On ke, 2010-06-02 at 21:44 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
Also another thought :) I guess you have now two login services for imap and
pop3, one for proxy and one for backend?
No, just the one for each right now. I haven't figured out how to do that
yet ;) Just multiple
When Dovecot is in proxy mode, the client sends along the original
connection endpoints in an ID command. Is there any chance 'doveadm who'
could use this to display the original connection source? As it
currently stands, all I see is a bunch of connections from the proxy.
Thanks!
---
Brandon
On 2.6.2010, at 23.34, Brad Davidson wrote:
When Dovecot is in proxy mode, the client sends along the original
connection endpoints in an ID command. Is there any chance 'doveadm who'
could use this to display the original connection source? As it
currently stands, all I see is a bunch of
Timo,
Is there any chance 'doveadm who'
could use this to display the original connection source?
If login_trusted_networks contains proxies, I think it should already
do
that?..
Interesting. I'd tried putting the private network in
login_trusted_networks but it got stuck in a loop until
On 3.6.2010, at 1.20, Brad Davidson wrote:
Interesting. I'd tried putting the private network in
login_trusted_networks but it got stuck in a loop until the director
process ran out of file handles, so I took it back out. This is probably
a little weird in that it's proxying to itself, and
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
..
password_query = SELECT null AS password, 'Y' AS nopassword, 'Y' AS
proxy WHERE '%{lip}' NOT LIKE '10.142.0.%%' AND '%{lip}' != '%{rip}'
This query no longer works, because both lip and rip are replaced with
the
On 3.6.2010, at 1.46, Brad Davidson wrote:
I know I'm trying to shoehorn the director into an infrastructure it's
not really meant for. A better choice would probably be to bring a new
dedicated director online in either location, and put those behind the
load balancer. I wonder if they can
On 6/2/10 7:33 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
I wonder if they can stand up to 10k+ concurrent proxied
connections though?
I'd think so.
I could probably give that a try, but I'll have a hard time convincing folks
to do that until after 2.0 has out of beta for a bit. Maybe after summer
