On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:17, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
Where is the reply to list button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
either. All it has are reply and reply to all. The reply sends to the
sender alone if it's a case
On 21.5.2010, at 16.04, Phil Howard wrote:
There are a number of posters on the list where the reply goes directly to
the list alone. I don't know what it is they do with the headers to get it
to come out that way. Maybe you can ask them what they do, then do that.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:45, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
like you said, you dont really do mail servers
Id LOVE to see you try even 100K users in mail server situation that is
ever changing, you'd soon open your eyes up.
I know it would mean more hits to the DB.
The
On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
Where is the reply to list button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
either. All it has are reply and reply to all. The reply sends to the
sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 addresses to send to (reply to
all would send to 2 in that
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/21/2010 10:17 AM:
On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
Where is the reply to list button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
either. All it has are reply and reply to all. The reply sends to the
sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 addresses to
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 17:14, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
I guess you've never used it with tens and tens of thousands of users, let
alone user numbers well into 6 figures
and why on gods (or any) earth would I use that load of crap being backed
up by another form? that
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:46, Eray Aslan eray.as...@caf.com.tr wrote:
We use Michael Tokarev's tinycdb:
* stable on disk format
* has atomic updates
* has a tiny library in case you want to link it statically
* uses a lot less memory when the process count is large, i.e. scales well
*
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:54 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
I guess you've been bitten by a proper database solution given
your apprehension for using one.
It's called experience. I could explain many cases where SQL is
overkill and overhead. But I don't do mail
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
CDB, oh dear god, you want to go back in time?
CDB is no better than any other flatfile based system, it was horrible
with qmail and it'll be horrible with anything else above a couple
thousand users, you clearly dont
On 05/18/2010 12:14 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
its your network (I hope for your sake).. its up to you how
efficient it
is.
CDB is very fast.
yes it is, if you only have a small number of users.
We use Michael
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
And it did seem to do that already. Mail was sent to dovecot/deliver.
It
included the domain name. But deliver just didn't construct the
mail_location correctly due to %d being empty. The resulting path with
the
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:05 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
%d is derived from the right hand side of a username, dovecot's deliver
couldn't care less about verifying the domain, since that is the MTA's
job.
No
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
Please post the output of dovecot -n and postconf -n. Better,
provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
I have redacted external IP addresses and domain names.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
Please post the output of dovecot -n and postconf -n. Better,
provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.netwrote:
I have to admit that I am somewhat confused. You have postfix listed
as user/group in the dovecot.conf file, yet you have vmail listed as
the user in 'master.cf. That doesn't look right.
I'm not sure which way
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.netwrote:
Post back if you get this fixed.
Bsically, what I need to know from THIS list is exactly what conditions the
dovecot/deliver program needs in order to properly fill in the %d variable
for mail_location. Once I
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.netwrote:
Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix to do
the delivery. I want Dovecot to do the delivery so it can create the
additional
On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix
to do
the delivery. I want
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht
bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
This
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:17 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht
bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
Virtual
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm getting this ...
May 10 12:45:01 eth0 postfix/local[3416]: A788D685F7: to=
x...@.net, relay=local, delay=13, delays=13/0/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
Just realized my email was not going to the list.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:20, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
I am using static uids:
mail_uid = vmail
mail_gid = vmail
user = vmail
group = vmail
else it will do what you describe.
I have that, too. But it's not running the
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:42, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
Absolutely right!
But it's an interim test ... in this case to see what userid
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:07, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
I dont know what else.
I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail, vmail:postfix
and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
I believe that is because Postfix is running dovecot/deliver as
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:27 -0500
Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com articulated:
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
From my 'master.cf' file:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
-f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
From 'main.cf' file:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:35:15 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
From my 'master.cf' file:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:58, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
Be sure to read the entire page.
I have a few times. But now I'm getting a bit of a different perspective on
part of it. The parameters are:
-d username: Destination username.
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then
perform a query for it and have dovecot group users by domain, this
way i can have us...@example.net and us...@example.com
Thanks
--
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for
case folding.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What does change the format of the username mean?
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then perform
a query for
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:23, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for case
folding.
But what is next hop? I don't have any next hop
On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:30:48 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com
wrote:
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What does change the format of the username mean?
37 matches
Mail list logo
