I would like to set up an active-active fault tolerance couple of mail servers.
Is the following procedure correct?
Let's suppose I want to set up two servers for acme.com, mail1.acme.com and
mail2.acme.com
I declare both servers as MX in DNS configuration.
Mailbox are stored in maildir
The Doctor put forth on 8/20/2010 9:24 PM:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:22:09PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 23:37 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
Aug 18 23:25:31 doctor dovecot: log: Error: net_accept() failed: Invalid
argument
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/565f18727209
Hi Timo,
thanks again for pointing out the missing userdb configuration entry
yesterday. Now that both Dovecot 2.0.0 servers are running fine, I use
the following command to backup mail data from serverA to serverB in a
shell script running on serverB, looping over user names:
[oops, apparently I didn't reply this to the list]
Tim Traver wrote:
Hi all,
ok, I just instealled the dovecot 2.0.0 release, and the latest
mercurial pigeonhole source.
All is well, except for a particular sieve rule that may not be working
right.
It is a simple rule that looks like this
Hi all,
first of all I am new to the list, so hello everyone :)
I recently encountered an annoying problem with sieve, I am using dovecot
version 1.2.13 on centos 5.5, the packages installed are the following:
dovecot-sieve-0.1.17-5.el5
dovecot-managesieve-0.11.11-0_4.el5
On 21.8.2010, at 3.24, The Doctor wrote:
Aug 18 23:25:31 doctor dovecot: master: Warning: service(anvil):
process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped
I'm not really sure about this.. This still happens with the above
change? Anything else logged before it? Do you even have
On 21.8.2010, at 9.05, Luigi Rosa wrote:
The replica is done via dsync with a procedure like this executed on
mail1.acme.com server:
foreach mailbox {
dsync mirror mailbox
}
1) Use Linux user/group owner of the files and directories are the same on
both hosts (they are both
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:40:00PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.8.2010, at 3.24, The Doctor wrote:
Aug 18 23:25:31 doctor dovecot: master: Warning: service(anvil):
process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped
I'm not really sure about this.. This still happens with
Timo Sirainen said the following on 21/08/2010 14.54:
Maybe simply: dsync mirror -u u...@domain mail2.acme.com
Timo, thank you for all your answers. I will set up a replicated active-active
configuration in the following weeks and I will let you know if problems arise.
Ciao,
luigi
--
/
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:37 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file
mail-index-transaction.c:
line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
(seq = t-first_new_seq
Started looking into the dsync utility and the doc are seriously
incomplete. I can of course scour the internet looking for the missing
information but that doesn't fix the problem with the docs. I might try
to rewrite the docs myself once I figure it out.
On 21.8.2010, at 16.24, Marc Perkel wrote:
Started looking into the dsync utility and the doc are seriously incomplete.
I can of course scour the internet looking for the missing information but
that doesn't fix the problem with the docs. I might try to rewrite the docs
myself once I
On 8/21/2010 9:16 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.8.2010, at 16.24, Marc Perkel wrote:
Started looking into the dsync utility and the doc are seriously incomplete. I
can of course scour the internet looking for the missing information but that
doesn't fix the problem with the docs. I might
Dear All,
I am using dovecot-2.0.0 version and all my sieve
filters are working perfectly except the following one.
I am trying to flag message coming from jagd...@example.net mail id.
require
On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Piyush Joshi wrote:
Dear All,
I am using dovecot-2.0.0 version and all my sieve
filters are working perfectly except the following one.
I am trying to flag message coming from jagd...@example.net mail id.
require
[fileinto
,envelope
Hello, having difficulty setting up a 'secure-only' service on a
non-standard port.
Objective is to open a secure Dovecot service on an internet-visible
port, while also using an insecure service for hosts on an internal
network (so that one particular client which is not SSL/TLS-capable
can
On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have
the perspective of someone who never heard of it before and wondering
what is this?
Mark, is this another case of your absolute failure to even *try* to
google the
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have
the perspective of someone who never heard of it before and wondering
what is this?
On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Brandon Lamb wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have
the perspective of someone who
On 8/21/2010 11:00 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkelm...@perkel.com wrote:
When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have
the perspective of someone who never heard of it before and wondering
what is this?
Mark, is this another case of your
On 8/21/2010 11:00 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkelm...@perkel.com wrote:
When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have
the perspective of someone who never heard of it before and wondering
what is this?
Mark, is this another case of your
On 08/21/2010 09:58 PM Marc Perkel wrote:
Besides - the wiki has the same incomplete information as the man page.
Yeah, the wiki shows the manual page. ;-)
But now it's time to tell us, waht you are missing / what's incomplete.
(see also MID:f559a442-1e7f-4d78-a674-15e2843a3...@iki.fi)
On 2010-08-21 3:56 PM, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
You are missing the point. When documentation is done right then you
don't have to google it unless you are doing something tricky.
True - but 2.0 is brand new, so instead of posting to the list mostly a
vague complaint with a vague
23 matches
Mail list logo
