Right ive turned off my local Thunderbird sig, hopefully this now works.
I did several tests against my hotmail/gmail accounts and also other accounts in the office instead of sending to the
mailing list and all were received ok, it seems to only go wrong though the maillist.
Charles Marcus wr
<>
Am 08.06.2011 16:26, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2011-06-08 10:18 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 08.06.2011 15:16, schrieb Ricardo Branco:
>>
>> well i am only seeing your
>> wenn_logo_plus_offices.gif in thunderbird
>> no text at all, for your body text i had to choose header view
>
> I don'
On 2011-06-08 10:18 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 08.06.2011 15:16, schrieb Ricardo Branco:
>
> well i am only seeing your
> wenn_logo_plus_offices.gif in thunderbird
> no text at all, for your body text i had to choose header view
I don't see any body text anywhere, headers or the body, all
Am 08.06.2011 15:16, schrieb Ricardo Branco:
well i am only seeing your
wenn_logo_plus_offices.gif in thunderbird
no text at all, for your body text i had to choose header view
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
<>
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:23 +0100, Ricardo Branco wrote:
Well, this was an interesting message. multipart/alternative where first
part was text and second part a GIF image. My email client decided that
it preferred showing the GIF image to text (which was its right, as it
was an alternative).
> U
<>
I answered this some hours ago. If you don't read all mails to mailing list,
don't set the Reply-To: header to mailing list.
On 8.6.2011, at 0.54, Ricardo Branco wrote:
> anyone seen this issue, its still plaguing us and also seems to have a knock
> on affect as our blackberries are seeing mess
anyone seen this issue, its still plaguing us and also seems to have a
knock on affect as our blackberries are seeing messages late
On 24/05/2011 10:44, Ricardo Branco wrote:
Dovecot 2.0.13
Centos 5.4 x86_64 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (on ESXi)
OS/Logs on local storage, /home all on NFS server for data
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:44 +0100, Ricardo Branco wrote:
> Dovecot 2.0.13
> Centos 5.4 x86_64 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (on ESXi)
> OS/Logs on local storage, /home all on NFS server for datastore (NFS Store
> Centos 5.5 x86_64 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5)
> Thunderbird 3.1.10 on XP/W7 Desktops
>
> We are seeing
On 21.5.2011, at 2.31, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> Is there any way I can see in the logs if IMAP COMPRESS is used?
Not currently. Would be nice in the logout message I guess.
But it seem like the feature is not announced when connecting to the IMAP
server:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS LOGINDISABLED AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready.
Log in first.
Thank you Timo, I see it is listed after login.
Th
On 21.5.2011, at 2.10, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> But it seem like the feature is not announced when connecting to the IMAP
> server:
> * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
> STARTTLS LOGINDISABLED AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready.
Log in first.
>
On 2011-05-17 10:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17.5.2011, at 13.55, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
>> One last thing, you asked previously if I used NFS and I said that
>> in this case I wasn't. We do have NFS and we do want to use it under some
>> circumstances with Dovecot, both server and client a
On 17.5.2011, at 13.55, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> One last thing, you asked previously if I used NFS and I said that in this
> case I wasn't. We do have NFS and we do want to use it under some
> circumstances with Dovecot, both server and client are FreeBSD 8.2, are there
> any known issues w
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
You could try saving a backup of dovecot-uidlist periodically and when
this happens again, see what exactly changed in the file.
Well actually I have hourly/weekly/monthly ZFS snapshots of all data
so I can do this now. Here I can see that the UID changed between wee
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:31 +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
>
> >
> > Try grepping for "Warning" also. I usually put error logs to a different
> > file. That file should stay empty (except for Dovecot stop messages).
>
> Hi, I don't have a dovecot log specified in the c
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
Try grepping for "Warning" also. I usually put error logs to a different
file. That file should stay empty (except for Dovecot stop messages).
Hi, I don't have a dovecot log specified in the config, so I believe
everything goes to syslog which I think all ends up in
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:41 +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
> > Have you checked if there are any errors in Dovecot logs? There are some
> > reasons why Dovecot might give a new UID to an existing mail. dovecot -n
> > output might also be useful.
> >
>thanks for the r
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
Have you checked if there are any errors in Dovecot logs? There are some
reasons why Dovecot might give a new UID to an existing mail. dovecot -n
output might also be useful.
Hi Timo,
thanks for the reply. I just checked and the file names are correct
for the mail
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:35 +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting a.sm...@ukgrid.net:
>
> >
> > Ok, I just deleted the dovecot index files etc from the mailbox,
> > when it recreated them all is now looking normal...
> >
>
> When I logged into my mail today this problem has come back :S Ca
Quoting a.sm...@ukgrid.net:
Ok, I just deleted the dovecot index files etc from the mailbox,
when it recreated them all is now looking normal...
When I logged into my mail today this problem has come back :S Can
anyone suggest a cause or anything else I should do?
I am correct in think
Quoting a.sm...@ukgrid.net:
Hi,
I just noticed that the ordering by message ID when accessing my
email via IMAP is messed up. I'm looking in the INBOX that contains
11757 emails. For some reason a load of emails from 2009 and 2010
are being listed near the top, for example I have a mess
Am 06.05.2011 17:02, schrieb Dennis Guhl:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:57:23PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
> [..]
>
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> Im running dovecot v2 and want to know if it supports IMAP push
> capabilities.
>
> [..]
>
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:57:23PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
[..]
> >> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> >>> Im running dovecot v2 and want to know if it supports IMAP push
> >>> capabilities.
[..]
> imap push means something like imap lemonade
No, th
Am 06.05.2011 13:11, schrieb Marc Patermann:
> Hi,
>
> Dennis Guhl schrieb am 05.05.2011 12:58 Uhr:
>> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
>>> Im running dovecot v2 and want to know if it supports IMAP push
>>> capabilities.
>>
>> Dovecot supports IMAP IDLE as in R
Hi,
Dennis Guhl schrieb am 05.05.2011 12:58 Uhr:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
Im running dovecot v2 and want to know if it supports IMAP push capabilities.
Dovecot supports IMAP IDLE as in RFC 2177
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2177).
I have a few cl
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> Dear all,
> Im running dovecot v2 and want to know if it supports IMAP push capabilities.
Dovecot supports IMAP IDLE as in RFC 2177
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2177).
> I have a few client who has blackberries, iphones and
On 04/28/2011 10:31 AM, Matt wrote:
Does IMAP create much additional system load vs. POP3?
How much is much?
They do have different usage patterns. The server load also depends on
how each client program is configured. Some client configurations create
more of a load than others (eg how mes
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 19:54 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011 19:31:49 Matt wrote:
> > Does IMAP create much additional system load vs. POP3?
>
If you do use IMAP, server disk space capacity can become an important
number to watch as most POP3 clients by default will del
Quoting Jim Pazarena :
On 2011-04-28 10:31 AM, Matt wrote:
Does IMAP create much additional system load vs. POP3?
I would say it adds considerable load to the server.
I would argue the opposite. POP3 creates more load, especially on the
network side of things, since it requires the clien
On 2011-04-28 10:31 AM, Matt wrote:
Does IMAP create much additional system load vs. POP3?
I would say it adds considerable load to the server.
The beauty is that multiple computers can synchronize all mail
folders INCLUDING the Outbox/Sent folder to the common archive,
which becomes the mail s
On Thursday 28 April 2011 19:31:49 Matt wrote:
> Does IMAP create much additional system load vs. POP3?
in fact imap move the load :
in pop, all classment of mail, spam filtering... is done by your computer (the
mail client)
in imap, this filtering is done by the server
The question is : where
On 9.4.2011, at 1.01, Nick VonHollen wrote:
> When I converted the config file, I somehow set vsz_limit to 1k. The child
> process tries to load its core libraries, runs out of virtual memory, and is
> killed.
>
> We have a lot of limits set in the config file, and I've seen warnings for
>
I feel pretty dumb.
When I converted the config file, I somehow set vsz_limit to 1k. The child
process tries to load its core libraries, runs out of virtual memory, and is
killed.
We have a lot of limits set in the config file, and I've seen warnings for
other limits, but not this one.
Hop
Hi Nicholas,
I'm trying to upgrade/test our configuration files from Dovecot 1.2 to
2.0.11. I used the Dovecot config convert command, created a RHEL 5
x86_64 rpm, and tested it. I can connect, but once I login, the IMAP
service segfaults. I've also reproduced this on version 2.0.8.
Don'
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:39:35PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:25 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > My dovecot directors (v2.0.8) had 3 instances of these yesterday:
> >
> > imap-login: Panic: file ioloop.c: line 35 (io_add): assertion failed:
> > (fd >= 0)
> >
"Timo Sirainen" said:
> On 8.4.2011, at 0.17, Nicholas VonHollen wrote:
>
>> Thanks for helping me out. It looks like no matter what I do, changing the
>> executable line doesn't help. I even changed it to "executable =
>> /bin/false" and
>> it still reports a segfault. I verified the config
On 8.4.2011, at 0.17, Nicholas VonHollen wrote:
> Thanks for helping me out. It looks like no matter what I do, changing the
> executable line doesn't help. I even changed it to "executable = /bin/false"
> and it still reports a segfault. I verified the config with "dovecot -n",
> stopped us
Hi Timo,
Thanks for helping me out. It looks like no matter what I do, changing the
executable line doesn't help. I even changed it to "executable = /bin/false"
and it still reports a segfault. I verified the config with "dovecot -n",
stopped using the "-c /etc/dovecot.conf", moved the conf
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 18:53 -0400, Nicholas VonHollen wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade/test our configuration files from Dovecot 1.2 to
> 2.0.11. I used the Dovecot config convert command, created a RHEL 5
> x86_64 rpm, and tested it. I can connect, but once I login, the IMAP
> service segfaults.
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:15:59PM -0700, ShepN wrote:
> The mail that is placed my system users mailbox by postfix is not being
> transmitted to my outlook client by dovecot.
My first thought was that dovecot was not looking in the place
where postfix put the mail, but that seems not to be it.
on 4/1/2011 8:15 PM ShepN spake the following:
>
> - Postfix is doing its job sending and receiving email. It puts the email
> in the unix user mailboxes (MBOX).
> - My Outlook client is authenticating with DoveCot using IMAP protocol
> without issue.
>
> The Problem:
>
> The mail that is pla
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:25 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> My dovecot directors (v2.0.8) had 3 instances of these yesterday:
>
> imap-login: Panic: file ioloop.c: line 35 (io_add): assertion failed:
> (fd >= 0)
> master: Error: service(imap-login): child 17374 killed with signal
On 26.3.2011, at 23.56, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>> Little chance at the moment. It's not easy. It's actually very difficult. I
>> would want to create "doveadm move" command, but I think I'll just make that
>> to be a copy+expunge as well.
doveadm move command is in hg.
> Forgot to ask, will be
On 12.03.2011 2:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 11.3.2011, at 23.25, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Any chance we could get IMAP move extension support in Dovecot?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krecicki-imap-move-01
Little chance at the moment. It's not easy. It's actually very difficult. I would want
On 11.3.2011, at 23.25, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Any chance we could get IMAP move extension support in Dovecot?
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krecicki-imap-move-01
Little chance at the moment. It's not easy. It's actually very difficult. I
would want to create "doveadm move" command, but I
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 09:50 +0100, J4K wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
>
> I noticed some mobile client connections that I know should have
> timed out at least 20 mins ago, yet these are still there. The device
> in question lost its 3G connection and never re-established it. I know,
> beca
On 09/02/2011 23:04, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It is possible to convert from MBOX to MDBOX in one shot ?
You can run dsync one user at a time, and of course you can run it for
as many users as you want. I'd suggest switching a few users first to
make sure everything will work nicely.
Just to highl
Sorry guys
Ignore my preceding post ... dsync worked well
not enough coffee this morning ...
On 02/10/2011 12:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 07:12 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
We actually use MBOX format on our mailhub but this
does not permit to create IMAP subfolders.
It does, although it's less obvious how to do that with most clients.
My problem is to choose the
On 02/10/2011 12:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 07:12 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
We actually use MBOX format on our mailhub but this
does not permit to create IMAP subfolders.
It does, although it's less obvious how to do that with most clients.
My problem is to choose the
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 07:12 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> We actually use MBOX format on our mailhub but this
> does not permit to create IMAP subfolders.
It does, although it's less obvious how to do that with most clients.
> My problem is to choose the format that will permit
> imap subfolders
Then you can have userdb set namespace/default/separator=/,
namespace/others/separator=/ and namespace/pub/separator=/. Or a
post-login script to set those in environment.
Thanks, this seems to work fine. In the interests of providing closure
(for somebody trawling through mailing list archi
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:22 -0500, Jason Liedtke wrote:
> This morning I have a Outlook 2007 user who getting the error and I am
> unsure how to fix it.
>
> Cannot open this item. The server responded: "Error in IMAP command UID
> FETCH: Invalid uidset'
Looks like Outlook is sending some garbage
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Jerrale G
wrote:
> On 1/17/2011 6:42 AM, Pascal Volk wrote:
>>
>> On 01/17/2011 12:35 PM Antonio Manogué wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I'm running dovecot 1.0.rc7 in a RHEL.
>>>
>>> I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
>>> project.
>>
On 1/17/2011 6:42 AM, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/17/2011 12:35 PM Antonio Manogué wrote:
Hi.
I'm running dovecot 1.0.rc7 in a RHEL.
I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
project.
Why using an old Dovecot version for a new project?
Two times yes to answer your q
On 2011-01-17 7:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-01-17 6:42 AM, Antonio Manogué wrote:
>> I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
>> project.
>
> What you really need to 'know' is that 1.0.7 is extremely old,
And I just noticed this was not even 1.0.7, but 1.0
On 2011-01-17 6:42 AM, Antonio Manogué wrote:
> I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
> project.
What you really need to 'know' is that 1.0.7 is extremely old, and you
need to update, *especially* if you are starting a new project.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 01/17/2011 12:35 PM Antonio Manogué wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm running dovecot 1.0.rc7 in a RHEL.
>
> I need to know if this version supports IMAPV4 rev1 and IDLE for a new
> project.
Why using an old Dovecot version for a new project?
Two times yes to answer your questions. See also:
http://wik
On 1/7/2011 9:58 AM, William Blunn wrote:
On 07/12/2010 15:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
However, when the account is viewed in Windows Thunderbird 3.1.6 or
Outlook 2010 the 3rd tier dirs are not seen, nor can they be
subscribed to. On a whim, I decided to try Apple Mail 4.3 to view the
account a
On 07/12/2010 15:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migrator to move mail from Exchange 2007 to
my Dovecot 1.0.7 server. The program seem
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 19:54 +, ian+dove...@comtek.co.uk wrote:
> Has anybody got any tips on migrating IMAP separators? Ideally I'd be
> able to migrate users incrementally. Is there a way to specify the
> separator per-user? I can't see a way to do it with a postlogin script
> or userdb.
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 17:38 -0500, void...@transientvoid.com wrote:
> > I have maildir folders to which mail is delivered using procmail recipes
> > directly to the appropriate dovecot folder. In these folders, I notice
> > that the "cur" directory has a matching number of messages that do not
>
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 17:38 -0500, void...@transientvoid.com wrote:
> I have maildir folders to which mail is delivered using procmail recipes
> directly to the appropriate dovecot folder. In these folders, I notice that
> the "cur" directory has a matching number of messages that do not have an
On 9.12.2010, at 23.41, Ernesto Revilla Derksen wrote:
> Yes, we would be very interested in that libstorage thing. Our initial
> backends are Dovecot, Alfresco and an issue tracker, like Redmine. The
> issue tracker has actually NO IMAP interface. But perhaps we could
> offer a libstorage provide
Hi again.
Pls, see below.
2010/11/26 Timo Sirainen :
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 00:43 +0100, Ernesto Revilla Derksen wrote:
>
>> Is IMAP aggregation proxying really so difficult? I know about the
>> problems of COPY (which in some cases in Cyrus-Murder is handled by
>> the proxy itself), but don't
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:00 -0500, qm...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> (gdb) x 0x80ff950
> 0x80ff950 :0x53e58955
>
> Is it a problem with the ACL plugin ?
Can you reproduce it? It's not dangerous, but it looks like some deinit
function isn't being called. I looked at the code, but couldn't
Thank you Greg for pointing out the TB bug. The TB bug is indeed the
problem. (And well Outlook is just a terrible IMAP client..., so I won't
comment more on that!) We discovered the problem on our own by manually
adding all folders to the subscription file on the server. If you add
all the ne
On 7.12.2010, at 20.42, Mike Korizek wrote:
>>> I use dovecot as imap/pop proxy.
>>> Is it possible to filter the messages before they get delivered to the
>>> client?
>>
>> For now if you wanted to do something like this, you'd need to figure out
>> something more complex.
>
> What do you mean
On 12/07/2010 12:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6.12.2010, at 23.04, Mike Korizek wrote:
>
>> I use dovecot as imap/pop proxy.
>> Is it possible to filter the messages before they get delivered to the
>> client?
>
> For now if you wanted to do something like this, you'd need to figure out
>
On 2010-12-07 8:17 AM, dovecot wrote:
> On 07-12-10 17:12, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
>>
>> On 12/7/2010 11:02 AM, dovecot wrote:
>>> On 07-12-10 16:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, o
On 07-12-10 17:12, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
On 12/7/2010 11:02 AM, dovecot wrote:
On 07-12-10 16:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migr
On 12/7/2010 11:02 AM, dovecot wrote:
On 07-12-10 16:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migrator to move mail from Exchange 2007 to
my Do
On 07-12-10 16:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migrator to move mail from Exchange 2007 to
my Dovecot 1.0.7 server. The program seems
On 12/07/2010 12:18 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 06:04 PM, Mike Korizek wrote:
>> I use dovecot as imap/pop proxy.
>> Is it possible to filter the messages before they get delivered to the
>> client?
>>
>
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve
My understanding was, that Sieve require
On 6.12.2010, at 23.04, Mike Korizek wrote:
> I use dovecot as imap/pop proxy.
> Is it possible to filter the messages before they get delivered to the
> client?
Dovecot's proxying is really dummy. I've some plans in v2.1 to make smarter
proxying possible, but it's going to take a while. For now
* Spyros Tsiolis :
> Hello,
>
> Finally managed to sync an outlook client to dovecot.
> Looks like it's working.
> Questions though ; :
>
> What are the limits? Number of Folders ?
> Number of mails per folder ?
Are there any? Maybe a 32bit limit for number of mails per folder and
such? But then
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 00:43 +0100, Ernesto Revilla Derksen wrote:
> Is IMAP aggregation proxying really so difficult? I know about the
> problems of COPY (which in some cases in Cyrus-Murder is handled by
> the proxy itself), but don't know if there are any other gotchas.
Are you thinking about
Hi.
2010/11/24 Clemens Schrimpe :
>> I'm planning on implementing "IMAP client" backend for lib-storage, which
>> means you could create namespaces that are proxied to remote IMAP server. Or
>> even make Dovecot act as a caching IMAP proxy for your real IMAP server.
>
> Yes, yes --- Y, p
> I'm planning on implementing "IMAP client" backend for lib-storage, which
> means you could create namespaces that are proxied to remote IMAP server. Or
> even make Dovecot act as a caching IMAP proxy for your real IMAP server.
Yes, yes --- Y, please!!! :-)
Clemens
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'm planning on implementing "IMAP client" backend for lib-storage, which means
you could create namespaces that are proxied to remote IMAP server. Or even make Dovecot
act as a caching IMAP proxy for your real IMAP server.
This would allow for some amazing setups.
(Second time already within a few days when I accidentally hit reply rather
than reply-to-all and then wonder why the message isn't showing up.)
On 24.11.2010, at 14.16, Ernesto Revilla Derksen wrote:
> We're trying to find a solutions for aggregating data from several
> backends which are:
> *
Thanx Timo.
We're trying to find a solutions for aggregating data from several
backends which are:
* normal mail IMAP
* repositories like Alfresco which offer an IMAP view for repository documents
* issue trackers (issue + attachmentes + timeline)
Credentials would be the same for all backends
On 16.11.2010, at 11.20, Ernesto Revilla Derksen wrote:
> http://www.cyrusimap.org/mediawiki/index.php/Cyrus_Murder_Design
>
> and found it very interesting.
>
> Anyone did something similar based on:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3656
I remember there used to be a guy who was planning on imp
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 31.10.2010, at 16.40, Ingo Thierack wrote:
>>
>>> is it somehow possible to use sa-learn on sdbox-mailboxes?
>>
>> Use doveadm fetch to extract the
>> mails. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Search has example how
>> to go through all m
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 31.10.2010, at 16.40, Ingo Thierack wrote:
>
>> is it somehow possible to use sa-learn on sdbox-mailboxes?
>
> Use doveadm fetch to extract the
> mails. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Search has example how
> to go through all messages in a mailbox.
Another alter
On 27.10.2010, at 22.25, Mike Abbott wrote:
> With service imap { client_limit = 5, service_count = 0 },
This still isn't all that recommended, since one connection can hang other
connections in same process.
> when the auth process crashes
Which of course shouldn't happen :)
> the existing i
On 19.10.2010, at 9.01, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
> Umm, and ¿Is it possible to log FETCH actions without modifying the code?
>
> Mail logger plugin can't let me set FETCH as event to log.
>
> Then I could count the number of header/body retrieved.
You could write a plugin, but other than tha
Umm, and ¿Is it possible to log FETCH actions without modifying the code?
Mail logger plugin can't let me set FETCH as event to log.
Then I could count the number of header/body retrieved.
2010/10/18 Timo Sirainen :
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 19:05 +0200, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
>> Courier writ
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 19:05 +0200, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
> Courier write like that:
>
> ... imapd: LOGOUT, user=luism.martinez, ip=[:::127.0.0.1],
> headers=0, body=0, rcvd=131, sent=632, time=0
>
> ¿Is there any Variables on imap_logout_format to get headers, body and
> time vars?
Wha
At first, I think the same. Maybe, I can use "mail seding" backend to catch
message but executing a generic script like "mailtrain"
I though that antispam plugin only seen the folder SPAM and you can mark
SPAM o unmark SPAM putting in or out on SPAM folder
Thanks, I will try with it.
2010/10/6 T
On 06/10/10 13:26, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are migrating a mail service with 80.000 users, and 40.000 of them are
> using IMAP.
>
> At present, this service is handled by Courier, with some custom patches.
> And we are migrating to Dovecot 1.2.15.
>
> One of these patches is
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 10:50 +0530, Sherin George wrote:
> "To alleviate this, a server may implement an inactivity timeout,
"may"
> unilaterally closing a session (after first sending an untagged BYE,
> as noted above). Some server operators have reported dramatic
> improvements in server perfor
Hi,
I could see following in RFC 2683 & RFC 2060.
"To alleviate this, a server may implement an inactivity timeout,
unilaterally closing a session (after first sending an untagged BYE,
as noted above). Some server operators have reported dramatic
improvements in server performance after doing th
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:24 +0530, Sherin George wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am also in a similar position.
>
> I have a server sitting behind hardware firewall which is configured
> to timeout all connections in 30 minutes.
>
> So, I would like to set dovecot to 30 minutes.
Dovecot never disconnect
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 9/24/2010 12:45 AM:
>
>> I have a server sitting behind hardware firewall which is configured
>> to timeout all connections in 30 minutes.
>
>
So we're having some ISP issues lately, meaning we have to reboot our
cable modem like 2-3 times a day. An unfortuna
> I have a server sitting behind hardware firewall which is configured
> to timeout all connections in 30 minutes.
>>> So we're having some ISP issues lately, meaning we have to reboot our
>>> cable modem like 2-3 times a day. An unfortunate side-effect I've
>>> found is, once the users max out
ith shorter timeouts...
>
> KT
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot-bounces+tamas.kadar=espell@dovecot.org
> [mailto:dovecot-bounces+tamas.kadar=espell@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of
> William Blunn
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:02 PM
> To: dovecot@dovec
401 - 500 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
