Ah, the Pascal... even better... :)
Pascal Volk wrote:
>On 01/03/2014 08:58 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2014-01-03 3:54 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> IIRC doveconf -n shows NON-DEFAULT settings :)
>>
>> This I know, but doveconf -n was inspired by postfix's postconf -n
>> feature, and with
On 01/03/2014 08:58 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2014-01-03 3:54 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> IIRC doveconf -n shows NON-DEFAULT settings :)
>
> This I know, but doveconf -n was inspired by postfix's postconf -n
> feature, and with postfix, if I explicitly set something that is set
> the same
Larry Rosenman skrev den 2014-01-03 21:54:
IIRC doveconf -n shows NON-DEFAULT settings :)
dovecot is not postfix, checking settings in c code ?, eg doing "strings
dovecot-lda" ?
where is the default settings ?
On 2014-01-03 3:54 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
IIRC doveconf -n shows NON-DEFAULT settings :)
This I know, but doveconf -n was inspired by postfix's postconf -n
feature, and with postfix, if I explicitly set something that is set
the same way by default, it still shows up in -n output.
It m
IIRC doveconf -n shows NON-DEFAULT settings :)
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I have it set, but it doesn't show up.
>
> However, I noticed that it does show as enabled by default in doveconf -a
> output.
>
> Is this why it doesn't show up in doveconf -n output?
>
> --
>
I have it set, but it doesn't show up.
However, I noticed that it does show as enabled by default in doveconf
-a output.
Is this why it doesn't show up in doveconf -n output?
--
Best regards,
Charles
