On S 13 Dec, 2008, at 14:56 , Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
you put in so many negatives there that the
* Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la route add etc?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de)
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la route add
etc?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
Understood. I sorta like this idea. I will give
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
Hoards of little prepubescent miscreants won't stop hammering on my
pop3 port and it's driving me bananas.
Although I'm not necessarily arguing against such a feature being
integrated directly into dovecot, you can fix you're problem
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
Hello Dovecot developers,
Apple has made and tested significant changes to Dovecot v1.1 and now
is ready to contribute them back to your open source project. The
changes include:
Scalability and performance:
allow pop/imap mail processes to handle multiple clients
larger listen queues
Very cool to see Apple contribute to dovecot!
Cor
three cheers to see apple working on this.
hopefully we will see it on 10.6 os x server
looking forward to it.
if there is any tutorial on installing it in conjunction 10.5 server
it would be greatly appreciated.
rashantha de silva
On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Hello
amazing. we just finished hacking apple-user-mailattribute into our
dovecot ldap conf last month. do you have any sample confs posted?
our OD usage atm is very crude...
JL
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
Hello Dovecot developers,
Apple has made and tested significant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave McGuire said the following on 13/12/08 06:41:
Timo, if I may make a request...Unless 1.2 will be released soon,
would you please also look into the possibility of integrating the back
off after failed auth attempts feature into the 1.1 code
On Dec 13, 2008, at 12:43 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Timo, if I may make a request...Unless 1.2 will be released soon,
would you please also look into the possibility of integrating the
back
off after failed auth attempts feature into the 1.1 code base? I
need
that badly here, to the point
* Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com:
Thank you for the suggestion, but no, that doesn't work for me. I'm not
running a Linux box, I'm running Solaris...
It runs on Solaris.
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the
16 matches
Mail list logo
