Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-24 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 24 May 2007, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote: By the was, I don't understand why a thunderbird plugin would not be able to do ssh :) It might, but the server doesn't. Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but prefer

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Adi Kriegisch
Hi! Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For Sounds like a job for ACAP. It's rumoured to be the most complex Internet Engineering Task Force designed protocol ever... --

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Kaz
Adi Kriegisch wrote: [snip] Dovecot is an excellent piece of software. It is fast, compatible, has an enourmous amount of configuration possibilities and just works. I very well understand that software like this is rare -- but by demanding extensions that have nothing to do with what that

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote: As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use CalDAV -- a webdav extension designed for exactly that purpose. There is an excellent implementation available at: http://rscds.sourceforge.net/ (also Apple has released

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
On 5/24/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote: As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use CalDAV -- a webdav extension designed for exactly that purpose. There is an excellent implementation available at:

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-24 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:33 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote: It might, but the server doesn't. Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but prefer locking them down, e.g. with Webinterfaces or IMAP. Also, Dovecot has other ways of authentification, e.g. Virtual Users.

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-24 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
On 5/24/07, Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:33 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote: It might, but the server doesn't. Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but prefer locking them down, e.g. with Webinterfaces or IMAP. Also, Dovecot has

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Marc Perkel
Robert Schetterer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Cusack schrieb: On May 23, 2007 12:33:04 PM -0700 David Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Cusack wrote: On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: Keep in mind that one of the reasons people buy Exchange is because Exchange does things that people want. A calendar is one of many examples. But to start with I'm thinking more in terms of controlling server side email settings.

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-24 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Steffen Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 24 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote: You need to start distinguishing between SSH the protocol and SSH the shell implementation, afaict the protocol should allow any use like this without ever granting access to a shell, like sftp-server etc.

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature = calender ?

2007-05-24 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes - with the ability to ise IMAP as a connection channel you could do anything that Microsoft Exchange does and more. The idea is that you can establish a connection between any server app and any client app. Yes, this is correct, and what some people

[Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Marc Perkel
10 days ago I proposed this addition (see below) to Dovecot and got a lot of positive response. I would like to make it happen. I'm willing to contribute $500 to the development of this feature. It doesn't have to be implemented perfectly but needs to be workable to the extent that I can

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
why not use ssh for that purpose ? On 5/23/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 10 days ago I proposed this addition (see below) to Dovecot and got a lot of positive response. I would like to make it happen. I'm willing to contribute $500 to the development of this feature. It doesn't have

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Rick Romero
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:11 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote: why not use ssh for that purpose ? You wouldn't necessarily want all your users to ssh into your mail server, or deal with the configuration of that. Doing it through dovecot means it's already locked down to some point. I wonder if I

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Frank Cusack
On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For example,

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread funkypunky drunky
Yeah it is a great idea. For example with a good plugin which is used in a Webmail environment. Individual clients may submit spam mails to the email server with these imap extension and it will create self control against with the users of email server. 2007/5/23, Frank Cusack [EMAIL

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Christian Schmidt
Marc Perkel, 23.05.2007 (d.m.y): IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For example, personalized server settings. Suppose

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Marc Perkel
funkypunky drunky wrote: Yeah it is a great idea. For example with a good plugin which is used in a Webmail environment. Individual clients may submit spam mails to the email server with these imap extension and it will create self control against with the users of email server. Yep -

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread David Jonas
Frank Cusack wrote: On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
On 5/23/07, Rick Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:11 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote: why not use ssh for that purpose ? You wouldn't necessarily want all your users to ssh into your mail server, or deal with the configuration of that. And what about a chrooted environment

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
On 5/23/07, David Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Cusack wrote: On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins talk

Re: [Dovecot] Will pay $500 towards a Dovecot feature

2007-05-23 Thread Frank Cusack
On May 23, 2007 12:33:04 PM -0700 David Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Cusack wrote: On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom