Hi Timo,
Actually virtual Dovecot quota completely ignores shared/public
namespaces currently. The only reason why you seem to notice a "combined
quota" is most likely because of filesystem quota limit exceeding.
Or the local quota was exceeded too, so the mail was deferred anyway.
So I sup
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:33 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yes, that looked like an easy thing to implement. Added to v1.2:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/16c286aee307
Actually a couple of more commits after that were also needed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 02:39 +0200, Anton Dollmaier wrote:
> As my tests have shown, dovecot uses a different approach to the
> quota-issue: users can always move their mails from local folders to the
> shared namespace, regardless of the shared quota. The quota itself is
> only checked when rece
Good morning list,
first of all: dovecot works really great, the performance is
overwhelming (especially compared to courier), the configuration
flexible as hell, it is good documented - I love this software.
But as things get complicated, I think I need some additional help.
I'm using do