On 01/23/2014 07:11 PM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> IIRC, No. Kolab uses the mailbox-level METADATA extension instead (RFC
> 5464).
RFC5257 is for message annotations (not folder/mailbox annotations), so
it is a different thing. Kolab does not use it. Anyway there are not
many servers supporting R
Quoting Ed W :
Hi
And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch
of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations.
Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this
time (RFC 5464).
michael
Yes, I know, but for groupware collab
Hi
And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch
of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations.
Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this
time (RFC 5464).
michael
Yes, I know, but for groupware collaboration on mails,
On Mi, 2014-01-22 at 14:14 -0700, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Quoting Robert Schetterer :
>
> > Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to
>
Quoting Robert Schetterer :
Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow:
Hello,
Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to
implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this
feature?
Rega
Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow:
> Hello,
>
> Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to
> implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this
> feature?
>
> Regards
> Sebastian
Hello,
Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to
implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this
feature?
Regards
Sebastian
