> On 15 Mar 2021, at 14:17, Sylvhem wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 14 mars 2021 à 21:13 +0100, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>> On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any
> progress
> in implementing the
Le dimanche 14 mars 2021 à 21:13 +0100, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any
> > > > progress
> > > > in implementing the RFC 6531?
> > >
> > >
On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> in implementing the RFC 6531?
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html
Sorry, I was on the wrong list.
is there hope to see dns server support
On 2021-03-14 17:26, Sylvhem wrote:
Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit :
It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
time I heard about it, it was worked on.
Does anybody have news about that?
I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> > > time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> > > Does anybody have news about that?
> > >
> >
> > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> > in implementing the RFC
> > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> > time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> > Does anybody have news about that?
> >
>
> I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
> in implementing the RFC 6531?
Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
> time I heard about it, it was worked on.
> Does anybody have news about that?
>
I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress
in
sendmail is (also) still lacking this.
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot On Behalf Of Sylvhem
> Sent: 23 February 2021 13:50
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
>
> Hi!
>
> It’s been some time since I last saw
Hi!
It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last
time I heard about it, it was worked on.
Does anybody have news about that?
--
Sylvhem
Hi,
same here, I updated my hole mail infrustructure (postfix, milter, etc.).
Now only dovecot does not support SMTPUTF8, which forced me to disable it
compleetly on my edgeservers.
Thanks
Urban
Am 17.03.20 um 09:52 schrieb David Bürgin:
I haven’t seen this term on the mailing list for a
I haven’t seen this term on the mailing list for a while. I don’t know
if you’re tracking this somewhere, in any case I’m curious if you are
still planning to add support for SMTPUTF8.
Cheers,
Dovecot does not work as the "final mile" delivery host in a fully-compliant
SMTPUTF8 chain.
This is on the (long) list of things todo.
michael
> On April 6, 2019 at 6:53 AM "@lbutlr via dovecot" wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Apr 2019, at 13:47, André Rodier via dovecot wrote:
> >
> >>
On 5 Apr 2019, at 13:47, André Rodier via dovecot wrote:
>
>> root@portal:/etc/postfix# postmap -q andré@homebox.space
>> ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
>> andre@homebox.space
You have a solution that properly maps UTF to a non-UTF namespace. As I
understand it, SMTPUTF8 uses a UTF8
quite sure you have it working?
>>>>
>>>> In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn’t
>>>> have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by
>>>> another Dovecot developer last September (it ‘is being considered’
ead someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn’t
> > > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by
> > > another Dovecot developer last September (it ‘is being considered’ was
> > > the answer then, see
> > > https://dovecot.or
On 06/04/2019 10:07, André Rodier via dovecot wrote:
> On 05/04/2019 08:57, David Bürgin via dovecot wrote:
>> André, are you quite sure you have it working?
>>
>> In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn’t
>> have SMTPUTF8 support impleme
Am 05.04.19 um 22:36 schrieb David Bürgin via dovecot:
I’m afraid there is a possibility that your setup only works by chance …
I don’t think Dovecot LMTP is SMTPUTF8-capable according to RFC 6531. It
needs to advertise the SMTPUTF8 extension but doesn’t.
[..]
Dovecot doesn't know anything
On 05/04/2019 08:57, David Bürgin via dovecot wrote:
André, are you quite sure you have it working?
In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn’t
have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by
another Dovecot developer last September
I’m afraid there is a possibility that your setup only works by chance …
I don’t think Dovecot LMTP is SMTPUTF8-capable according to RFC 6531. It
needs to advertise the SMTPUTF8 extension but doesn’t.
# nc -U /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp
220 mail.my.org Dovecot ready.
LHLO mail.my.org
Well, what a puzzle. I will have to investigate. I also tried it with
Gmail, and the failure was definitely between Postfix and Dovecot LMTP,
with Dovecot failing to advertise SMTPUTF8 support. My setup is much
more minimal, I use file-based virtual mailboxes and aliases, and only
OpenDKIM
On 2019-04-05 08:57, David Bürgin via dovecot wrote:
> André, are you quite sure you have it working?
>
> In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot
> doesn’t
> have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by
> another Dovecot develo
André, are you quite sure you have it working?
In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn’t
have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by
another Dovecot developer last September (it ‘is being considered’ was
the answer then, see
https
On 2019-04-05 02:44, sylvhem--- via dovecot wrote:
Le 2019-04-04 03:28, André a écrit :
I have it working, only with the user part of the email address.
It works well, as long as the whole chain of software is correctly
configured.
I have not tested with a whole domain in UTF8 yet.
More
Le 2019-04-04 03:28, André a écrit :
I have it working, only with the user part of the email address.
It works well, as long as the whole chain of software is correctly
configured.
I have not tested with a whole domain in UTF8 yet.
More details and working examples here:
I have it working, only with the user part of the email address.
It works well, as long as the whole chain of software is correctly configured.
I have not tested with a whole domain in UTF8 yet.
More details and working examples here:
https://github.com/progmaticltd/homebox
Good luck.
On 4
Le 2019-04-04 01:36, Michael Slusarz a écrit :
On April 3, 2019 at 10:12 PM sylvhem--- via dovecot
wrote:
I'm currently trying to set up SMTPUTF8 on my mail stack, but I can't
find any information on Dovecot's RFC 6531 support. Has it been
implemented yet?
No.
michael
Thank you for the
> On April 3, 2019 at 10:12 PM sylvhem--- via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> I'm currently trying to set up SMTPUTF8 on my mail stack, but I can't
> find any information on Dovecot's RFC 6531 support. Has it been
> implemented yet?
No.
michael
Hi,
I'm currently trying to set up SMTPUTF8 on my mail stack, but I can't
find any information on Dovecot's RFC 6531 support. Has it been
implemented yet? If so, does anyone know how to activate it?
Regards.
--
Sylvhem
28 matches
Mail list logo
