On 19/02/2010 23:51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Rodolfo Gonzalez put forth on 2/19/2010 5:18 PM:
Hi,
This might be a silly question: which would be
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4
Rodolfo Gonzalez put forth on 2/19/2010 5:18 PM:
Hi,
This might be a silly question: which would be
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 called news with inode_ratio = 4096, and after
Hi!
On Fre, 2010-02-19 at 17:18 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
[...]
This might be a silly question: which would be
Not at all IMHO.
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 called news
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If your version of Ubuntu server has XFS support built in, forget ext4 and go
XFS. It's more reliable, faster in every single benchmark I've seen
especially
for large numbers of files, both large and small, has a ton of management
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better than
using EXT4 though, why on earth anyone would use that on a serious
production server I'll never know.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:51 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If
Noel Butler wrote:
Agree wth XFS, providing, and a big providing, you have reliable
and guaranteed power, hard powerouts on XFS are not known for their
niceness and protection of data
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better
than using EXT4 though, why on earth
Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez put forth on 2/20/2010 12:18 AM:
I used to have the maildirs on ReiserFS and never had a problem with it,
but given the current state of that FS and that I weren't really
comfortable with it, I'll give XFS a try for the maildir array and the
postfix queue partition.
