Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2011-11-09 Thread Peter Mogensen
On 2011-11-04 22:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (t...@aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2: indexid changed 1320419300 - 1320419441 (sync_offset=0) Session A had TestMails open and created with index

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2011-11-05 Thread Peter Mogensen
On 2011-11-04 22:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (t...@aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2: indexid changed 1320419300 - 1320419441 (sync_offset=0) Session A had TestMails open and created with index

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2011-11-04 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 20:23 +0100, Peter Mogensen wrote: I'm running Dovecot 2.0.15 and have a client which keeps causing log-entries like: Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (t...@aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2:

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-27 Thread Andre Nathan
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: They're not happening all the time. It showed up two or three times in the logs during the night. A few errors of this kind appeared in the logs last night. The Log synchronization error appears more frequently than Corrupted transaction

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-27 Thread Andre Nathan
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Have you set mmap_disable=yes? Yep. Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for performance reasons? OCFS2 claims to support mmap:

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-27 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 27.10.2010, at 15.48, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Have you set mmap_disable=yes? Yep. Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for performance reasons? OCFS2

[Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-26 Thread Andre Nathan
Hello I run dovecot 2.0.6 on a two-machine cluster using OCFS2 as the file system. I have some error messages like these in my log: Oct 25 01:07:50 box5 dovecot: lmtp(8886, suporte=100br@lmtp1.prv.f1.k8.com.br): Error: Corrupted transaction log file

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-26 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 26.10.2010, at 19.58, Andre Nathan wrote: I run dovecot 2.0.6 on a two-machine cluster using OCFS2 as the file system. I have some error messages like these in my log: Oct 25 01:07:50 box5 dovecot: lmtp(8886, suporte=100br@lmtp1.prv.f1.k8.com.br): Error: Corrupted transaction log

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file

2010-10-26 Thread Andre Nathan
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Have you set mmap_disable=yes? Yep. Those errors should fix themselves automatically. Still, it's not very good if they keep happening. Sooner or later they will cause user visible problems. They're not happening all the time. It

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-18 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 19:20 -0400, Steven Winikoff wrote: Oct 3 17:52:21 alcor dovecot: imap[14973] , NNN.NNN.NN.NNN: Corrupted transaction log file /home//mail/.imap/sent-mail/dovecot.index.log: record size too small (type=0xcd91, offset=8180, size=0) This and some other bugs

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-18 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:22 -0400, Steven Winikoff wrote: Oct 10 04:48:46 alcor dovecot: Panic: pop3-login: file client-authenticate.c: line 163 (sasl_callback): assertion failed: (!client-destroyed || reply == SASL_SERVER_REPLY_CLIENT_ERROR || reply == SASL_SERVER_REPLY_MASTER_FAILED)

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-18 Thread Steven Winikoff
This and some other bugs are now fixed by this: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/262c52055f2a Thank you! Both for this and for http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/a0693aec0245 - Steven Steven Winikoff

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-10 Thread Steven Winikoff
2) recompiled dovecot without optimization (ie, gcc -O0 instead of -O2) (as per http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg12936.html) The problem here turned out to be a bug in Sun CC (and gcc -O2 apparently worked after all, so maybe a problem with testing). Thanks. I'll

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Oct 10, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Steven Winikoff wrote: I had hoped v1.1.3 would have fixed this. But perhaps this is also related to the disk quota issues. Are there any other errors that are logged before the assert? Nothing obvious, I'm afraid. For example, this occurence is typical of the

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-10 Thread Steven Winikoff
[...] Oct 8 13:56:40 alcor dovecot: Panic: imap[15143] USER4, NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN: file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close): assertion failed: (!mail-data.destroying_stream) Hmm. I think I thought of a different assert before when commenting. This assert should be fixed by 1.1.4 /

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 02:08 -0400, Steven Winikoff wrote: Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3[5006] , NNN.NNN.NN.NNN: Corrupted transaction log file /home//.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log: record size too small (type=0x40, offset=12224, size=0) .. I've been working around the

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-10-05 Thread Steven Winikoff
I've been working around the problem by deleting the contents of ~user/.imap for affected users, but I'd really prefer to fix it properly. :-) Any suggestions would be gratefully received. I think this should get fixed by itself? Although the first login fails, the next one should succeed.

[Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small

2008-09-30 Thread Steven Winikoff
I recently upgradeded dovecot on one of our servers from version 1.0.10 to version 1.1.3. Ever since, we've been seeing occasional errors similar to this sequence (with the username and IP addresses elided): Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3-login: Login: [4954], , NNN.NNN.NN.NNN

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted Transaction Log File: v1.0.7

2007-12-07 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:33 +, Daniel Watts wrote: Following errors have happened quite a bit: Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Transaction log file /home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log: marked corrupted

[Dovecot] Corrupted Transaction Log File: v1.0.7

2007-12-07 Thread Daniel Watts
Following errors have happened quite a bit: Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Transaction log file /home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log: marked corrupted Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted Transaction Log File: v1.0.7

2007-12-07 Thread Daniel Watts
[snip] Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Corrupted transaction log file /home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 50, but next_uid = 15870 This is the real error. What kind of a system do you

Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted Transaction Log File: v1.0.7

2007-12-07 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:01 +, Daniel Watts wrote: Shouldn't Dovecot be able to recover from this? It does, that's why there are those marked corrupted errors. But it probably does cause the current operation to fail. v1.1 handles this by logging the error but continuing