Hi,
I´m reading the past topics related to archive and scalability of dovecot,
they are all very interesting. Here, I´m using two dovecot proxies in
front of five storages pairs, and we split the domain´s accounts among
those servers. So, we can share the i/o load and if one server goes down
only
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:00 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
this is very weird and (at same time) very interesting approach. Instead
of put all messages into one maildir and this maildir into one server,
this maildir (?) is spplited among many servers - so, if one servers
fails the account
Hi Timo,
Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
implement a filesystem that allows distributing a single user's mails to
multiple servers ...'.
My idea is just in the direction that we don´t need to care about
filesystem, we don´t need any distribuited filesystem...let
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
Hi Timo,
Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
implement a filesystem that allows distributing a single user's mails to
multiple servers ...'.
My idea is just in the direction that we don´t need to
I´m not sure if i´m being quite clear about my solution (pardon my
english)...
I´m not thinking in any filesystem abstraction layer, I´m afraid of this
kind of solution. If some corruption happens we can loose data - and the
crash-recovery is not easy.
I´m suggesting the opposite, to not have an
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:41 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
I´m suggesting the opposite, to not have an abstraction layer. The
abstraction layer would be the proxy - dovecot does the abstraction layer.
When I´m telling 'proxy' I meaning something like the proxy feature of the
dovecot.
ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
I´m reading the past topics related to archive and scalability of dovecot,
they are all very interesting. Here, I´m using two dovecot proxies in
front of five storages pairs, and we split the domain´s accounts among
those servers. So, we can share the i/o load and if
Hi Timo,
Do you have any experience using Dovecot and Glusterfs ? How about the
maturity of Glusterfs in a huge email environment ?
Fernando
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
Hi Timo,
Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:13 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
Hi Timo,
Do you have any experience using Dovecot and Glusterfs ?
Not really.
How about the
maturity of Glusterfs in a huge email environment ?
No idea.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
