On 10/06/2017 17:26, Michael Felt wrote:
On 10/06/2017 17:23, Michael Felt wrote:
On 10/06/2017 14:42, Michael Felt wrote:
Next chapter in packaging.(Not meant to be extensive, only what I
run across and is easy to report)
So, now in an attempt to report on where I am at...
On 10/06/2017 17:23, Michael Felt wrote:
On 10/06/2017 14:42, Michael Felt wrote:
Next chapter in packaging.(Not meant to be extensive, only what I run
across and is easy to report)
c)
378 | int quota_root_default_init(struct quota_root *root, const
char *args,
379 |
On 10/06/2017 14:42, Michael Felt wrote:
Next chapter in packaging.(Not meant to be extensive, only what I run
across and is easy to report)
c)
378 | int quota_root_default_init(struct quota_root *root, const
char *args,
379 | const char **error_r)
On 09/10/2016 21:48, Michael Felt wrote:
I finally decided it was really time to stop being lazy and really
move away from gmail. After I have a server in my basement using
power, etc.
So I turned on the imap provided - and did not quite cry - it will
have to do for now, but imap2 is
On 07/06/2017 07:58, Aki Tuomi wrote:
The test summary says okay, but I see 'Error' in the diagnostics. Did
all go as expected? (p.s. this is not the only area where there is
'Error', but test says 'ok'.
Regards,
Michael
Those errors are expected errors, since the test is about making sure
On 06.06.2017 21:30, Michael Felt wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 21:48, Michael Felt wrote:
>>
>> A real server yes, but not Linux. (Using linux would require another
>> server AND I would feel I am being lazy again).
>
> Well, I have been busy, and it is time to force move dovecot forward.
>
> Being
On 09/10/2016 21:48, Michael Felt wrote:
A real server yes, but not Linux. (Using linux would require another
server AND I would feel I am being lazy again).
Well, I have been busy, and it is time to force move dovecot forward.
Being 'lazy' I am doing some initial tests on my POWER platform
Hi Micheal,
I am currently working on AIX + VAC + NTPv4 build. and I have also faced
same issues as mentioned by you in link
https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-October/105597.html
Wondering if you have got any resolution for above issue.
If yes, please help me with your guidance.
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
It should be supported by AIX:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGH3R_13.1.3/com.ibm.xlcpp1313.aix.doc/language_ref/compound_literals.html
OK - it is supported, but "not in the same way as gcc".
Getting it to simplified cases:
No GO
On 10/10/2016 19:44, Michael Felt wrote:
+11 main()
+12 {
+13 http_auth_param_t b[] = {
+14 (http_auth_param_t) { .p1 = "c1" },
+15 (http_auth_param_t) { .p2 = "e2" }
+16 };
+17
+18 printf("%s\n", a[0].p1);
On 10/10/2016 17:29, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 17:16 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
It should be supported by AIX:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGH3R_13.1.3/com.ibm.xlcpp1313.aix.doc/language_ref/compound_literals.html
I have no idea why it would fail here.
I see it is also in version 11 - so, maybe still syntax:
On 10/10/2016 17:29, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 17:16 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in
Op 10-10-2016 om 17:16 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report.
Aki
On 10/10/2016 14:59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report.
Aki
I would guess this is not "c99" way...
It
Op 10-10-2016 om 14:39 schreef Michael Felt:
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report.
Aki
I would guess this is not "c99" way...
It seems to fail on a C99 feature called Compound
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Does your build end at some particular point?
See DETAILS for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report.
Aki
I would guess this is not "c99" way...
Making all in lib-http
source='test-http-auth.c' object='test-http-auth.o' libtool=no
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We do already support various non-GNU platforms, but our code does expect C99
conforming compiler these days. We also use autotools and libtool. rpcgen
should be available, at least according to
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We do already support various non-GNU platforms, but our code does expect C99
conforming compiler these days. We also use autotools and libtool. rpcgen
should be available, at least according to
> On October 10, 2016 at 3:57 AM Michael Felt wrote:
>
>
> On 09-Oct-16 22:51, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael
> >
> > Does the compiler support C99 standard?
> >
> > Aki
>
> Yes. Plus extended features. Key difference with GCC, e.g., are the
> flags to the
On 09-Oct-16 22:51, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Michael
Does the compiler support C99 standard?
Aki
Yes. Plus extended features. Key difference with GCC, e.g., are the
flags to the compiler, but autotools general manages those well.
Key difference with platform (well, of of) is that it is not
On 09.10.2016 22:48, Michael Felt wrote:
Hi.
I finally decided it was really time to stop being lazy and really
move away from gmail. After I have a server in my basement using
power, etc.
So I turned on the imap provided - and did not quite cry - it will
have to do for now, but imap2 is
22 matches
Mail list logo