t;waiting 'failed' requests" for
the past couple of days. But I have no idea how to resolve the issue.
Suggestions welcome.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
this? (If possible, something I can
set up to run periodically in Nagios?)
Thanks for any suggestions.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
be processed
first (instead of near the end).
It matters what order the configuration files are processed in because
later files can override parameters set by earlier files.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
I am syncing two Dovecot sites using dsync. Are there any tools
available to confirm that dsync is (or is not) running properly between
the two sites? (E.g., something I could run periodically in Nagios?)
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
to the other)?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
for people to be willing to read).
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
use compatible protocol
Both servers are running the identical version of Dovecot (2.2.1), so
I'm confused as to why I would be getting a protocol mismatch. Is there
some other configuration option I need to check?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
and the connection is failing.
Finally, the Replication wiki page mentions the authorized_keys2 file,
which (AFAIK) is deprecated in the current SSH -- all authorized keys should
be in a single authorized_keys file on the target host, right?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
specific individual mail users to be replicated on a different
set of servers for each user, like what I described above.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
(with a command-line option to imapsync to put everything
in the INBOX destination namespace)?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
to make its low-level IMAP module give a full logging
of all commands and responses?
For what it may or may not be worth, I'm trying my same mail migration test
using Maildir instead of mdbox, and it appears to be working fine.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
assuming at this point that I'm going to need to see the literal,
low-level IMAP commands and responses before I can tell if this is a bug in
Dovecot, a bug in Larch, or something else.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
# 2.2.rc5
licence. (!?!)
OK, thanks for setting my mind at ease.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
Replying to e-frog:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog
Thanks. I'll try this and (hopefully) be able to tell what's going on.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
, but hopefully it will reveal something to someone here.
Let me know if you need to see other stuff in these raw logs that I didn't
mention here.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
? Or is the folders containing both messages
and sub-folders feature simply broken for the mdbox format -- meaning
presumably that I'll be forced either to use the Maildir format, or else
abandon Dovecot entirely and install Cyrus on my new mail server instead?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
While I recognize that Timo has some valid points here with regard
to determining capabilities before vs. after login, I definitely
would consider breaking compatibility with Thunderbird to be a
MAJOR, MAJOR showstopper, regardless of the reasons for doing it.
--
Rich Wales / ri...@richw.org
I never said anything about breaking Thunderbird.
Sorry if I misinterpreted your response to reg9...@yahoo.de (when
he said that your proposed change would actually just break with a
rather common client and change behaviour to all previous versions).
--
Rich Wales / ri...@richw.org / ri
switching it to Dovecot
unless I can get the nested filesystem layout working.
Any thoughts?
--
Rich Wales / ri...@richw.org / ri...@stanford.edu
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richwales
Facebook: http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=206680
19 matches
Mail list logo
