It works, thank you very much !
What can I say, this is a shining example of what's good with open-source.
Eric
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:30 +0100, Eric Marin wrote:
So far, so good, except that for *some* users (and I can't seem to find anything unusual about their
Hello all,
We've recently migrated the mail server used by our 5000 students, from
Tru64/UW-IMAP/Procmail/Postfix/mbox to Debian Etch/Dovecot/Deliver/Postfix/Maildir
E-mails are not stored directly on the server (except for index and control files), but on an NAS
that exports the students'
Eric Marin wrote:
So for *some* users, it seems that Deliver doesn't detect that there
isn't enough space, it tries to write the e-mail and of course fails,
then reports an error, and Postfix interprets this as a temporary
error and retries later.
Without knowing anything about the problem
Hi,
unfortunately, for those users that cause problem, even if the user is completely over-quota (say
900MB of files for a 100MB quota) *before* adding the small mail, Deliver still reports an fsync
failure.
Eric
Ed W a écrit :
Eric Marin wrote:
So for *some* users, it seems that Deliver
Hi,
Joseba Torre a écrit :
Hi,
El Jueves, 6 de Noviembre de 2008 a las 11:30, Eric Marin escribió:
- should I use the quota:fs plugin in this case (it seems to work out well
without it for most users) ?
quota:fs is only about reporting quota status using IMAP. So, it should do no
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:30 +0100, Eric Marin wrote:
So far, so good, except that for *some* users (and I can't seem to find
anything unusual about their
account), one gets this in /var/log/mail.log :
Nov 6 10:42:24 vega deliver(studentx):
Joseba Torre a écrit :
HTH
Unfortunately, I don't think this can be the cause because we defined
quotas globally on the NAS : only one line defines the quota for all
students...
And it can't handle per user exceptions?
Agur.
Well, yes it can, of course :-) What I meant was that
Hi,
El Jueves, 6 de Noviembre de 2008 a las 11:30, Eric Marin escribió:
- should I use the quota:fs plugin in this case (it seems to work out well
without it for most users) ?
quota:fs is only about reporting quota status using IMAP. So, it should do no
diference in this case.
- would it
