ses that
> DIRNAME respectively FULLDIRNAME could be empty (and works properly)?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Hativ
>
>
> Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
> Datum:Sun, 8 Jul 2018 15:40:46 +0200
> Von: Hati
Would it be possible to add the possibility in future releases that
DIRNAME respectively FULLDIRNAME could be empty (and works properly)?
Greetings,
Hativ
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Re: Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Datum: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 15:4
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot oy
Original message
From: Hativ
Date: 07/07/2018 20:53 (GMT+02:00)
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Hey again,
sorry, but I have to correct me: Even with dot it's not working
completely. The subscriptions file is not cre
Does it work better if you use
mail_location=sdbox:~/sdbox:DIRNAME=
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Hativ Date:
07/07/2018 20:53 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: Get rid of
the "dbox-Mails"-folder
Hey again,
so
as it's needed for that.
Greetings,
Hativ
Am 06.07.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Hativ:
Hey to all,
is it possible to get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder when using sdbox?
Currently my folder structure looks like this (I hope the output from
tree would be formatted well):
/srv/mail/
└── e
to check the source code, but I don't know C as good as
it's needed for that.
Greetings,
Hativ
Am 06.07.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Hativ:
Hey to all,
is it possible to get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder when using sdbox?
Currently my folder structure looks like this (I hope the output
Hey to all,
is it possible to get rid of the "dbox-Mails"-folder when using sdbox?
Currently my folder structure looks like this (I hope the output from
tree would be formatted well):
/srv/mail/
└── example.com
└── user
├── dovecot-acl-list
├── dovecot-