On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 17:54 +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello Timo!
>
> What was exactly wrong in v1.0.8 and v1.0.9 with mbox handling?
v1.0.8 added optimizations to get message's full size without reading
through the entire message. This helped performance a lot with large
messages, especi
Hello Timo!
What was exactly wrong in v1.0.8 and v1.0.9 with mbox handling?
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.0.8 and v1.0.9
On 29.12.2007, at 13.40, Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
Timo: is dovecot-sieve-1.0.2 still the latest and good-to-go with
v1.0.10?
Yes.
On Dec 29, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
Timo: is dovecot-sieve-1.0.2 still the latest and good-to-go with
v1.0.10?
Thank you very much.
B. Bodger
New York
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.0.8 and v1.0.9 were a bit bad releases. Hopefully one day I've
managed to have written a proper test suite which can be run before
doing any releases..
* Security hole with L
