on 8-12-2008 7:26 AM CJ Keist spake the following:
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most
I am using this simple sieve script to do vacation:
require [fileinto, vacation];
if exists X-Spam-Flag {
stop;
}
vacation
:days 1
:subject Out of office reply
:addresses [email address hidden, email address hidden ]
I am on vacation until 2008-08-07.
If you have something urgent, please
Am 12.08.2008 13:32 schrieb Josef Liška:
…
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in my
opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in spam
filters.
I think there could be same sender on envelope.
In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c around
Josef Liška schreef:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in
spam filters.
I think there could be same sender on envelope.
In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c around line 380 is a call to
On 8/12/2008, Josef Liaka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable,
It is not only desirable, as Stephan already pointed out to someone
else, it is per the spec:
This behavior is implemented as such on purpose.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:26:28AM -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I understand the concept of having the from empty, namely to keep
It's not just a concept but a rule set by some RFCs.
another automated system from replying back to your vacation reply, but
what do we do to keep our vacation
