> On 23/12/2022 11:47 EET Eray Aslan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > We are pleased to release v2.3.20 of Dovecot.
>
> Can you confirm that CVE-2022-30550 is patched in dovecot-2.3.20? Thank
> you.
>
> --
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> We are pleased to release v2.3.20 of Dovecot.
Can you confirm that CVE-2022-30550 is patched in dovecot-2.3.20? Thank
you.
--
Eray
> On 22/12/2022 11:30 EET Markus Schönhaber
> wrote:
>
>
> 22.12.22, 09:06 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
>
> [...]
> > - replicator: Replication queue had various issues, potentially causing
> >replication requests to become stuck.
> > - stats: Invalid Prometheus label names were created with
22.12.22, 09:06 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
[...]
- replicator: Replication queue had various issues, potentially causing
replication requests to become stuck.
- stats: Invalid Prometheus label names were created with specific
[End Of Message]
Is there something missing at the end?
--
Regards
mks
We are pleased to release v2.3.20 of Dovecot.
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.20.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.20.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
Regards,
Aki Tuomi
Open-Xchange
We are pleased to release v0.5.20 of Pigeonhole.
https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.20.tar.gz
https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.20.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Docker images in https
We are pleased to release v2.3.20 of Dovecot.
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.20.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.20.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
Regards,
Aki Tuomi
Open-Xchange
> On 03/12/2022 19:41 EET Gary Horchem wrote:
>
>
> Hello I’m trying to configure Dovecot with Keycloak I’m using the proxy with
> password grant method.
>
> Here’s my dovecot-oauth2.plain.conf.ext
>
> grant_url =
> https://server-1.gary-springfield-mo.
Hello I’m trying to configure Dovecot with Keycloak I’m using the proxy with
password grant method.
Here’s my dovecot-oauth2.plain.conf.ext
grant_url =
https://server-1.gary-springfield-mo.net/realms/sso/protocol/openid-connect/token
client_id = dovecot
client_secret
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:34 PM Six002 wrote:
> Hello,
> I have ubuntu 22.04, dovecot 2.3.16 and old email client (Outlook 2013)
> and their dont support TLSv1_2.
> In dovecot 10-ssl.conf i put: ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1,
> in openssl.cnf i have:
> openssl_conf = default_con
Try setting SECLEVEL=0, also 2.3 is not officially supported by us on Ubuntu
22, so if it does not work, you'll have to bug the package maintainers.
Aki
> On 24/11/2022 12:31 EET Six002 wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I have ubuntu 22.04, dovecot 2.3.16 and old email clien
Hello,
I have ubuntu 22.04, dovecot 2.3.16 and old email client (Outlook 2013) and
their dont support TLSv1_2.
In dovecot 10-ssl.conf i put: ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1,
in openssl.cnf i have:
openssl_conf = default_conf
[ default_conf ]
ssl_conf = ssl_section
[ssl_section]
system_default
On 11/17/22 09:28, Oscar del Rio wrote:
I believe there is no Dovecot APT repo for Ubuntu 22 (yet)
https://repo.dovecot.org/
Very true. I believe I read somewhere that there will not be a Dovecot
2.3 repo for jammy, but there will be one for 2.4 when it is released.
Thanks,
Shawn
On 2022-11-17 10:26 a.m., Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 11/15/22 03:29, Markus Wienhöfer wrote:
we are currently using Dovecot 2.2 (from the Ubuntu 18.04 repos) and
would like to migrate to 2.3
I have read the migration documentation regarding the configuration
changes. Apart from
On 11/15/22 03:29, Markus Wienhöfer wrote:
we are currently using Dovecot 2.2 (from the Ubuntu 18.04 repos) and
would like to migrate to 2.3
I have read the migration documentation regarding the configuration
changes. Apart from that, is it feasible/possible to change from
Ubuntu to official
Hello,
My bad, the OS was ubuntu 20.04 and not 22.04 .
After further tinkering\testing, it seems that removing the "
acl_ignore_namespace = shared/* " setting did the trick, now we're getting
the correct ACL on client side .
Without it we can see the folder with the right permissions :
Logging
Hi,
we are currently using Dovecot 2.2 (from the Ubuntu 18.04 repos) and would like
to migrate to 2.3
I have read the migration documentation regarding the configuration changes.
Apart from that, is it feasible/possible to change from Ubuntu to official
Dovecot repositories and upgrade
Hello,
We're trying to configure the shared mailbox feature\namespace on a dovecot
2.3 installation .
OS : Ubuntu 22.04 x64
Dovecot : 2:2.3.19.1-2+ubuntu20.04
Our test enviroment is based on a dovecot frontend ( director + proxy ) and
a dovecot backend ( auth and storage ), later we
Has anybody experienced a similar problem before?
I have not, but testssl.sh might be buggy, try online service like
internet.nl validator.
Zakaria.
I have a very strange problem with one of our Dovecot servers (2.2.33.2) on
Ubuntu 18.04.
The current configuration allows for TLSv1 to TLSv1.3 connections. I can verify
those using testssl.sh, the tests will succeed (although correctly mentioning,
that TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 should be disabled
Am 14.11.22 um 10:06 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 14/11/2022 10:56 EET Ralf Becker wrote:
I found this from 2019 on the list:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78898.html
Timo mentioned it's tracked internally as DOP-1501, but I could find
nothing about it being fixed
> On 14/11/2022 10:56 EET Ralf Becker wrote:
>
>
> I found this from 2019 on the list:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78898.html
>
> Timo mentioned it's tracked internally as DOP-1501, but I could find
> nothing about it being fixed on
I found this from 2019 on the list:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78898.html
Timo mentioned it's tracked internally as DOP-1501, but I could find
nothing about it being fixed on the (public) list.
Any news about that and is the workaround of deleting
If the community has enough resources to fork the whole project, it would
probably be far more efficient and easier to just fork the Director component.
I’m not familiar enough with dovecot sources to tell if this is possible, but
if the community really wants to keep Director alive, maybe
One of our developers wrote the whole LDAP integration in Dovecot, and I for
one am not happy with this move.
Jan Hugo
On November 2, 2022 6:16:21 PM GMT+01:00, Dave McGuire
wrote:
>
> It would certainly be a shame if that sort of thing started happening with
> Dovecot. Sinc
It would certainly be a shame if that sort of thing started happening
with Dovecot. Since day one, the Dovecot community has always been very
pleasant, friendly, and drama-free. If forks start happening due to
profiteering, that will irrevocably change the Dovecot community
Which is basically what director does.
>>> It's not the same thing.
>>>
>>>> It is not critical functionality. You can feasibly run a two-node
>>>> dovecot system on NFS without having director.
>>> It seems to be critical enough to offer a replacement for paying
director does.
It's not the same thing.
It is not critical functionality. You can feasibly run a two-node
dovecot system on NFS without having director.
It seems to be critical enough to offer a replacement for paying
customers, while at the same time leaving the community edition
with no valid
s basically what director does.
>
> It's not the same thing.
>
> > It is not critical functionality. You can feasibly run a two-node
> > dovecot system on NFS without having director.
>
> It seems to be critical enough to offer a replacement for paying
> cus
can feasibly run a two-node
dovecot system on NFS without having director.
It seems to be critical enough to offer a replacement for paying
customers, while at the same time leaving the community edition
with no valid replacement.
Ciao
- Frank
also affect *any* installation with a whopping two dovecot servers
> with mdbox backends talking to a single linux NFS server as well. That's not
> exactly "Enterprise". Replication is great, but it is not a replacement for
> Director (nor is any sort of load balancing, regardless
On 2022-11-01 16:58, Mark Moseley wrote:
This *feels" to me like a parent company looking to remove features
from the open source version in order to add feature differentiation to
the paid version.
I've loved the Dovecot project for over a decade and a half. And
incidentally I have a
Frank Wall skrev den 2022-11-01 23:44:
On 2022-11-01 16:58, Mark Moseley wrote:
TL;DR:
I think the real issue here is that Dovecot is removing *existing,
long-standing, critical functionality* from the open source version.
That
is a huge, huge red flag.
It certainly looks like
On 2022-11-01 16:58, Mark Moseley wrote:
TL;DR:
I think the real issue here is that Dovecot is removing *existing,
long-standing, critical functionality* from the open source version.
That
is a huge, huge red flag.
It certainly looks like a poor decision, driven by corporate
I think the real issue here is that Dovecot is removing _existing,
long-standing, critical_ functionality from the open source version.
That is a huge, huge red flag.
Clear enough. It would be great if dovecot decides to keep it in one way
or another in community release.
TL;DR:
Sure, this affects medium/large/Enterprise folks (that's where I was using
Director -- though currently retired, so no existing self-interest in this
email).
This will also affect *any* installation with a whopping two dovecot
servers with mdbox backends talking to a single
>> only setting that works with this problem is setting default_vsz_limit to 0
>> which sounds like the lowest limit possible.
>
> A setting of 0 tells dovecot to not set a limit, at which point whatever the
> OS has set will take effect. Whenever I look at the setting for an
On 10/30/22 07:24, Doro Rose wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. In the other thread it was mentioned that the only
setting that works with this problem is setting default_vsz_limit to 0 which
sounds like the lowest limit possible.
A setting of 0 tells dovecot to not set a limit, at which
This is
> because virtual memory is just address space until something actually uses
> it, and the OS can ensure that an application that is working correctly with
> regard to virtual memory will NOT allocate too much real memory because of
> virtual memory.
>
> Dovecot is actua
memory is just address space until something actually
uses it, and the OS can ensure that an application that is working
correctly with regard to virtual memory will NOT allocate too much real
memory because of virtual memory.
Dovecot is actually the only software I have seen that has a native
On 27.10.22 04:24, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Director never worked especially well, and for most use cases it's just
unnecessarily complex. I think usually it could be replaced with:
* Database (sql/ldap/whatever) containing user -> backend table.
* Configure Dovecot proxy to use this datab
) containing user -> backend table.
* Configure Dovecot proxy to use this database as passdb.
* For HA change dovemon to update the database if backend is down to
move users elsewhere
* When backend comes up, move users into it. Set delay_until extra
field for user in passdb to 5 seconds into fut
) containing user -> backend table.
* Configure Dovecot proxy to use this database as passdb.
* For HA change dovemon to update the database if backend is down to
move users elsewhere
* When backend comes up, move users into it. Set delay_until extra
field for user in passdb to 5 seconds into fut
user -> backend table.
> * Configure Dovecot proxy to use this database as passdb.
> * For HA change dovemon to update the database if backend is down to move
> users elsewhere
> * When backend comes up, move users into it. Set delay_until extra field for
> user in passdb to 5 secon
Director never worked especially well, and for most use cases it's just
unnecessarily complex. I think usually it could be replaced with:
* Database (sql/ldap/whatever) containing user -> backend table.
* Configure Dovecot proxy to use this database as passdb.
* For HA change dove
Am 2022-10-26 11:52, schrieb Maciej Milaszewski:
Will there be a fork dovecot ?
Hm, maybe it would be possible to just fork the director component?
But it would still require a passionate C developer.
Whether LibreCot or FreeDirector will be born... I'd be happy to
support both! And don't
Maciej Milaszewski schreef op 2022-10-26 11:52:
Hi
What is the planned replacement like
doveadm director status
move / kick / flush
add /up / del
In 3.0 ?
This question has been answered in the thread.
Will there be a fork dovecot ?
If we, the community, start one, yes.
--
With kind
Hi
What is the planned replacement like
doveadm director status
move / kick / flush
add /up / del
In 3.0 ?
Will there be a fork dovecot ?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vsz_limit = 0
> --
>
> On 25 Oct 2022, at 18:13, Doro Rose wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this is a duplicate of the "Dovecot does not start on MacOS Monterey
> 12.01"
> thread.
> I’m still seeing this on dovecot 2.3.19.1. Is there a recommende
> On 26/10/2022 12:42 EEST Narcis Garcia wrote:
>
>
> El 26/10/22 a les 10:51, Aki Tuomi ha escrit:
> >
> >> On 26/10/2022 11:41 EEST Narcis Garcia wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> El 26/10/22 a les 10:29, MK ha escrit:
> >>>> T
El 26/10/22 a les 10:51, Aki Tuomi ha escrit:
On 26/10/2022 11:41 EEST Narcis Garcia wrote:
El 26/10/22 a les 10:29, MK ha escrit:
To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either. Just
the director ring feature.
To be realy clear, you are not removing the proxy
> On 26/10/2022 11:41 EEST Narcis Garcia wrote:
>
>
> El 26/10/22 a les 10:29, MK ha escrit:
> >> To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either.
> >> Just the director ring feature.
> > To be realy clear, you are not r
El 26/10/22 a les 10:29, MK ha escrit:
To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either. Just
the director ring feature.
To be realy clear, you are not removing the proxy feature in dovecot that can
be used to proxy users to different backend server on which
the users
>To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either. Just
>the director ring feature.
To be realy clear, you are not removing the proxy feature in dovecot that can
be used to proxy users to different backend server on which
the users mailboxes are stored?
Thanks
You’ve tried the following and it still fails?
`default_vsz_limit = 0`
- - -
On 25 Oct 2022, at 18:13, Doro Rose wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a duplicate of the "Dovecot does not start on MacOS Monterey 12.01"
> thread.
> I’m still seeing this on dovecot 2.3.19.1. Is there a re
Hi,
this is a duplicate of the "Dovecot does not start on MacOS Monterey 12.01"
thread.
I’m still seeing this on dovecot 2.3.19.1. Is there a recommended
workaround?
The last post in that thread indicated that some modifications in
`./src/lib/restrict-process-size.c` might be necess
On 2022-10-21 13:25, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
the problem that prevents most load balancers from handling the
backend imap/pop traffic is that the load balancer needs to be aware
of the context of each connection. which all boils down to the index
files
(only a single dovecot server can access
For the small multi-server installations I've done I have used ldap (though
another db would work) where a primary server is defined for each user.
The MTA does a lookup and uses the relevant host as destination for LMTP
delivery. For client connections, users can connect to any server; Dove
On 2022-10-21 11:38, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Apparently, Dovecot Director is going to be removed in the next major
version of Dovecot and the commercial Dovecot cluster architecture
will be its successor:
We - the communitiy - are free to continue development of the director.
So, who's
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client
http://www.trojita.flaska.net/
I also use
http://opendkim.org/
http://www.trusteddomain.org/opendmarc/
as milters on Postfix
Active development, I'm sure they could all use some help, or forks for
alternatives, I don't know, I'm not involved in
On 2022-10-11 14:05, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-10-11 13:42:
On 2022-09-13 13:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:
On 2022-10-21 10:54, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
On Oct 21, 2022, at 5:51 PM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
If mailbox is in Maildir format (and stored on shared storage like
NFS), accessing it from different server may corrupt Dovecot index
files and mailbox becomes unaccessible. Director perfectly
the problem that prevents most load balancers from handling the backend
imap/pop traffic is that the load balancer needs to be aware of the context of
each connection. which all boils down to the index files
(only a single dovecot server can access a set of index files concurrently,
else
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived +
Dovecot Director running in frontend servers, so sad we have to find
an alternative to replace Director in such case.
It's not about "small/medium" servers, but the demand of
imap/pop3/lmtp proxy service, especial
> Op 21 okt. 2022 om 19:42 heeft Brendan Braybrook het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On 2022-10-21 04:29, spi wrote:
>>> Am 21.10.22 um 13:14 schrieb Amol Kulkarni:
>>> Nginx has an mail proxy for pop, imap, smtp.
>>> Can it be used instead of director ?
>> Nginx can authenticate imap/smtp (and
On 2022-10-21 04:29, spi wrote:
Am 21.10.22 um 13:14 schrieb Amol Kulkarni:
Nginx has an mail proxy for pop, imap, smtp.
Can it be used instead of director ?
Nginx can authenticate imap/smtp (and probably pop3) users. If you that,
you can define a backend server the session is routed to.
Nginx is an excellent suggestion for the purpose. However I do not like
German client certificates. That is far too much "proof" of identification
18/21++ on a public network with nowhere to hide and those of us who are
not German citizens and do not have the advantage of a friendly local
be the fore-person\traffic-cop keeping things
organized & squared-away.
Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a load-balance cluster,
proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot servers.
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + Dov
To be clear, you are removing the Director...
---
Tom
On 2022-10-21 13:28, Aki Tuomi wrote:
To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either.
Just the director ring feature.
Aki
On 21/10/2022 14:14 EEST Amol Kulkarni wrote:
Nginx has an mail proxy for pop, imap
Am 21.10.22 um 13:14 schrieb Amol Kulkarni:
Nginx has an mail proxy for pop, imap, smtp.
Can it be used instead of director ?
Nginx can authenticate imap/smtp (and probably pop3) users. If you that,
you can define a backend server the session is routed to. Currently I
use that approach to
To be clear, we are not removing proxying features from Dovecot either. Just
the director ring feature.
Aki
> On 21/10/2022 14:14 EEST Amol Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> Nginx has an mail proxy for pop, imap, smtp.
> Can it be used instead of director ?
>
>
> On Fri, 21 O
chieve the same implementation with
> >> haproxy without dovecot director?
> >
> > The most important part of Director is it makes sure same mail user
> > always proxied to same backend IMAP server.
> >
> > If mailbox is in Maildir format (and stored on shared
On 2022-10-21 10:51, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
On Oct 21, 2022, at 5:23 PM, hi@zakaria.website wrote:
I was wondering if one can achieve the same implementation with
haproxy without dovecot director?
The most important part of Director is it makes sure same mail user
always proxied to same
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 5:51 PM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
>
> If mailbox is in Maildir format (and stored on shared storage like NFS),
> accessing it from different server may corrupt Dovecot index files and
> mailbox becomes unaccessible. Director perfectly avoids this issu
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 5:23 PM, hi@zakaria.website wrote:
>
> I was wondering if one can achieve the same implementation with haproxy
> without dovecot director?
The most important part of Director is it makes sure same mail user always
proxied to same backend IMAP server.
Steff Majeur (Do 20 Okt 2022 11:24:49 CEST):
> I recently stumbled upon the following commit on the Dovecot core Github
> repository:
> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/4a187116dc2311804be22724007d357323005358
>
> Apparently, Dovecot Director is going to be removed in
be the
fore-person\traffic-cop keeping things organized & squared-away.
Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a load-balance
cluster, proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot
servers.
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived +
Dov
> servers.
> >
> > I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived +
> Dovecot Director running in frontend servers, so sad we have to find an
> alternative to replace Director in such case.
The code is still available you just need to build
be the fore-person\traffic-cop keeping things
organized & squared-away.
Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a load-balance cluster,
proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot servers.
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + Dov
ay.
Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a
load-balance cluster, proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests
to backend Dovecot servers.
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy +
KeepAlived + Dovecot Director running in frontend servers, so
sad we have to find
load-balance cluster,
> proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot servers.
>
> I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + Dovecot
> Director running in frontend servers, so sad we have to find an alternative
> to replace Director
fic-cop keeping
> things organized & squared-away.
Director is used when you setup frontend servers in a load-balance cluster,
proxy imap/pop3/lmtp/managesieve requests to backend Dovecot servers.
I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + Dovecot
Director running i
0300 (EEST)
Most small/medium servers do not need director. You can use
replicator
get a pri/bu pair.
I've never needed to use replicator. I don't even know what a pri/bu
pair is. I just have fetchmail feed to procmail which delivers
messages
into my Dovecot maildir, and then access the Dov
to me like nothing there applies
to my Dovecot setup. I'll be checking it from time to time.
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
Summer 2022 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times
http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore/thrive.htm
't even know what a pri/bu
> pair is. I just have fetchmail feed to procmail which delivers messages
> into my Dovecot maildir, and then access the Dovecot IMAP server with
> an email client. Hopefully I'll be able to continue doing it this way.
>
> >
> >Only the director part i
ssages
into my Dovecot maildir, and then access the Dovecot IMAP server with
an email client. Hopefully I'll be able to continue doing it this way.
>
>Only the director part is being removed, rest of Dovecot remains. For
>the next major release we are also removing certain deprecated p
> Most small/medium servers do not need director. You can use replicator
> get a pri/bu pair.
>
What is small?
Most small/medium servers do not need director. You can use replicator get a
pri/bu pair.
Only the director part is being removed, rest of Dovecot remains. For the next
major release we are also removing certain deprecated parts that have a
replacement in elsewhere of the code.
The mail
I'm top posting because I can't make heads or tails of this thread.
Does this thread mean that Dovecot will no longer be Free Software?
It appears that only Dovecot Director will be taken proprietary, but if
all of Dovecot is in jeopardy, I need to switch to another local IMAP
server program
> On 20/10/2022 12:24 EEST Steff Majeur wrote:
>
>
> I recently stumbled upon the following commit on the Dovecot core Github
> repository:
> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/4a187116dc2311804be22724007d357323005358
>
> Apparently, Dovecot Director is going t
I recently stumbled upon the following commit on the Dovecot core Github
repository:
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/4a187116dc2311804be22724007d357323005358
Apparently, Dovecot Director is going to be removed in the next major version
of Dovecot and the commercial Dovecot cluster
Hi!
This has now been fixed with
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/41cc1bd9538b68fa874f9e7a3cd02cbc2cd33f09.patch
Aki
> On 11/10/2022 10:21 EEST Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> This seems to be a bug in imapc client, we'll look into this. Thank you for
> repor
I wonder if I can just copy the compiled binaries over to the working
server? Or should I build a new server from scratch and compile Dovecot
again? If it's possible to copy over, which files will be required? Just
'dovecot'? Also, in my testing environment I used a Dovecot apt package
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
> De: Tanstaafl
> Objet: Rép. : adding caldav/carddav next to dovecot
> Date: 15 octobre 2022 à 16:11:43 UTC+2
> À: infoomatic , dovecot@dovecot.org
>
> A HUGE second for SOGo
>
> We used it for many years in a Gent
On 2022-10-14 14:13, Marc wrote:
I hope it is ok to post this off-topic question here. I was wondering
if there are here environments running that offer next to dovecot also
calendar and contacts services.
In the past I was testing a bit with the one from Apple, but I think it
is being
On 2022-10-14 14:13, Marc wrote:
I hope it is ok to post this off-topic question here. I was wondering
if there are here environments running that offer next to dovecot also
calendar and contacts services.
In the past I was testing a bit with the one from Apple, but I think it
is being
El 16/10/22 a les 12:21, Marc ha escrit:
Tanstaafl skrev den 2022-10-15 16:11:
A HUGE second for SOGo
https://www.horde.org/
We used it for many years in a Gentoo/Dovecot/Postfix environment.
horde is missing in gentoo now :/
Maybe it is old fashioned or even modern. But I like
~ 2K users, with radicale running alongside dovecot/fts-
If I may ask, how many requests per second are these 2k users generate? I have
currently created some script in bash to do caldav puts/gets. But I seem to be
hitting the limits of the script, and I do not know of any tool that can alter
and put content.
>
> Tanstaafl skrev den 2022-10-15 16:11:
> > A HUGE second for SOGo
>
> https://www.horde.org/
>
> > We used it for many years in a Gentoo/Dovecot/Postfix environment.
>
> horde is missing in gentoo now :/
Maybe it is old fashioned or even modern. But I like
DAV.
> Standard Sabre DAV has its own user database. We extended the SabreDAV
> authentication mechanism such that user-credentials are pulled from the
> same database that Dovecot is using.
>
I would prefer ldap
501 - 600 of 59905 matches
Mail list logo
