2017-03-23 9:52 GMT+01:00 Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@dovecot.fi>:
> 2.2.9 is rather old. Updating to a more recent version could help.
>
> Aki
>
>
> On 23.03.2017 10:48, Kein Name wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I am running an Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Server with
2.2.9 is rather old. Updating to a more recent version could help.
Aki
On 23.03.2017 10:48, Kein Name wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am running an Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Server with Dovecot 2.2.9, only local
> filesystems and authentication done via mysql backend.
> Server is a Strato
Hello List,
I am running an Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Server with Dovecot 2.2.9, only local
filesystems and authentication done via mysql backend.
Server is a Strato Virtual Server running
2.6.32-042stab120.11 #1 SMP Fri Mar 10 16:52:50 MSK 2017 i686 i686 i686
GNU/Linux
Sometimes I see errors
> Version of Postix: postfix_2.11.3-1ubuntu1_amd64
> > Version of Dovecot: 2.2.9
> > Operations system is: Ubuntu 15.04 x64
> >
> > Postfix have patched (patch VDA - http://vda.sourceforge.net) for using
> > with quota, it means that file "maildirsize" in mail dir
Version of Postix: postfix_2.11.3-1ubuntu1_amd64
> Version of Dovecot: 2.2.9
> Operations system is: Ubuntu 15.04 x64
>
> Postfix have patched (patch VDA - http://vda.sourceforge.net) for using
> with quota, it means that file "maildirsize" in mail directory already
> exis
Hi.
I have Dovecot + Postfix + MySQL.
Version of Postix: postfix_2.11.3-1ubuntu1_amd64
Version of Dovecot: 2.2.9
Operations system is: Ubuntu 15.04 x64
Postfix have patched (patch VDA - http://vda.sourceforge.net) for using
with quota, it means that file "maildirsize" in mail directo
Real quota values (from quotactl) are fetched very late,
>>> in quota_warnings_execute() but at that point no recalculation happens. As
>>> the warning rules have bytes_limit==0, they're effectively ignored.
>>>
>>> The patch below enables quota warnings to be sen
-based) quotas.
Based and tested on Ubuntu 14.04's dovecot 2.2.9.
Best regards,
Grzegorz Nosek
diff --git a/src/plugins/quota/quota.c b/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
index adbd70d..8e4d7e0 100644
--- a/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
+++ b/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static void
's dovecot 2.2.9.
Best regards,
Grzegorz Nosek
diff --git a/src/plugins/quota/quota.c b/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
index adbd70d..8e4d7e0 100644
--- a/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
+++ b/src/plugins/quota/quota.c
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static void quota_warnings_execute(struct
() but at that point no recalculation
happens. As the warning rules have bytes_limit==0, they're effectively
ignored.
The patch below enables quota warnings to be sent when using filesystem
(and possibly maildirsize-based) quotas.
Based and tested on Ubuntu 14.04's dovecot 2.2.9.
Best regards,
Grzegorz
/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem
ssl_verify_client_cert = yes
verbose_ssl = yes
OS is Debian Wheezy with latest updates and (just today in hopes it had
been fixed, same error occurs with Wheezy's dovecot = 2.1.7) dovecot
2.2.9 from backports.
amd64 architecture.
Please CC me as I am not subscribed
On 10/02/2014 05:23 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
Now, the only problem I see is that when I attempt to create a new
folder beneath the Inbox (whether it contains a . or not), the folder
appears at the root-level of the IMAP account, at the same level as the
Inbox itself. The folder name is INBOX.My
On 10/01/2014 09:43 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
Ultimately, I have two questions:
1.) Is the nesting structure that I've employed correct? The Wiki 2 page
is not clear with regard to the nesting; is it correct to put the
namespace block inside the protocol imap block, as I demonstrated above?
I
On 10/2/2014 9:57 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 10/01/2014 09:43 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
Ultimately, I have two questions:
1.) Is the nesting structure that I've employed correct? The Wiki 2 page
is not clear with regard to the nesting; is it correct to put the
namespace block inside the
Hello,
I'm attempting to install the listescape plugin so that IMAP users are
able to include periods (.) and forward slashes (/) in IMAP directory names.
I'm following the instructions at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Listescape , which imply that this can
be accomplished by enabling the
Hi all,
When trying to set up dovecot, I somehow managed to get a segfault.
Trying to launch dovecot from command line (simply execute 'dovecot')
results in the error message:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Trying dovecot -n results in pretty much the same:
# 2.2.9:
Am 28.07.2014 09:44, schrieb Simon Gareste:
When trying to set up dovecot, I somehow managed to get a segfault. Trying to
launch dovecot from command line
(simply execute 'dovecot') results in the error message:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Trying dovecot -n results in pretty much the
Am 28.07.2014 09:44, schrieb Simon Gareste:
One difference I noticed between the two servers is that on the failing one,
there is
no /var/run/dovecot. I presume this folder and its files are created once
dovecot is
launched, so that's why it's not present, and is only a symptom of the
Le 28/07/2014 12:14, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 28.07.2014 09:44, schrieb Simon Gareste:
When trying to set up dovecot, I somehow managed to get a segfault. Trying to
launch dovecot from command line
(simply execute 'dovecot') results in the error message:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Am 28.07.2014 12:33, schrieb Simon Gareste:
Le 28/07/2014 12:14, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 28.07.2014 09:44, schrieb Simon Gareste:
When trying to set up dovecot, I somehow managed to get a segfault. Trying
to launch dovecot from command line
(simply execute 'dovecot') results in the error
Simon Gareste wrote:
This outdated version is the one packaged in Ubuntu LTS 14.04.1,
which I believe I'm not the only one using. Updating the dovecot packages
provided by Ubuntu would certainly help.
If Ubuntu packages segfault, you should file a bug report at Ubuntu Launchpad:
Am 2014-05-11 10:16, schrieb Alexandru Bostina:
Hello,
It seems that Dovecot ignores the new /ssl_cert and ssl_key /settings.
Using them in the dovecot configuration results in the error:
Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: Expecting:
inline: logo (1).png
I didn't get it.
What's wrong ?
What's not working?
-Original Message-
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Франчук Олег
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:37 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.9 replication
Good afternoon, I have
On 3/12/2014 9:00 AM, Костырев Александр Алексеевич
a.kosty...@serverc.ru wrote:
Good afternoon, I have a problem with replication is configured in
Dovecot, I have two servers, they are version 2.2.9. Here is their
configuration
/root@mx1:/etc/dovecot# dovecot -n//
//# 2.2.9:
Hello,
I'm trying to load the mail-filter plugin (dovecot-2.2.9) with the
following option in 10-mail.conf : mail_plugins = $mail_plugins mail_filter
But I've got the following error when restarting dovecot : dovecot: imap:
Fatal: Plugin 'mail_filter' not found from directory /usr/local/lib
On 7.12.2013, at 6.35, Philippe Lelédy dove...@leledy.fr wrote:
doveconf -n
# 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
doveconf: Fatal: pool_system_realloc(536870912): Out of memory
Maybe this shows where it’s failing:
DEBUG_OUTOFMEM=1 gdb —args doveconf -n
bt full
Hi,
First I have this warning when configuring:
configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: sys/ucred.h:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
.
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/luuk/source/dovecot-2.2.9/src/anvil'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib/dovecot'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c anvil
On 25-11-2013 19:36, Luuk wrote:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
.
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/luuk/source/dovecot-2.2.9/src/anvil'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib/dovecot'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode
On 11/25/13 01:40 PM, Luuk wrote:
On 25-11-2013 19:36, Luuk wrote:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
.
/usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth'
/usr/bin/mkdir: cannot create directory
On 25.11.2013, at 19.36, Luuk dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
Don’t use the same directory for libexecdir and moduledir.
-libunwind
--with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic --build=i586-suse-linux
libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/lib'
luuk@asus:~/source/dovecot-2.2.9 grep -ir moduledir config.log
moduledir='${exec_prefix}/lib/dovecot'
luuk@asus:~/source/dovecot-2.2.9
They seem to be different:
libexecdir='${exec_prefix
create directory ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’:
File exists
any tips on what i did wrong?
i'm able to provide more info,
if only i knew what info is needed ;)
ls -ld /usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth
luuk@asus:~/source/dovecot-2.2.9 ls -ld /usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1356716
Am 25.11.2013 20:31, schrieb Luuk:
On 25-11-2013 20:04, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.11.2013, at 19.36, Luuk dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
Don’t use the same directory for libexecdir and
On 25-11-2013 20:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.11.2013 20:31, schrieb Luuk:
On 25-11-2013 20:04, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.11.2013, at 19.36, Luuk dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
while doing 'sudo make install',
its complaining about the existance of ‘/usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth’
Don’t use
I wonder if you have the balls to send to that him so he can see it,
he did say he unsubscribed
all to often I see heros like you, you're like the bitchy kid who
waits for someone to walk out the room then bitch about them.
On 11/23/13, Rick Romero r...@havokmon.com wrote:
Noel,
I include you
On 11/24/13, Andreas Kasenides andr...@cymail.eu wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
On 11/24/13, Luuk dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any
official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most
I second this
On 11/24/13, Eugene ge...@geniechka.ru wrote:
Hi all,
In recent years I use dovecot installed from FreeBSD ports. Interestingly, I
feel that they follow the dovecot releases rather well but with some lag,
e.g. currently it is at 2.2.6. I don't know if that is 'by design' or caused
by lack
On 11/22/2013 7:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Everyone replying to this thread really should just shut up. I (and likely
just about nobody else) don’t care who is more wrong or more right or a
better or worse person or whatever, but any mails that have nothing to do
with Dovecot don’t belong
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 01:10:04AM -0700, Eric Broch wrote:
On 11/22/2013 7:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
(And as for the original question: I’ll make v2.2.9 this weekend. And as
for bugs, as I already once mentioned, I’m planning on implementing
significantly more comprehensive testing
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html
Pigeonhole
On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any
official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most
I second this and offer my services for two, three different
On 23-11-2013 19:56, Luuk wrote:
On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote:
These would be found if Timo reverted back to issuing RC's before any
official release, to iron out the niggly off-putting bugs, like most
I second this and offer my
On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Andreas Kasenides andr...@cymail.eu wrote:
RC means exactly what is says Release Client :) NOT a release.
Release Candidate, not Client. A candidate to be the final release unless a
late bug is found.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.
Best wishes
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Kasenides
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 10:24 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 2.2.9
On 23-11-2013 19:56, Luuk wrote:
On 23-11-2013 18:44, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
On 23-11-2013 3:47, Noel Butler wrote
On 2013-11-23 19:08, Eugene wrote:
Also, I am not sure RCs as such would do much good, since most of the
test systems are not likely to reproduce the volume and diversity of
production workloads.
Perhaps, then, a simple 'click for thumbs up' approach on the web site,
to say I have installed
Am 23.11.2013 20:08, schrieb Eugene:
In recent years I use dovecot installed from FreeBSD ports. Interestingly, I
feel that they follow the dovecot
releases rather well but with some lag, e.g. currently it is at 2.2.6. I
don't know if that is 'by design' or
caused by lack of manpower, but
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html
Pigeonhole related patches.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html
Pigeonhole related patches.
Damn. Those are biting me as well :/
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT |
Reuben Farrelly skrev den 2013-11-22 09:37:
its a free world, any one can provide a patch if wanted to fix
something, but if it aint broke, dont fix it
i have my silly choices, but seems from maillist here its good choices
of keep 1.x still, and lucky i have a distro where its posible
On 11/22/13, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 07:20:
Timo (since he is the only one that maters here),
so it should have being private mail ?
No Timo made it clear all dovecot stuff must go by list
that sayed i keep dovecot 1.x as the most recent stable
Am 22.11.2013 17:17, schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 11/22/13, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 07:20:
Timo (since he is the only one that maters here),
so it should have being private mail ?
No Timo made it clear all dovecot stuff must go by list
that
Am 22.11.2013 17:17, schrieb Nick Edwards:
what the fuck are you rambling about now? jesus christ, shut the fuck
up and stop popping your dumb comments in when you have no fucking
clue, this has nothing to do with 1 v 2 or some crap that your dumb
arse delusional trolling mouth spills out
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 17:17:
I need a drink
if you can find some to drink with, all problems with dovecot will
comeback tomorrow :=)
i just made another sieve rule now
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 02:29 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 17:17:
I need a drink
if you can find some to drink with, all problems with dovecot will
comeback tomorrow :=)
i just made another sieve rule now
What has this to do with dovecot? Take
Am 23.11.2013 02:29, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Nick Edwards skrev den 2013-11-22 17:17:
I need a drink
if you can find some to drink with, all problems with dovecot will comeback
tomorrow :=)
so why are you subscribed here?
you permanently attack dovecot itself on the dovecot list
i just
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 10:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de 2013.11.22 09:44:
Which patch?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093654.html
Pigeonhole related patches.
Damn. Those
Everyone replying to this thread really should just shut up. I (and likely just
about nobody else) don’t care who is more wrong or more right or a better or
worse person or whatever, but any mails that have nothing to do with Dovecot
don’t belong to this list. I have no interest in being some
Thanks for providing and maintaining a great piece of software.
Rick
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 04:06 +0200, Timo Sirainen In-Reply-To:
1385170783.4058.5.camel@tardis wrote:
but there are about 3 of you who nowadays constantly seem to be wasting my
time on thinking about it.
no doubt, despite my one single post to them in long time, but being
informed that my
Noel,
I include you in the gang of three, and I only read half the posts on this
list. I have no specific reason to, but it isn't a good association.
A decade ago I was active on the Pegasus mail and Mercury lists, and names
stood out after a while. Unfortunately on this list, the names stand
63 matches
Mail list logo
