On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> Try adding a namespace.
>
> namespace private {
> separator = .
> prefix = INBOX.
> inbox = yes
> }
I made that change and reloaded Dovecot and all my users on the mail
server lost the folders...
Quoting "Carlos Williams" :
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Frank Elsner
wrote:
It might be useful to tell Thunderbird not only to show subscribed folders.
Edit -> Account settings -> Server settings -> Advanced, first check box.
There are some MUAs which create folders but do not add subsc
Quoting "Carlos Williams" :
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
The entire structure doesn't look correct for Maildir.
The folders you listed, puts you already in the INBOX, so your MUA should be
seeing:
INBOX\
Drafts
INBOX\
ClamAV
Dell.Quotes
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> The entire structure doesn't look correct for Maildir.
> The folders you listed, puts you already in the INBOX, so your MUA should be
> seeing:
> INBOX\
> Drafts
> INBOX\
> ClamAV
> Dell.Quotes
> Dell.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Frank Elsner
wrote:
> It might be useful to tell Thunderbird not only to show subscribed folders.
> Edit -> Account settings -> Server settings -> Advanced, first check box.
>
> There are some MUAs which create folders but do not add subscriptions
> for the folders
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:41:34 -0500 Carlos Williams wrote:
> I noticed for some reason that I am missing an IMAP folder called
> 'Symantec' that was under my Inbox. I see all my other folders listed
> on my mail client except 'Symantec'. I then login to my mail server
> which runs Postfix / Dovecot
On 24.2.2010, at 22.27, Larry Crouch wrote:
> Can Dovecot allow some users access to IMAP functionality while forcing other
> users to use POP3 only?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/RestrictAccess
On 22.1.2010, at 0.51, Federico Tomasczik wrote:
> 1) A group of users can use IMAP or POP3.
>
> 2) The others, only can use POP3. But, this users can use IMAP only
> with a webmail (the webmail is in the same server that Dovecot)
>
> It is possible? How?
If you're using SQL, you can do somethi
It's always worth searching the mailing list to see if the question's
already been asked
You don't say how you run your authentication backend. I'll hazard a
guess that you're using MySQL, in which case you should see
http://old.nabble.com/Allow-POP3-per-Domain-td27143238.html
for reference.
In y
It might be useful to add this conversation here:
On Friday 08 January 2010 22:43:27 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > On top of that, its impossible
> > to create and access a new folder with KMail on my dovecot: it
> > doesn't happen, that a new folder
On 3.1.2010, at 12.16, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> What is supposed to happen if I try to create a folder named
> "a.b" in this configuration? Since '.' is not a separator
> character anymore, and since the client doesn't know anything
> about the internals of Dovecot, I do not see why Dovecot
> compla
On January 3, 2010 6:16:18 PM +0100 Harald Dunkel
wrote:
What is supposed to happen if I try to create a folder named
"a.b" in this configuration? Since '.' is not a separator
character anymore, and since the client doesn't know anything
about the internals of Dovecot, I do not see why Dovecot
c
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 01:01 +, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> > Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Info: Disconnected: Connection queue full (auth
> > failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=,
> > lip=134.225.32.156, TLS
> > Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Panic: file ioloop.c: line 39 (io_add):
> > asse
On 18/12/2009 15:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> We have something in the
>> region of 1000 concurrent connections and login_max_processes_count *
>> login_max_connections = 128 * 256 should be enough for 32000+ of them!
>>
>> Would it be better to have login_max_connections = 1024 (or even higher)?
>
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:56 +, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> > I guess the crash is caused by the "connection queue full". I'll see about
> > fixing the crash, but you shouldn't let it get full in any case. So
> > increase your login_max_connections value.
> >
>
> That's puzzling, I thought it was
On 18/12/2009 01:11, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
>
>>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Info: Disconnected: Connection queue full (auth
>>> failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=,
>>> lip=134.225.32.156, TLS
>>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Panic: f
On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Info: Disconnected: Connection queue full (auth
>> failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=,
>> lip=134.225.32.156, TLS
>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Panic: file ioloop.c: line 39 (io_add):
>> assertion fail
On 18/12/2009 01:01, Chris Wakelin wrote:
>
> Up until this afternoon we had "login_process_per_connection = yes", and
> login_max_connections at the default (256).
I meant, of course, "login_process_per_connection = no" ...
>
> This evening I tried with "login_process_per_connection = no" wi
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen :
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> #2 0x0808cb13 in maildir_copy_hardlink (ctx=0x9fbcf98, mail=0x9fe5070)
>>> at maildir-copy.c:246
>>> src_mbox = 0x9f87e98
>>> do_ctx = {dest_path =
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > #2 0x0808cb13 in maildir_copy_hardlink (ctx=0x9fbcf98, mail=0x9fe5070)
> >at maildir-copy.c:246
> >src_mbox = 0x9f87e98
> >do_ctx = {dest_path = 0x9fecdd8,
> > dest_fname = 0xb7e68c88 ,
>
On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> #2 0x0808cb13 in maildir_copy_hardlink (ctx=0x9fbcf98, mail=0x9fe5070)
>at maildir-copy.c:246
>src_mbox = 0x9f87e98
>do_ctx = {dest_path = 0x9fecdd8,
> dest_fname = 0xb7e68c88 ,
> base_end_pos = 108, siz
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:22:58PM +0100, mich...@euroinfissi.eu wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I probably have a problem with the imap folders codepages. I use polish
> email clients such as MS Outlook and Windows Mail. The clients try to
> create folders
>
> like Wiadomości-Śmieci but Dovecot creates Wiado
Good afternoon again
I was thinking about the Dovecot upgrading so i´m doing this in the next
hours. in the other hand here i show you the dovecot-ldap.conf file I
think it has just the necessary options to bind the LDAP server.
/hosts = *
base = ou=People,o=*,o=**
ldap_versio
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:15 -0500, Juan Felipe Estrada wrote:
> /# 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
Like Andreas said, this is an old version. There have been a lot of LDAP
fixes in v1.1, so upgrading is likely to help.
> passdb:
> driver: ldap
> args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
> passdb:
> d
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 19:15:35 Juan Felipe Estrada wrote:
> Good Afternoon
>
> I´m really new at this and i don´t know if i´m posting at the right
> place.
>
> My problem is that our Dovecot IMAP is stopping from time to time
> with no info in the log, i just realize about this when our suppor
On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:30 AM, Juergen Obermann wrote:
Hello,
today I switched from dovecot 1.1.17 to 1.2.6 and since then the
following new error messages
appeared. To me they seems to be harmless, as I noticed no problems
so far. But can I be sure?
Oct 7 08:39:13 smail dovecot: [ID 583609
On Oct 2, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
So if you really want Dovecot to be there, you need to use either
SQL (e.g. SQLite) or checkpassword passdb. Others can't just accept
all users without explicitly listing all of them. With SQL you
could do some
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
So if you really want Dovecot to be there, you need to use either
SQL (e.g. SQLite) or checkpassword passdb. Others can't just accept
all users without explicitly listing all of them. With SQL you could
do something like:
Why not ldap authentication off the MS AD?
On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
That still doesn't answer my question. It doesn't sound like you need
IMAP proxying. It sounds like you just need TCP connection forwarding.
Your true. TCP connection forwarding I can do fith PF, but
I think IMAP proxying more
--- Original Message ---
From: Timo Sirainen
To: Vitaliy Vladimirovich
Date: 2 october, 15:42:40
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP proxying for ALL users to internal mail server
On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
>> How must I adjust Dovecot for pr
On 10/2/2009, Vitaliy Vladimirovich (artem...@ukr.net) wrote:
>> Is this even a supported configuration? I've never heard of anyone doing
>> this.
> Why not? From dovecot WIKI:
>
> The destination servers don't need to be running Dovecot,
I stand corrected... I've never used the proxy
On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
How must I adjust Dovecot for proxying all users from the
Internet to the internal Exchange Mail Server?
To only a single Exchange server? Why would you need Dovecot proxy at
all there? Just use whatever dummy TCP proxy.
Yes, to on
--- Original Message ---
From: Timo Sirainen
To: "Vitaliy Vladimirovich"
Date: 2 october, 15:25:19
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP proxying for ALL users to internal mail server
On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
> How must I adjust Dovecot
On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
How must I adjust Dovecot for proxying all users from the
Internet to the internal Exchange Mail Server?
To only a single Exchange server? Why would you need Dovecot proxy at
all there? Just use whatever dummy TCP proxy.
--- Original Message ---
From: Charles Marcus
To: Vitaliy Vladimirovich
Date: 2 october, 15:20:18
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP proxying for ALL users to internal mail server
On 10/2/2009 8:14 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
> How must I adjust Dovecot for proxying all us
On 10/2/2009 8:14 AM, Vitaliy Vladimirovich wrote:
> How must I adjust Dovecot for proxying all users from the Internet to
> the internal Exchange Mail Server?
Is this even a supported configuration? I've never heard of anyone doing
this.
Dovecot proxy is intended to act as a proxy between multip
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 15:03, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Whops, should have read more mails before answering..
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:24 +0200, Robert Gabriel wrote:
> > Sorry, but that patch doesn't do it for me, still is crashing after
> applying
> > the patch.
>
> It really should have fixed
Whops, should have read more mails before answering..
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:24 +0200, Robert Gabriel wrote:
> Sorry, but that patch doesn't do it for me, still is crashing after applying
> the patch.
It really should have fixed it. If not, get a gdb backtrace.
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
This will help you: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/3132464fbe9c
1.2.6 should come out this week..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, but that patch doesn't do it for me, still is crashing after applying
the patch.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 13:13, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Robert Gabriel wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm using dovecot 1.2.5 with mysql backend and seems in this new
>> version
>> I have issues when loggin
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Robert Gabriel wrote:
Hi, I'm using dovecot 1.2.5 with mysql backend and seems in this new version
I have issues when loggin in, especially if there are mails in Inbox folder.
NOTE: version 1.2.4 worked perfectly and mysql was updated to version 5.0.86
from source code.
Her
Brent Bloxam wrote:
This issue was eerily close to a MySQL database structure change that shouldn't
have affected any related queries
Time to eat my words ;) Issue was related to the structure change by
another admin.
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 13:52 -0400, Jesse Vollmar wrote:
> dovecot: IMAP(i...@aedisit.com): maildir_file_do(/var/mail/
> > aedisit.com/info/cur/1251566335.V14I27a91M380600.kim): Filename keeps
> > changing
That happens always or just rarely? It really shouldn't be happening.
Can you reproduce this
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 01:57 -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> [r...@nac /var/vmail/xxx.com/spork/Maildir/.Spam]# ls new/| wc
> -l
> 70501
>
> Mail.app valiantly tried to sync this, but when I realized just how huge
> this was, I took the account offline and quit the app. However it seems
>
Thomas G. Lau wrote:
Dear All,
does anyone got any program which could benchmark imap and pop3 in
terms of message per second?
Check out MStone:
http://mstone.sourceforge.net/
and ImapTest:
http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest
Cheers,
Ron
Vasantha Narayan wrote:
Hello,
We are running dovecot 1.1.2 on a Solaris 10 box. We have been
running the same configuration for about a year without a problem.
We have a different cert for POP and IMAP.
Recently we made two changes. The cert for IMAP expired and we had
to install a new one.
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:23 -0700, Vasantha Narayan wrote:
> We cannot get a telnet connection to the IMAP port or a openssl
> connection to the IMAPS port. Kill -HUP of the dovecot server solves
> the problem. But again, when the usage increases, the problem
> surfaces again. There is no proble
Sorry, I forgot to specify the config file here is my real config:
# 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.28-15-server x86_64 Ubuntu 9.04 cifs
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imap pop3 imaps pop3s managesieve
ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-mail.pem
ssl_key_file:
Thanks for your squick respond.
The error must be in squirrelmail.
Thanks again
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Timo Sirainen"
To: "Jack Raats"
Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] imap error
On
inen"
To: "Jack Raats"
Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] imap error
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 07:56 +0200, Jack Raats wrote:
This morning I tried to read my mail using squirrelmail.
I cann't connect. I'll g
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 07:56 +0200, Jack Raats wrote:
> This morning I tried to read my mail using squirrelmail.
> I cann't connect. I'll get the following error:
>
> Aug 2 07:51:44 hera dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
> rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
> Aug 2 07:51:44 her
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
OK, that definitely means something's either deleting dovecot-uidlist
files or changing that mailbox's index files in some way, which then
causes the UIDVALIDITY changed errors and/or next_uid changed errors.
Neither should really be happening
* Timo Sirainen :
> ># zfgrep -h virus-al /var/log/OLD/2009-07-*/pop3d-imapd.log |grep
> >UIDVALIDITY
> >Jul 2 02:27:19 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al): Maildir /home/v/i/
> >virus-al/Maildir: UIDVALIDITY changed (1246493487 -> 1246494049)
> >Jul 2 22:25:34 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al): Maild
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Timo Sirainen :
Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir,
though.
Do you have any "UIDVALIDITY change
* Timo Sirainen :
> Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
> recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir, though.
> Do you have any "UIDVALIDITY changed" lines in logs?
# zfgrep -h virus-al /var/log/OLD/20
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 22:02 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen :
> > On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> >> Jun 20 15:00:13 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al):
> >> /home/v/i/virus-al/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: next_uid was lowered (70 ->
> >> 2)
> >
> > Any idea wh
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
>> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] imap-login: Disconnected
>>
>> On Må, 2009-07-13, 15:35 wrote Steffen Kaiser:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, gl...@remstedt.org wrote:
>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, gl...@remstedt.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: gl...@remstedt.org
To: Steffen Kaiser
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] imap-login: Disconnected
On Må, 2009-07-13, 15:35 wrote Steffen
On Må, 2009-07-13, 15:35 wrote Steffen Kaiser:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, gl...@remstedt.org wrote:
>
>>> Does squirrelmail connects to port 995, but is not using SSL?
>>
>> when testing SSL/TLS connections they all works i.e.
>>
>> # for pop:
>> open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, gl...@remstedt.org wrote:
Does squirrelmail connects to port 995, but is not using SSL?
when testing SSL/TLS connections they all works i.e.
# for pop:
openssl s_client -connect localhost:995
# for imap:
openssl s_client -co
On Må, 2009-07-13, 14:01 wrote Steffen Kaiser:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Glenn Remstedt wrote:
>
>> here are the output from dovecot-log:
>> Info: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=192.168.1.220,
>> lip=192.168.1.220,
TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Glenn Remstedt wrote:
here are the output from dovecot-log:
Info: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=192.168.1.220,
lip=192.168.1.220, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SSL23_GET_C
Le 11 juil. 09 à 12:53, Daniel Wallner a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Axel Luttgens<**> wrote:
Which port number is "imap" on your system?
Which port number is "imap2" on your system?
port number: 143
cat /etc/services | grep imap
imap2 143/tcp imap
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Which port number is "imap" on your system?
> Which port number is "imap2" on your system?
port number: 143
cat /etc/services | grep imap
imap2 143/tcp imap# Interim Mail Access P 2 and 4
imap2 143/ud
Le 11 juil. 09 à 11:19, Daniel Wallner a écrit :
hi,
mutt -f imap://m...@test.local@127.0.0.1
Could not connect to 127.0.0.1 (Connection refused).
Which port number is "imap" on your system?
lsof -i
dovecot 20200 root5u IPv4 233361 TCP
localhost:imap2 (LISTEN)
imap-logi
On 07/01/2009 11:55 AM Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
>> I want to calculate the bandwidth usage of the IMAP protocol. POP3
>
> Dovecot v1.2 has this:
>
> IMAP(*): Info: Disconnected: Logged out bytes=24/631
Dovecot v1.1 has it also, since 1.1.alpha1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
I want to calculate the bandwidth usage of the IMAP protocol. POP3
Dovecot v1.2 has this:
IMAP(*): Info: Disconnected: Logged out bytes=24/631
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> Jun 20 15:00:13 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al):
>> /home/v/i/virus-al/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: next_uid was lowered (70 ->
>> 2)
>
> Any idea why this happened? next_uid really shouldn't get lowered. Did
> something e
On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Jun 20 15:00:13 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al):
/home/v/i/virus-al/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist: next_uid was lowered (70
-> 2)
Any idea why this happened? next_uid really shouldn't get lowered. Did
something e.g. restore an older dovecot-ui
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:43 +0200, Olivier Cailloux wrote:
Since the change for dovecot, however, things are going strange.
Sometimes the labels disappear for some reasons. Sometimes they stay
there. And I can't reproduce the behavior, it just seems random. This is
v
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:43 +0200, Olivier Cailloux wrote:
> Since the change for dovecot, however, things are going strange.
> Sometimes the labels disappear for some reasons. Sometimes they stay
> there. And I can't reproduce the behavior, it just seems random. This is
> very annoying as it to
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:02 +0800, wallace0615 wrote:
> I compared the data that using the two way to send, and found the reason:
> use outlook and foxmail: at the beginning of the eamil data is "From
> zxjteacher_SP_LZU ";
> and if I telnet host 25 to send the mail: at the beginning of the eamil
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 04:54 +, Alaa Ibrahim wrote:
> I'm trying to put it in a plugin, but when I call
> imap_fetch_handlers_register(), it works
> but all other fetch handlers get removed, my init is
Oh, that's because my code looks like:
struct imap_fetch_context *imap_fetch_init(struct cl
I'm trying to put it in a plugin, but when I call
imap_fetch_handlers_register(), it works
but all other fetch handlers get removed, my init is
void savedate_plugin_init(void)
{
const struct imap_fetch_handler savedate_handler[1] = {
{ "X-SAVEDATE", fetch_x_savedate_init }
};
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 00:25 +, Alaa Ibrahim wrote:
> I want to add a feature to the fetch command in IMAP, by enabling it to
> return the save
> date, when I request the SAVEDATE parameter.
> I want to use this for my webmail application, so I can show the users the
> deleted date
> when they
On 5/18/2009, wallace0615 (wallace0...@126.com) wrote:
> I have no porblems to login.
> When I use "telent host 25" to send a email, dovecot read it no problems.
> But when I use outlook and foxmail to send a email, dovecot cann't read the
> email data.
Dovecot is not an smtp server. It does not
on 5-14-2009 5:11 AM Frank Bonnet spake the following:
> Hello folks
>
> I have a problem related to the mbox format I think
>
> First we use MBOX format with Dovecot 1.14
>
> A user's here need to create some subfolders in his Imap space.
>
> Due to the use of MBOX format this is impossible fr
Curtis Maloney wrote:
Jarosław Przybyłowicz wrote:
Hi,
could you please tell me if there is a way, to make dovecot notify my
mail client of new messages in inbox subfolders?
I'm using fdm to fetch mails into maildir and proper subfolders. So
far, when idleing mozilla gets a notification when
Jarosław Przybyłowicz wrote:
Hi,
could you please tell me if there is a way, to make dovecot notify my
mail client of new messages in inbox subfolders?
I'm using fdm to fetch mails into maildir and proper subfolders. So far,
when idleing mozilla gets a notification when new message arrives in
On May 1, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Jarosław Przybyłowicz wrote:
could you please tell me if there is a way, to make dovecot notify
my mail client of new messages in inbox subfolders?
No. IMAP protocol doesn't really allow that. Dovecot could try to send
STATUS events, but I've no idea if TB would
Jarosław Przybyłowicz schreef:
>
>> This is a TB 'issue', it does not check other folders than inbox for new
>> mail. Problem can be fixed by setting
>> "mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new" to true in Config editor.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>
> Actually, i tried this as well, bu
This is a TB 'issue', it does not check other folders than inbox for new
mail. Problem can be fixed by setting
"mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new" to true in Config editor.
--
Regards,
Tom
Actually, i tried this as well, but nothing happened.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryp
Jarosław Przybyłowicz schreef:
> Hi,
>
> could you please tell me if there is a way, to make dovecot notify my
> mail client of new messages in inbox subfolders?
> I'm using fdm to fetch mails into maildir and proper subfolders. So far,
> when idleing mozilla gets a notification when new message a
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 16:20 +0100, Seba wrote:
>> dovecot.conf
>> =
>
> dovecot -n is preferred to copy&pasting the actual config file.
>
> Anyway it looks like you're missing:
>
> plugin {
> acl = vfile:
> }
thanks Timo. I've added the above section and now it's O
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 16:20 +0100, Seba wrote:
> dovecot.conf
> =
dovecot -n is preferred to copy&pasting the actual config file.
Anyway it looks like you're missing:
plugin {
acl = vfile:
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 3/18/2009, Seba (free...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> I've some problems to get folder ACLs working with Dovecot. I've
> defined some folders (like drafts, spam etc.) for every user and
> created a dovecot-acl file in every folder so that users can not
> delete or rename these folders but this does
> On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 21:50 +0100, RutgerM wrote:
>> #!/bin/sh
>> unset LOG_TO_MASTER
>> export USE_SYSLOG=1
>> exec /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
>>
>> But this logs the user that runs the script into the imap server and
>> when
>> I terminate this terminal I get a "Disconnected" message for the local
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 21:50 +0100, RutgerM wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> unset LOG_TO_MASTER
> export USE_SYSLOG=1
> exec /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
>
> But this logs the user that runs the script into the imap server and when
> I terminate this terminal I get a "Disconnected" message for the local
> linux user
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> If you set mbox_read_locks=dotlock, it should get created
> whenever Dovecot is reading the mbox file. But it's
> created ONLY during those times. For example opening a
> mailbox whose index files are up-to-date doesn't cause
> dotlock to be created. A
on 3-4-2009 11:23 AM Mark Hedges spake the following:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> If you set mbox_read_locks=dotlock, it should get created
>> whenever Dovecot is reading the mbox file. But it's
>> created ONLY during those times. For example opening a
>> mailbox whose index files
On 3/4/2009, Mark Hedges (hed...@scriptdolphin.org) wrote:
> I think the only real answer is to lock the user's password,
> kill any dovecot processes with the username in verbose
> proctitle (-HUP? -KILL?), then run my expiration script on
> their mailboxes. OR, use horde.
I was going to say...
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:23 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > If you set mbox_read_locks=dotlock, it should get created
> > whenever Dovecot is reading the mbox file. But it's
> > created ONLY during those times. For example opening a
> > mailbox whose index f
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> If you set mbox_read_locks=dotlock, it should get created
> whenever Dovecot is reading the mbox file. But it's
> created ONLY during those times. For example opening a
> mailbox whose index files are up-to-date doesn't cause
> dotlock to be created. And w
on 3-3-2009 3:15 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
>> You could use dovecot's deliver and then you won't need to
>> worry about procmails locking.
>
> That's not going to happen either, a large portion of the
> application depends on procmail filtering, a
On Mar 3, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Mark Hedges wrote:
Ah. Well, the last choice is then:
mbox_read_locks = dotlock
mbox_write_locks = dotlock
Dotlocking for reading isn't really optimal, but shouldn't
really make much of a difference usually.
I tried that before, that would be great if it worked fo
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
> You could use dovecot's deliver and then you won't need to
> worry about procmails locking.
That's not going to happen either, a large portion of the
application depends on procmail filtering, and that is
totally entrenched.
Mark
on 3-3-2009 2:55 PM Mark Hedges spake the following:
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> How does IMAP lock the /var/spool/mail/user file?
mbox_read_locks and mbox_write_locks defines it.
>>> mbox_read_locks = fcntl
>>> mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl
>>>
>>> Unfortunately ope
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > You can change those settings. For example:
> > >
> > > mbox_read_locks = flock
> > > mbox_write_locks = dotlock flock
> > >
> > > Now Dovecot is compatible with openwebmail. And with
> > > procmail both are still protected by the dotlock.
> >
> > No
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:55 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > > How does IMAP lock the /var/spool/mail/user file?
> > > > mbox_read_locks and mbox_write_locks defines it.
> > >
> > > mbox_read_locks = fcntl
> > > mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl
> > >
>
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > How does IMAP lock the /var/spool/mail/user file?
> > > mbox_read_locks and mbox_write_locks defines it.
> >
> > mbox_read_locks = fcntl
> > mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl
> >
> > Unfortunately openwebmail only respects dotlocks. (or
> > flock,
601 - 700 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
