On 19 Jun 2019, at 17:37, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
> On 20/06/2019 01:20, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>> On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>>> I don’t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it
>>> is still using a single delimiter only despite
On 20/06/2019 01:20, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
I don’t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it is
still using a single delimiter only despite postfix having added support for
more than one years ago.
Ideas?
On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> I don’t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it
> is still using a single delimiter only despite postfix having added support
> for more than one years ago.
Ideas?
--
Lead me not into temptation, I can find
Since many broken websites and idiot companies will not allow a ‘+’ in an email
address, I have long used two delimiters in postfix:
recipient_delimiter = +_
However, now that dovecot is handling verification for postfix via
reject_unverified_recipient, dovecot complains about any address
Thank you Christian. That led me right and it's working as I wish now.
Sincerely,
Fabian Santiago
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 4:25 AM, Christian Kivalo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 15. November 2015 01:46:29 MEZ, schrieb fsanti...@garbage-juice.com:
>> Hello,
>>
Hi,
Am 15. November 2015 01:46:29 MEZ, schrieb fsanti...@garbage-juice.com:
>Hello,
>
>I have a forum system which can potentially have users send email to it
>
>for posting purposes that arrives addressed to a particular user
>account
>with a recipient delimiter:
>
>user+1a2b3c4d5...@domain.com
Hello,
I have a forum system which can potentially have users send email to it
for posting purposes that arrives addressed to a particular user account
with a recipient delimiter:
user+1a2b3c4d5...@domain.com
The forum server is supposed to check the "user" account mailbox's inbox
for the
On Mon, 30 May 2011 10:52:37 +1000
Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com articulated:
(BTW I got this message in my spam folder it must not like the
dollar signs?)
Interesting! I hope this does not end up in the Spam folder also. Out
of morbid curiosity, did it give any indication why it
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 10:52:37 +1000
Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com articulated:
(BTW I got this message in my spam folder it must not like the
dollar signs?)
Interesting! I hope this does not end up in
Nick Edwards wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 10:52:37 +1000
Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com articulated:
(BTW I got this message in my spam folder it must not like the
dollar signs?)
Interesting! I hope this
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2011 17:53:38 +1000
Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com articulated:
our postfix master.cf is
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=mail:mail
Is there a known workaround for users who want to use the old recipient
delimiter plus sign method of sorting their mail? eg: foo.bat
+dove...@example.com foe.blow%2bdove...@example.com
This does not work with postfix/dovecot, but if we tell
postfix/system-passwd to use the recipient_delimiter =
On Sat, 28 May 2011 17:53:38 +1000
Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com articulated:
Is there a known workaround for users who want to use the old
recipient delimiter plus sign method of sorting their mail? eg:
foo.bat +dove...@example.com foe.blow%2bdove...@example.com
This does not work
13 matches
Mail list logo