Re: [Dovecot] Wrong box.

2010-10-17 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 10/17/2010 04:20 AM, Henrique Fernandes wrote: Oct 16 22:52:42 mta0 dovecot: lda(luciano.more...@metal.eeimvr.uff.br): sieve: msgid=a04f508ac9d299a0733a09ce714ae...@localhost.localdomain: stored mail into mailbox 'luciano/more...@metal/eeimvr/uff/br' Oct 16 22:52:48 mta0 dovecot:

Re: [Dovecot] Quota, Postgres + Postfixadmin

2010-10-17 Thread Roman
On Thursday 14 October 2010 17:26:08 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 13:55 +0200, Roman wrote: quotadict = pgsql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-quota.conf After moving some mail on and off the account and finally cleaning out any mail (verified via console) quota2 looks like this:

Re: [Dovecot] Wrong box.

2010-10-17 Thread Henrique Fernandes
both is new, i did not recompile i use an package. I will try compile! Or reinstal Pigeonhole. Thanks! []'sf.rique On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote: On 10/17/2010 04:20 AM, Henrique Fernandes wrote: Oct 16 22:52:42 mta0 dovecot:

[Dovecot] maildir-dbox hybrid

2010-10-17 Thread Roland Stuehmer
Hi! How can I convert old mailboxes in maildir-dbox hybrid to a current dbox? I have a Dovecot installation that was upgraded from 1.2.x to 2.0.x. Having used the old convert plugin during the 1.2-times I am now stuck with mailboxes which are partially converted (maildir-dbox hybrid state). On

Re: [Dovecot] Wrong box.

2010-10-17 Thread Henrique Fernandes
I installed a new version and it worked! []'sf.rique On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.comwrote: both is new, i did not recompile i use an package. I will try compile! Or reinstal Pigeonhole. Thanks! []'sf.rique On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:10 AM,

Re: [Dovecot] maildir-dbox hybrid

2010-10-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 17.10.2010, at 17.52, Roland Stuehmer wrote: How can I convert old mailboxes in maildir-dbox hybrid to a current dbox? Does this help? http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/053012.html

[Dovecot] Retrieving unread message count

2010-10-17 Thread Brandon Davidson
Timo, I'm working with a webmail client that periodically polls unread message counts for a list of folders. It currently does this by doing a LIST or LSUB and then iterating across all of the folders, running a SEARCH ALL UNSEEN, and counting the resulting UID list. Eventually I'd like to see

Re: [Dovecot] Retrieving unread message count

2010-10-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 17.10.2010, at 23.49, Brandon Davidson wrote: Eventually I'd like to see it using RFC5819 LIST-EXTENDED, but that requires a fair bit of work. In the mean time I'm trying to speed up the existing iteration. I've got it working using 'STATUS mailbox (UNSEEN)', but the language in RFC3501

Re: [Dovecot] Retrieving unread message count

2010-10-17 Thread Brandon Davidson
Timo, On 10/17/10 3:56 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: The reason why STATUS is mentioned to be possibly slow is to discourage clients from doing a STATUS to all mailboxes. STATUS is definitely faster than SELECT+SEARCH with all IMAP servers. That's what I figured, thanks! Other than

Re: [Dovecot] Retrieving unread message count

2010-10-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 18.10.2010, at 0.19, Brandon Davidson wrote: Other than actually calling THREAD and counting the resulting groups, is there a good way to get a count of threads? Nope, that's the only way.

Re: [Dovecot] kmail-error: can't upload folder (imap-account on dovecot-server)

2010-10-17 Thread Christoph Knauer
Hey, it's a long time since all your answers, but at least I solved it: - update to etch-backports with all mail-related programms - dovecot-config with maildir After solving some other little problems my dovecot is running onto a fritz!box with freetz and debian etch :) Thanks to all who gave

Re: [Dovecot] Retrieving unread message count

2010-10-17 Thread Brandon Davidson
Timo, On 10/17/10 4:20 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 18.10.2010, at 0.19, Brandon Davidson wrote: Other than actually calling THREAD and counting the resulting groups, is there a good way to get a count of threads? Nope, that's the only way. It looks like