Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

2007-06-26 Thread Adam McDougall
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:50:01AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 22:26 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:28:56AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The \Seen flag is stored privately

Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

2007-06-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:53 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: On 6/3/2007 Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The \Seen flag is stored privately if you have created dovecot-shared file to the maildir. There isn't yet support for

Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

2007-06-05 Thread Charles Marcus
I have a real need to have (at least) one shared folder (inbound faxes) with shared \Seen flags - so the 5 people assigned to monitor it will know when someone else has seen/forwarded a new fax - and private \Seen flags on other shared maildirs (like distribution lists, etc)... Are you saying

Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

2007-06-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 22:26 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:28:56AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The \Seen flag is stored privately if you have created dovecot-shared file to the maildir. Is it

[Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

2007-05-23 Thread Marc Delling
hi! i would appreciate to have some comments on my below scenario: # from the config userdb static { args = uid=vmail gid=mail home=/vmail/%d/%n } namespace public { separator = / prefix = All/ location = maildir:/vmail/%d/all/Maildir:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/