Re: ssl_dh

2019-05-27 Thread Aki Tuomi via dovecot
On 27 May 2019 23:41 @lbutlr via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote: Does ssl_dh need to be manually updated each time the underlying certificate renews? -- 2+2=5 for sufficiently

ssl_dh

2019-05-27 Thread @lbutlr via dovecot
Does ssl_dh need to be manually updated each time the underlying certificate renews? -- 2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2.

Re: ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread sergio via dovecot
On 16/03/2019 17:07, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: ssl_dh is required from 2.3.0-2.3.2. From 2.3.3 onwards its optional. You can rm the ssl-parameters.dat file to get rid of that warning. Should wiki be updated? -- sergio.

Re: ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread sergio via dovecot
On 16/03/2019 23:25, Kostya Vasilyev via dovecot wrote: Did you check /var/lib/dovecot Sorry, no! Works fine now, thank you (: -- sergio.

Re: ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread Kostya Vasilyev via dovecot
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, at 11:12 PM, sergio via dovecot wrote: > I'm subscribed, please reply to list directly. > > > ssl_dh is required from 2.3.0-2.3.2. From 2.3.3 onwards its optional. > > You can rm the ssl-parameters.dat file to get rid of that warning. > > I have no

Re: ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread sergio via dovecot
I'm subscribed, please reply to list directly. ssl_dh is required from 2.3.0-2.3.2. From 2.3.3 onwards its optional. You can rm the ssl-parameters.dat file to get rid of that warning. I have no ssl-parameters.dat file. -- sergio.

Re: ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread Aki Tuomi via dovecot
ssl_dh is required from 2.3.0-2.3.2. From 2.3.3 onwards its optional. You can rm the ssl-parameters.dat file to get rid of that warning. Aki On 16 March 2019 12:50 sergio via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org>

ssl_dh

2019-03-16 Thread sergio via dovecot
https://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration says: "Since v2.3.3+ Diffie-Hellman parameters have been made optional, and you are encouraged to disable non-ECC DH algorithms completely." and a bit later: "From version 2.3, you must specify path to DH parameters file usi

Re: ssl_dh required, even though DH is disabled.

2018-08-03 Thread Aki Tuomi
; Original message > From: Eric Toombs > Date: 16/07/2018 08:41 (GMT+02:00) > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: ssl_dh required, even though DH is disabled. > > Here's my config: > > # 2.3.2 (582970113): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 4.17.5

Re: ssl_dh required, even though DH is disabled.

2018-07-16 Thread Aki Tuomi
This is a known issue, but thanks for reporting it. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Eric Toombs Date: 16/07/2018 08:41 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: ssl_dh required, even though DH is disabled. Here's my config: # 2.3.2 (582970113): /etc

ssl_dh required, even though DH is disabled.

2018-07-15 Thread Eric Toombs
=<4sGi5/9w3pwKAAAB> While providing an ssl_dh is only a minor annoyance, it would be nice if I didn't have to.