On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:45:13 -0500
Stewart Dean sd...@bard.edu wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think*
is no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
I'm wondering if there is something we can tell users to use when
Things Are Dire. GUI would be better
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:11:25 +
Mário Barbosa mplbarb...@clix.pt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:45:13 -0500
Stewart Dean sd...@bard.edu wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think*
is no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
I'm wondering if there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Stewart Dean wrote:
telling me there were still 135,000 messages. In the end, I had to kill the
TBird profile for that account and recreate it.
Yeah, the first and only time I opened the Postmaster mailbox with
Thunderbird,
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:40:01PM +0200]:
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:26 +, Jose Celestino wrote:
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
Pine and Alpine are about the only clients (besides
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:26 +, Jose Celestino wrote:
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
no longer supported)? GUI or TTY
Stewart Dean wrote:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one
* Stewart Dean sd...@bard.edu:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a
Stewart Dean schrieb:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one
On 12/15/2008, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it probably was working
furiously to try
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/15/2008, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it
On 12/15/2008 2:34 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it probably was working
furiously to try to
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/15/2008 2:34 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it
On 12/15/2008, Stewart Dean (sd...@bard.edu) wrote:
I would like Tbird to do just what it does now, but be more robust
(and maybe a little quicker) about it. Bombproof, as they say.
I'm with you there, and I've read that the new 3.0 will have a lot of
IMAP improvements, but haven't tried it
Is there a simple robust IMAP client
Yes: mutt. One of the reasons we use mutt not only for regular mail access, but
for troubleshooting: it simply does what you tell it to do. It doesn't try to
be clever or try to do what it thinks you actually wanted to do.
Apart from that, it's scriptable
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:34 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
With sigh, I know, I know a mbox format inbox, I don't know that it
matters much whether it's 10 files or 10,000...it's still gotta haul out
the whole ugly thing.
Aha, mbox. And pine is your last resort (as you stated in a follow up)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:45:13PM -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
[...]
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is no
longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
I switched from Pine to Mutt (quite a while ago) and to me,
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
Pine and Alpine are about the only clients (besides webmails) that can
open a mailbox without downloading every single
18 matches
Mail list logo
