On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 07:28 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Is there any reason to follow the 1.3 tree?
Only if you want to test multi-dbox and v2.0 tree is broken. I'm not
planning on doing any more updates to 1.3 tree.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I'll break down and ask the stupid question...
Does this mean there will not be a V1.3 release?
I'm currently at 1.1.8 and using mbox. Any comments about the
advisability of going to 1.1.14?
Better for going to v1.2? What does the crystal ball show for 1.2.0?
As always thanks for all the
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 14:01 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
I'll break down and ask the stupid question...
Does this mean there will not be a V1.3 release?
Yes. v2.0 will come after v1.2.
I'm currently at 1.1.8 and using mbox. Any comments about the
advisability of going to 1.1.14?
Better than
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/
I just did the initial commit for master process rewrite, which marks
the beginning of Dovecot v2.0. Several things are still missing/
broken,
but at least I was just able to successfully log in using imap
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/
I just did the initial commit for master process rewrite, which marks
the beginning of Dovecot v2.0. Several things are still missing/broken,
but at least I was just able to successfully log
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Odhiambo ? wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/
How do I retrieve a copy for testing? Can I do svn co ... ?
http://www.dovecot.org/download.html
Search for Mercurial Repo
