Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-26 Thread Frank Cusack
On April 26, 2007 8:59:43 AM +0200 Eyvind Bernhardsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 25. apr. 2007, at 20.06, Robert Schetterer wrote: Hi, as i have one customer on courier only with apple mail i got known of so many bugs with imap that i must say this is a broken client in my eyes I don't

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-26 Thread Charles Marcus
On 4/26/2007 Eyvind Bernhardsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I don't disagree, but it's the least broken imap client that I know of for the Mac, and I've learned to live with most of its quirks by now. Less broken than Thunderbird? Thunderbirds IMAP support - at least on windows - seems to me

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-26 Thread Charles Marcus
Mulberry rocks! Best email client I know of. Reminds me of how good Eudora was when it first came out. eh, sorry, gnus (on emacs) is probably the best. but it's too difficult for most users. You're arguing with yourself? ;) I tried Mulberry after hearing about it here - and was very

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-26 Thread Kenny Dail
On 25. apr. 2007, at 20.06, Robert Schetterer wrote: Hi, as i have one customer on courier only with apple mail i got known of so many bugs with imap that i must say this is a broken client in my eyes I don't disagree, but it's the least broken imap client that I know of for the

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-26 Thread Jon Callas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm using Apple Mail to Dovecot and have no real issues with IMAP to Dovecot. Certainly not as many as others. I'm also doing IMAP to Exchange and to Communigate Pro, and Exchange sucks royally, but Dovecot and CGP work fine. At work, we do

[Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-25 Thread Eyvind Bernhardsen
The LSUB command does not act like LIST when provided with an empty mask argument. LIST responds with the hierarchy delimiter: * LIST (\Noselect) . OK List completed. whereas LSUB doesn't return anything useful: OK Lsub completed. RFC 3501 doesn't specify what LSUB

Re: [Dovecot] LSUB vs LIST (hacked Apple Mail problem)

2007-04-25 Thread Robert Schetterer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eyvind Bernhardsen schrieb: The LSUB command does not act like LIST when provided with an empty mask argument. LIST responds with the hierarchy delimiter: * LIST (\Noselect) . OK List completed. whereas LSUB doesn't return anything