Re: [Dovecot] Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.

2012-04-23 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 10.4.2012, at 23.50, Glenn Wurster wrote: Yes, modseqs aren't tracked in a mailbox until client expresses an interest for them. It would be a waste of disk space to save them since 99% of users don't need them. Makes sense, our mail client gets caught in the middle though, because it

[Dovecot] Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.

2012-04-10 Thread Glenn Wurster
Greetings, I'm new to the list. I have encountered what I believe to be a bug in the return of HIGHESTMODSEQ when talking to a IMAP client. HIGHESTMODSEQ does not appear to be incrementing when a new message arrives. The exact steps I took are: 1) Create a new mail account 2) Send a mail

Re: [Dovecot] Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.

2012-04-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 10.4.2012, at 20.17, Glenn Wurster wrote: It appears as if HIGHESTMODSEQ is not being updated. I can get HIGHESTMODSEQ to start updating correctly if I send a UID FETCH 1 MODSEQ or similar command, which appears to enable MODSEQ tracking at the server (according to the comment around

Re: [Dovecot] Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.

2012-04-10 Thread Glenn Wurster
Yes, modseqs aren't tracked in a mailbox until client expresses an interest for them. It would be a waste of disk space to save them since 99% of users don't need them. Makes sense, our mail client gets caught in the middle though, because it uses HIGHESTMODSEQ to track mailbox updates