Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Charles Marcus
On 1/27/2016 9:32 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Charles Marcus wrote: > >> On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>> Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Sami Ketola
On 27/01/16 04:35, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote: I have a domain with about 50 mailboxes, server is located here in AUS but most of the users are on a LAN is SEAsia location. They were using POP (with Thunderbird), I suggested then can use IMAP instead, so they did. now they are asking; "Looks

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Daniel Tröder
On 01/27/2016 03:35 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote: > I have a domain with about 50 mailboxes, server is located here in AUS but > most of the users are on a LAN is SEAsia location. They were using POP > (with Thunderbird), I suggested then can use IMAP instead, so they did. > > now they are asking;

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Charles Marcus wrote: On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP append to the sent mailbox. Can you elaborate on this? I

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Håkon Alstadheim
Den 27. jan. 2016 07:30, skrev Steffen Kaiser: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote: > > > I have a domain with about 50 mailboxes, server is located here in > AUS but > > most of the users are on a LAN is SEAsia location. They were using POP > > (with Thunderbird), I suggested then can

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-27 Thread Charles Marcus
On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP append > to the sent mailbox. Hi Steffen, Can you elaborate on this? I would have thought that the IMAP Append command would *save* bandwidth (as

Re: ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-26 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote: I have a domain with about 50 mailboxes, server is located here in AUS but most of the users are on a LAN is SEAsia location. They were using POP (with Thunderbird), I suggested then can use IMAP

ot: data consumption IMAP vs POP

2016-01-26 Thread voytek
I have a domain with about 50 mailboxes, server is located here in AUS but most of the users are on a LAN is SEAsia location. They were using POP (with Thunderbird), I suggested then can use IMAP instead, so they did. now they are asking; "Looks like Imap is adding a lot to our internet