On 18.4.2012, at 1.29, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
On 03/30/12 07:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
IP stickiness isn't enough if user uses more than one IMAP client, which is
pretty common nowadays. And doesn't help at all with LDA.
Timo, having the LDA flow through the director with maildir and NFS is
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:02:02PM +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do LB/HA.
But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that there
are two directors and it should/can use the other one
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)-- backend1 --\
-- director -- -- NFS
MTA --(lmtp)--/ \--(lmtp)-- backend2 --/
IMAP-User -- frontend1 --\
On 4.4.2012, at 14.38, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)-- backend1 --\
-- director -- -- NFS
MTA --(lmtp)--/
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do LB/HA.
But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that there
are two directors and it should/can use the other one if the
first is down?
Now I use relay_transport =
On 4.4.2012, at 15.02, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do LB/HA.
But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that there are
two directors and it should/can use the other one if the
first is
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:06:29 +0300
Timo Sirainen articulated:
On 4.4.2012, at 15.02, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do
LB/HA.
But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that
there
On 4.4.2012, at 15.29, Jerry wrote:
Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp.
Even if I change this to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 it is still only one
director.
I don't know if Postfix supports that. Typically people use a load
balancer (cluster).
Perhaps posting on the
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 4.4.2012, at 15.29, Jerry wrote:
Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp.
Even if I change this to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 it is still only one
director.
I don't know if Postfix supports that. Typically people use a load
balancer
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server handles
load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and Postfix handles fallbacking
to the second IP if the first one doesn't work. Dovecot has similar behavior in
several places.
As far as I
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server handles
load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and Postfix handles
fallbacking to the second IP if the first one doesn't work. Dovecot has
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS
server handles load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and
Postfix handles fallbacking to the second IP if the
On 4.4.2012, at 16.57, Patrick Domack wrote:
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server
handles load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Nick Warr schrieb:
I think some of the new Dovecot (director?) software is user aware, but
I don't know if it's quite ready for production.
Yes, with director it should be something like that:
MTA --(lmtp)--\
Patrick Westenberg schrieb:
Nick Warr schrieb:
I think some of the new Dovecot (director?) software is user aware, but
I don't know if it's quite ready for production.
Yes, with director it should be something like that:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)-- backend1 --\
-- director -- -- NFS
MTA
Hi everyone,
as I have often trouble with OCFS2 I want to switch to NFS but
I'm not sure how to rebuild my cluster with regard to locking
and indexing problems.
By now my I have a four server configuration (there are another 2
servers for outgoing mail but they can be ignored):
MTA(MX10)
Il 30/03/2012 13.31, Patrick Westenberg ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
as I have often trouble with OCFS2 I want to switch to NFS but
I'm not sure how to rebuild my cluster with regard to locking
and indexing problems.
By now my I have a four server configuration (there are another 2
servers for
On 30.3.2012, at 15.38, Nick Warr wrote:
As far as I understood I will get poor performance if I'd just switch
from OCFS2 to NFS (while keeping this configuration) with 4 hosts
accessing the NFS-share and the index files on it and it is recommended
to assign users to a specific host
Nick Warr schrieb:
I think some of the new Dovecot (director?) software is user aware, but
I don't know if it's quite ready for production.
Yes, with director it should be something like that:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)-- backend1 --\
-- director --
19 matches
Mail list logo
