes in the indexing code: May 10 12:22:32 tornado.reub.net dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.17.rc1 (3903badc4ee0+) starting up for imap, lmtp, sieve ... May 10 13:07:50 tornado.reub.net dovecot: indexer: Error: Indexer worker disconnected, discarding 1 requests for

Re: Additional userdb variables in passwd [was Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?]

On 8/05/2015 6:10 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 05/07/2015 02:32 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote: On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: Also is there a way to restrict

Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?

On 7/05/2015 7:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 04 May 2015, at 17:11, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote: On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: Even if this doesn't end up working I figure I'll get to learn a little more about the indexes themselves in the process. dsyncing

Additional userdb variables in passwd [was Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?]

On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote: On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack around system first and last UIDs? You can set the userdb

Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?

On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack around system first and last UIDs? You can set the userdb to return an empty mail_replica variable for users you want to exclude from replication.

Re: Crashes in dovecot -hg (86f535375750)

On 4/05/2015 11:12 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 04/28/2015 01:42 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Seems there is some breakage with -hg latest - 2.2.16 (86f535375750+). I've just had 4 core files created in short succession on both servers in the replication set. Here's the first... Does it work

Re: Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?

On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 05/03/2015 01:48 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi all, I've had an interesting use case come up which - to cut the story short - one way to solve the problem I am looking at may be to replicate a small number of mailboxes to a third remote server

Dovecot Replication - Architecture Endianness?

Hi all, I've had an interesting use case come up which - to cut the story short - one way to solve the problem I am looking at may be to replicate a small number of mailboxes to a third remote server. I've currently had replication running between my main dovecot machine and another remote

doveadm -D and -v options

According to doveadm-dsync man page the above two options are valid, but they are rejected when used: tornado # doveadm backup -v -u testuser remote:pi.me.name:4814 backup: invalid option -- 'v' doveadm backup [-u user|-A] [-S socket_path] [-fPRU] [-l secs] [-r rawlog path] [-m mailbox] [-g

Crashes in dovecot -hg (86f535375750)

Seems there is some breakage with -hg latest - 2.2.16 (86f535375750+). I've just had 4 core files created in short succession on both servers in the replication set. Here's the first... tornado reuben # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap core GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.9 vanilla) 7.9 Copyright (C) 2015

Re: [pigeonhole] disregards --with-ldap=no during compilation /usr/ports/mail/dovecot2...@fsn.hu

On 28/07/2014 12:00 AM, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:56:46 +0200, Michael Grimm stated: On 27.07.2014, at 14:46, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I like to have full control over those applications, and sometimes, I want to test new features not available in ports, yet. My production

Re: Subject tag [Dovecot] is gone

On 13/06/2014 8:09 PM, Nick Edwards wrote: On 6/11/14, Jost Krieger jost.krieger+dove...@rub.de wrote: On Wed Jun 11 12:03:24 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: Cisco routers by default mangle DNS traffic, break zone transfers or even put befor all CNAME blocks a $TTL 0 line never appeared on the

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote: The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

On 6/05/2013 12:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote: The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

On 4/05/2013 8:10 PM, Axel Luttgens wrote: Le 4 mai 2013 à 00:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit : I didn't ask what their main reason for this was, but for me it would be: Oops, I accidentally configured my new email client as POP3 instead of IMAP, and now it deleted everything from my INBOX. With

[Dovecot] Dovecot dsync mail replication issues

Hi, I'm trying to set up some dsync based replication between two hosts on my network. The current topology is a single server running Postfix with a single dovecot installation with a Maildir per user (only 4 users including myself). No NFS, just local system users on ext4. I am only