Charles Marcus wrote:
Azher Amin, on 6/28/2007 1:22 AM, said the following:
Hi Timo,
Thnx one of the error is gone due to duplicate passdbs, thnx. However
following error is persistant. I restarted my sendmail, dovecot etc.
changed the group permission as you mentioned.
You never
On 28.6.2007, at 5.12, Mark Edwards wrote:
Unless I specifically have /var/mail/virtual returned as home in
the ldap lookup, deliver can't find the directory. In other words,
it doesn't seem to respect the above mail_location setting. In
addition, if I don't have a pre-existing maildir
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:18 +0200, Geoffroy Desvernay wrote:
Tony Tsang a écrit :
Hi all,
I have some machines running FreeBSD and dovecot deployed. User's home
dir is on NFS mount and I've found that dovecot only works with
dotlock file locking mechanism, fcntl and flock failed. Now
Hello friends!
Is it possible to make deliver delivery a message without making a lookup
using virtual users?
I've read the section Without a Lookup (http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA) in
the wiki but I can´t do the same thing in my config and I can´t figure this
out. From the forum I found this
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 08:17 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
Jun 27 18:56:52 mini deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): auth input:
mail=mark
You're overriding it with mark.
I see. Well, my aim is to avoid having to prefix my mailbox entries
in my LDAP database with maildir:, and to avoid having
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 11:11 -0300, Bruno Puga wrote:
HOME=/path/to/user/homedir deliver -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I receive the
message: Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
If you're going to run deliver without -d, you must not be running it as
root.
signature.asc
Though there are conversion scripts, I'd like to give the convert
plugin a chance. I have Dovecot 1.0.1 on Trustix Secure Linux 2.2
(Linux 2.4.27), and we had UW IMAP 2002e. Dovecot seems to work OK
(e.g. I can add copy messages to it), but things break when I activate
the convert plugin.
The
On Jun 28, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
My dovecot-ldap.conf contains:
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,mailbox=mail
I'm setting mailbox=mail because otherwise dovecot uses postfix's
destination, which is the entire destination email address. Are my
only choices to either use
It seems as if the flock does not have any effect on the corrupting of the
transaction logs. Additionally, I would not be prepared to use dotlock as
its performance is detrimental to the server's load at busy times.
Ronald.
On 27/06/07, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, ext3 would be
FWIW, the Dovecot 1.0.1 convert plugin works with all my UW-IMAP
mboxes moved to ~/mail. At least that shows that my system otherwise
works. Also, I wrote a script to move the mboxes and preserve the
IMAP subscriptions. (I hope the list accepts the attached script.)
move_mail.sh
Description:
Hello,
I have a mail server which I upgraded yesterday.
OLD:
Redhat 9
sendmail (very old version)
UW ipop3d
usermin with readmail module for webmail access (very old version)
NEW:
Fedora Core 6
sendmail 8.13.8
Usermin for webmail again
dovecot 1.0.0
# /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: pop3
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Home directory is used wherever you have ~/ or %h. Or in your case
because you tried to use a relative mail_location path and Dovecot
chdired to home dir.
So, is it correct
that mail_location is the rule, unless mail is set in user_attrs, in
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:52 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
One thing that still puzzles me is why userdb has to be set at all.
In my case its totally unnecessary as far as I can tell, yet I get
errors if I don't set it or set it to nothing. I have it set to
return the home attribute right
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:52 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
One thing that still puzzles me is why userdb has to be set at all.
In my case its totally unnecessary as far as I can tell, yet I get
errors if I don't set it or set it to nothing. I
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:12 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason for userdb to return uid and gid ini my case, in fact I have
it
On 28.6.2007, at 23.05, Andy Fadich wrote:
The message does have the X-IMAP Header intact.(X-IMAP: 1183060687
02) The email is hidden when using a pop3 client(doesn't
download
it), or telnetting an account and using the LIST command.The
problem I
am having is that within
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.6.2007, at 23.10, Mark Edwards wrote:
For v1.1 I'll add new global mail_uid and mail_gid settings. Then
if you
use them userdb won't be needed.
I am using user_global_uid and user_global_gid, and so there is no
reason for userdb to
Andy Fadich spake the following on 6/28/2007 3:27 PM:
What do you mean The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3 Do you mean that
internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
Ill go look for some answers on webmins website also. Thanks for the help.
Andy
That is definitely the
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:49 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
Andy Fadich spake the following on 6/28/2007 3:27 PM:
What do you mean The same happens with UW-IMAP/POP3 Do you mean that
internal data message is standard with both dovecot and ipop3d?
Ill go look for some answers on webmins
20 matches
Mail list logo
