Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-19 Thread Werner
Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen: On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders were marked as unread. This is a Thunderbird bug and

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-19 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 19.2.2010, at 17.28, Werner wrote: Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen: On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders were marked as

[Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in /home/%user/mail/.imap. Performed upgrade to 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Modified

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders were marked as unread. This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about this

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Nikolay Shopik
On 15.02.2010 17:14, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in /home/%user/mail/.imap.

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues
Em 15/02/2010 12:14, Stan Hoeppner escreveu: WTF is going on? Why won't they stay marked as read? I've got over 25,000 emails in these folders and I get a few hundred list mails a day. I really need to get this read/unread business straightened out. What the heck am I missing? Is this a

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread ronald
Stan, Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 8:18 AM: On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders were marked as unread. This is a Thunderbird bug

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.2.2010, at 16.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote: This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about this here. Basically the fix is to disable CONDSTORE support in Thunderbird until 3.0.2 is released. I guess I should have paid closer attention to that thread. Since I wasn't

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 8:58 AM: On 15.2.2010, at 16.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote: This is a Thunderbird bug and there have been several threads about this here. Basically the fix is to disable CONDSTORE support in Thunderbird until 3.0.2 is released. I guess I should have paid

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote: One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it specific to mbox? I looked at the patch, and it looked like the code that handled condstore was simply just

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.2.2010, at 17.23, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote: One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it specific to mbox? Oh, and: In general, IMAP clients aren't

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 9:26 AM: On 15.2.2010, at 17.23, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 15.2.2010, at 17.15, Stan Hoeppner wrote: One last question on this TB condstore bug: Does this affect both mbox and maildir, i.e. it's a pure IMAP protocol handling bug, or is it specific to

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.2.2010, at 17.52, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Speaking of which, I've tried creating empty imap folders and then creating subfolders in them. TB won't allow me to do this with Dovecot mbox accounts. Shouldn't I be able to do this? I've tried it with and without tb-extra-mailbox-sep enabled.

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
Well, the issue is, with mbox, you can decide if the name you create: a) can hold child mailboxes, or messages or b) messages, and no mailboxes it makes more sense when you think about them as directories and files. WIth mbox a mailbox is a file. So: ~/mailbox/inbox ~/mailbox/foo/

Re: [Dovecot] wish now I'd not upgraded...

2010-02-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/15/2010 11:19 AM: Well, the issue is, with mbox, you can decide if the name you create: a) can hold child mailboxes, or messages or b) messages, and no mailboxes it makes more sense when you think about them as directories and files. WIth mbox a mailbox