Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-25 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 24 Jan 2008, Bill Cole wrote: At 5:14 PM + 1/24/08, Anne Wilson imposed structure on a stream of electrons, yielding: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns # /etc/dovecot.conf login_dir:

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-25 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:12:20PM +, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:00:23 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:47 +, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting

[Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Anne Wilson
I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns # /etc/dovecot.conf login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns Can you try upgrading to a more recent Dovecot? 1.0.10 is the current stable release. -- Asheesh. -- Why does New Jersey have more

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns Can you try upgrading to a more recent Dovecot? 1.0.10 is the current

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:47 +, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns Can you try

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Silva
on 1/24/2008 10:47 AM Anne Wilson spake the following: On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns Can you try upgrading

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:00:23 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:47 +, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Silva
on 1/24/2008 11:12 AM Anne Wilson spake the following: On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:00:23 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:47 +, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:23:49 Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: I'm setting up a

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:55:33 Scott Silva wrote: You can either leave the repo disabled and only enable it for certain packages yum --enablerepo=atrpms-testing update dovecot Or just download the rpm from the website and rpm -Uvh Yes, either is possible. I'm too tired to make a

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Bill Cole
At 5:14 PM + 1/24/08, Anne Wilson imposed structure on a stream of electrons, yielding: I'm setting up a replacement mail server on a CentOS 5.1 box. The dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. 'dovecot -n' returns # /etc/dovecot.conf login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default):

Re: [Dovecot] New server error

2008-01-24 Thread Angel Marin
Anne Wilson escribió: On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:55:33 Scott Silva wrote: You can either leave the repo disabled and only enable it for certain packages yum --enablerepo=atrpms-testing update dovecot Or just download the rpm from the website and rpm -Uvh Yes, either is possible. I'm too