On 1/26/2024 3:02 PM, joe a wrote:
The "mailto:; function does not seem to place a copy of the sent
message in the "Sent" folder.
...so a mailbox owner might have a ready means to track messages
potentially sent under their name.
The notify action has a specific purpose - it sends a
llowed payload size for the
doveadm http api, so we can store bigger emails and attachments?
Can we store the desired allowed payload size in an env file somewhere or are
there any options to take control of the allowed payload size without changing
the source code?
Thanks in advance
Tony
g I will have to comment that out before running sysreport.
Tony
security considerations moderate how liberal one can be, but pedantic parsing
rules that make no difference only reduce the utility of the software. In any
case the logging could be more helpful if it would include the objectionable
string.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot [mai
I have a new install of dovecot 2.3.13, along with exim 4.94, in an Azure
hosted FreeBSD 12.2 VM. I have been running exim on local hardware with
FreeBSD for 15+ years, but dovecot and Azure are a new "learning
experience". I am getting an error response in dovecot.log when trying to
use the
Hi,
FWIW this was also reported back in August[1] - experienced with 2.3.2.1
(not sure if earlier 2.3 releases were affected) and currently
reproducible with latest 2.3.3 stable release.
[1] https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112548.html
Cheers,
Tony
On 2018-10-12 04:26
c,
it's just not clear to me at which version of dovecot and pigeonhole
this began with the exception of mail files which are replicating.
Cheers,
Tony
ot; ]]; then
MSG="..."
elif [[ "$DOMAIN" = "domain.me" ]]; then
MSG="..."
elif [[ "$DOMAIN" = "domain.email" ]]; then
MSG="..."
fi
Thanks for any suggestions.
Cheers,
Tony
On 2018-01-07 00:08, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 1/6/2018 om 7:42 PM schreef Florian Pritz:
What is somewhat infuriating is that this behaviour change is not
mentioned in the release notes/upgrade notes and the commit that
introduces the change changes multiple things and it doesn't explain
why
On 2018-01-02 17:21, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-02 16:37, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the
above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17
On 2018-01-02 16:37, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17187><UA2fMEQiR1ojQwAAUXb6+w>: Error:
p
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17187>: Error:
program `/usr/sbin/sendmail' was forcibly
On 2017-12-29 21:47, tony wrote:
On 2017-12-29 18:35, tony wrote:
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response
On 2017-12-29 18:35, tony wrote:
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response. The Vacation/OOO reply filter was created
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response. The Vacation/OOO reply filter was created in
Roundcubemail, but has been
1. how do I keep mails from being rejected and kept in the local
mailqueue instead? (which is the old system's behavior)?
* You can set a quota grace to basically have a soft-limit - allowing the user
to go slightly above their allocated quota.
2. what's the best (or simplest or recommended)
It does look like a client issue. Do you also have some kind of AV
running? There are some AV software that can sometimes interfere with
mail sessions. See if you might be running into a similar situation:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1066126
Cheers,
--
TC
On 9/25/17 1:27 PM,
to
dovecot.problem, then starting dovecot recreated /var/lib/dovecot. This
now results in no more errors. Everything is good again. Sorry for the
noise.
Cheers,
Tony
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-auth.conf by simply enabling
"*auth_username_format = %Lu*"
On 8/26/17 3:58 AM, Tony wrote:
> Did so
find "$home" -type f -name dovecot.index.log -delete
find "$home" -type f -name dovecot.index.log.2 -delete
systemctl start dovecot
Clearing the index files made no different as the error continues ~5 min.
I can't wrap my head around this one and am not sure what else to try.
-
hange will now warn that it most likely
won't work as intended.
Thank You,
Tony
On 8/25/17 2:39 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On August 25, 2017 at 9:11 AM Tony <tony@kode.email> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Today I started noticing a very odd Dovecot error in the mail log
ormat = %Lu*" and of course restarted Dovecot. I
really doubt this has anything to do with what I am reporting as auth is
not the problem in this case.
Thank You,
Tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You may be running up against Linux system/user limits. Run
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
and
$ ulimit -a
That should give some insight into your problem.
On 12/09/2015 2:53 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
hi
centos 6 64 bit
hex core processor with hyperthreading ie display shows 12 cores
16 gb ram
600
On 9/12/2015 10:51 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tony Morehen [mailto:tmore...@ajmconsulting.ca]
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 17:57:27 -0400
Subject: Re: concerning dovecot settings for high volume server
You may be running up against Linux system
Try turning off Apparmor. When I did the same OpenSuSE upgrade,
Apparmor messed up my dovecot installation with similar errors. I
disabled Apparmor and the permissions issues disappeared. BTW, I gave
up trying to re-configure Apparmor and have left it disabled with no
issues.
On
Sorry, I have a dovecot.list.index.log file in Maildir, but no
dovecot.list.index. Obviously, my brain is faster than my typing.
On 12/06/2015 3:38 PM, Tony Morehen wrote:
I'm trying to enable Imap Notify in Dovecot 2.2.13. I know that's a
bit out of date, but that's what's provided
= Tony@localhost
protocols = imap lmtp
service auth {
unix_listener auth-master {
group = mailgrp
mode = 0660
user = mailuser
}
}
service lmtp {
executable = lmtp -L
inet_listener lmtp {
address = 127.0.0.1
port = 2525
}
user = mailuser
}
ssl = no
userdb {
args = /etc
' hook)?
Assuming it is a bug, I modified the code in the command_exec function to stop
the second hook call, a patch for this is below. This appears to apply to
later dovecot releases as well. I am happy for this code to be included in
future releases of dovecot.
Thanks,
Tony.
diff -ur -x .deps
Am 07.11.2012 16:23, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 30.10.2012, at 7.33, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote:
-m optionalfolder, without the dot. Also you may need to set
lda_mailbox_autocreate=yes if it doesn't already exist.
Thanks Timo, that was the solution of my problem.
-lda
IMAP=$DELIVERMAIL -e -d $LOGNAME -m INBOX
ZUSATZORDNER=$DELIVERMAIL -e -d $LOGNAME -m .optionalfolder
...
dovecot-lda puts the mails for the optionalfolder always in the .cur
(INBOX).
What´s the correct dovecot-lda parameter to put the mails in the
optionalfolder?
Thank you!
Tony
: Permission denied (euid=500(tony)
egid=100(users) missing +w perm: /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb, dir owned by 0:0
mode=0755)
...
Dovecot is installed as !include auth-passwdfile.conf.ext. For all users there
is a entry in der /etc/dovecot/users.
Usaly the user rights are set to 600. I tryed 755
Bingo... It worked...
Thanks, Pascal
-tony
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of Pascal Volk
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:19 PM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Has dovecot 2.1.1 been built and tested
... (like a change to configure)???
Thanks,
-tony
Here is the output of dovecot -n:
# 2.1.1: /attic/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: AIX 1 00C30F654C00
default_login_user = dovecot
disable_plaintext_auth = no
namespace {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox {
special_use = \Drafts
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
OK, thanks -- didn't think to look there. I see that it's a pretty long list.
I'll look for a workaround unless you think a
On Dec 11, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Tony Pyro put forth on 12/10/2010 4:29 PM:
Hello,
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
. search BODY waldo
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed
Hello,
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
. search BODY waldo
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
. SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT waldo FROM waldo
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (1.768
CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE
QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS
QUOTA] Logged in
0 logout
* BYE Logging out
0 OK Logout completed.
Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!
Cheers,
Tony
~$ dovecot -n
# 1.2.15: /etc/dovecot
I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot delivers
a message into the spam mailbox, even though I have no spam filtering
enabled. I can't find anything in the wiki about other mailboxes and
POP3. I want to either never deliver mail in any mailbox other than my
default
On 10-04-04 14:07:49, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 04.04.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Tony Nelson:
I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot
delivers a message into the spam mailbox, even though I have no
spam filtering enabled.
Dovecot does not do that. Your MUA
On 10-04-04 19:59:43, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 10-04-04 14:07:49, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 04.04.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Tony Nelson:
I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot
delivers a message into the spam mailbox, even though I have no
spam filtering enabled
On 3/26/2010 4:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.3.2010, at 10.47, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
How many dovecot-auth processes were there running? Unless there were 1024
dovecot-auth processes, it sounds
more like a file descriptor leak and adding more fds will only delay the error.
as anything I've seen so far.
I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested
by anyone. If not please consider them.
Kind regards,
Marco
Well...I'll throw my silly hat into the ring:
doveman
dover
Tony
On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
Yes, hopefully it's coming soon :)
* Our #1 main motivation for
On 10-03-10 07:09:45, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2010-03-09 21:07:42 -0800, Terry Barnum wrote:
On Fri, 05.03.2010 at 09:44:35 +, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com
wrote:
I would be all in favour of a setting like this because it's
easier to configure than fail2ban...
There's also
On 10-03-04 23:43:25, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 10-03-04 20:22:15, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 3/4/10 6:42 PM -0500 Tony Nelson wrote:
Looking at the source, I see that there are no options. It
tarpits a bit, but currently has no limit on the number of
attempts. I'll see what I can do
On 10-03-03 23:01:58, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Tony Nelson put forth on 3/3/2010 2:39 PM:
Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection.
I'd like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep
the ducks at bay, but I can't find anything in /etc/dovecot.conf
On 10-03-04 00:51:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:39:28PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection.
I'd like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep
the ducks at bay,
If the firewall is the one
On 10-03-04 20:22:15, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 3/4/10 6:42 PM -0500 Tony Nelson wrote:
Looking at the source, I see that there are no options. It tarpits
a bit, but currently has no limit on the number of attempts. I'll
see what I can do.
I think it's a brilliant idea. After one login
Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection. I'd
like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep the
ducks at bay, but I can't find anything in /etc/dovecot.conf or by
googling. How do I do it? Do I need to patch the source?
dovecot-1.1.10-1.x86_64 on
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file. The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option? If there's no
configuration option, would I override allow_new_keywords to just
return FALSE?
Thanks,
Tony
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:33 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option?
Why?
Nothing to do with Dovecot...but we have other ancillary systems in play
that don't
Tony Rutherford wrote:
For testing purposes, on a small set of users, we've run the
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script. We are converting from Courier 0.43 to
Dovecot 1.2.9. For the most part, things seem to be ok. However, an iPhone
IMAP client user is reporting a problem where some of her
,
Tony
files in synch while
other 3rd parties (web, etc.) are changing the Maildirs. It seems very
reliable, and we haven't seen any problems.
Tony
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Tony Rutherford wrote:
We have our own delivery pushing messages to the /new and then /cur
folder
eventually. When I have an IMAP client attached, there is apparently
some
sort of race going on. I
an IMAP client is attached or not (except for
handling the IMAP COPY/APPEND).
Regards,
Tony
to play the hand i'm dealtTony
RutherfordSoftware EngineerBlueTie inc.arutherf...@bluetie.com(585) 586-2000
x1040-Original Message-From: Timo Sirainen [...@iki.fi]date:
12/29/2009 04:02 PMTo: Tony Rutherford CC: dove...@dovecot.orgsubject: Re:
[Dovecot] Retrieve Physical Message
Timo,
Wow..very strange on the linefeeds.
I implemented your suggestion with no problems easy enough. Thanks for chiming
in, I just didn't want to reinvent the wheel if it already existed.
Regards,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@dovecot.org
it exists, but I don't see it
offhand.Thanks,...Tony RutherfordSoftware EngineerBlueTie
inc.arutherf...@bluetie.com(585) 586-2000 x1040
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination or copying is strictly
.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Baule
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:37 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: [Dovecot] Plugins
Hello everyone again.
i try to do a plugin
, and is it even part of the Dovecot design to deal with this
scenario?
Thanks,
Tony
Thanks Brian for pointing me in the right direction...got it!
Tony
Brian Hayden wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Tony Rutherford wrote:
For migration possibilities, we're considering whether it's possible
to have Dovecot run some users using standard Maildir format, while
other users
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:07 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
For migration possibilities, we're considering whether it's possible to
have Dovecot run some users using standard Maildir format, while other
users would be using filesystem (LAYOUT=fs) format? We could
We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right now).
Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that a plugin
developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line?Thanks,Tony
This message is intended solely for the individual(s
, etc.Thanks,...Tony
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited. If you
believe you received this message in error, please notify
the sender and delete from your system. Thank
.
It seems getmail supports multidrop retriever which might fit the
bill. However I could not figure out how to set up an account that can
be used to fetch all messages for all virtual accounts. Is it possible
at all?
thanks,
Tony
PS: here is my config:
# dovecot -n
# 1.1.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
.
It seems getmail supports multidrop retriever which might fit the
bill. However I could not figure out how to set up an account that can
be used to fetch all messages for all virtual accounts. Is it possible
at all?
thanks,
Tony
PS: here is my config:
# dovecot -n
# 1.1.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
idea to at least print different errors
Tony
process is also counted as mail_process other than imap
and pop3?
Tony
-uidlist instead of using dotlock mechanism?
It is creating maintenance problems if I need to remove those stale
lock files everytime clients hit this problem
Tony.
Hi all,
I am writing a plugin to override some built-in imap commands. But
when client logs out, imap segfaults during unregistering commands.
What is the correct procedure for overriding imap commands in dovecot?
Thanks.
Tony Tsang.
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. I have used patch to UW IMAP to support
maildir, the problem is dovecot uses dot for delimiter, while the
patch for UW IMAP uses slash. So UW IMAP and dovecot have different
directory structure. If this is configurable in dovecot, it would be
nice.
Tony
73 matches
Mail list logo