After many checks. Outlooks 2003 filters are running with this at
capability starts.
imap_capability = +I18NLEVEL=1 NAMESPACE
2010/11/10 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:32 +0100, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
Well, If I put all capabalities in the prelogin message, filters
On Dom, 2010-11-14 at 22:34 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
You're quite the enabler, Timo! Now any mail admin who tries to lecture
users on only sending attachments to those in-house personnel who really
need it, because otherwise it's wasteful of precious server storage
space, is going
On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:41 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 11/15/2010 2:17 AM, Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Nov 11, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Refreshed the ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.2/dovecot-1.2.16-managesieve-0.11.12.diff.gz
On 15.11.2010, at 12.34, Bruce Bodger wrote:
Nov 14 15:44:42 server dovecot[37024]: deliver(jjohnson): Module is for
different version 1.2.15: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_sieve_plugin.so
Nov 14 15:44:42 server dovecot[37024]: deliver(jjohnson): Fatal: Couldn't
load required plugins
On 15.11.2010, at 6.44, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
mail_location =
sdbox:/var/vmail/%d/%3n/%n/sdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%d/%3n/%n
/var/vmail is shared clustered filesystem with GFS2 shared by node1 and
node2
/var/indexes is a local filesystem at the node, so each node has his own
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 14 15:44:42 server dovecot[37024]: deliver(jjohnson): Module is
for different version 1.2.15: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda/
lib90_sieve_plugin.so
Nov 14 15:44:42 server dovecot[37024]: deliver(jjohnson): Fatal:
Couldn't load required
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 02:25 +0100, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
It seems, that while anvil has gained some verbosity,
Yes.
auth and imap-login (and maybe pop-login) seem to have lost their voice.
Is there any intention behind this or did I ran into a bug?
The bug was in a bit
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 10:31 -0600, Frank Collette IV wrote:
Error: stat(/var/run/dovecot) failed: Invalid argument
Fatal: Invalid configuration in /etc/dovecot.conf
That's strange. It just shouldn't ever happen. Try reinstalling Dovecot
or something.
I'm on dovecot 2.0.7 and I trying to building a customized auth plugin.
I take passdb-passwd-file.c and userdb-passwd-file.c to try to build
with a simple gcc comand out of dovecot environment as in example:
export DOVECOT=/path/to/untar/dovecot-2.0.7
gcc -fPIC -shared -g -Wall -I$DOVECOT \
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 11/15/2010 12:34 AM:
Now any mail admin who tries to lecture
users on only sending attachments to those in-house personnel who really
need it, because otherwise it's wasteful of precious server storage
space, is going to hear the response, Dude - don't stress out
On 15.11.2010, at 18.03, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
gcc -fPIC -shared -g -Wall -I$DOVECOT \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib-auth \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib-sql \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib-settings \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib-ntlm \
-I$DOVECOT/src/lib-master \
Hi,
I'm trying to convert a 33GB mail store from mbox to compressed mdbox
(largest mbox is 2.7GB). The source store is live, e.g. there are mails
delivered into it and mails are being read. Actually it is my own
mail. :)
Although my test runs were very successful I have run into trouble with
the
On 15.11.2010, at 18.15, Axel Thimm wrote:
dsync2.log.old1:dsync(user): Error: Next message unexpectedly lost from mbox
file /home/user/mail/lists/mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg-devel at 58706201 (cached)
dsync2.log.old1:dsync(user): Error: Next message unexpectedly lost from mbox
file
On 2010-11-15 1:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, the OP won't hear this from end users. They don't even know what
Dovecot is, will have never heard of it nor SIS.
The only folks he might take grief from is fellow sysadmins. But why
would they care?
Methinks it was a joke Stan... ;)
Also,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:06:40 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated:
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 11/15/2010 12:34 AM:
Now any mail admin who tries to lecture
users on only sending attachments to those in-house personnel who
really need it, because otherwise it's wasteful
Jerry put forth on 11/15/2010 12:47 PM:
Also, what if at some point management forces you to dump Dovecot and
move to a platform that doesn't offer SIS? If you change your tune
with said users now, in the future, you may have screwed yourself
after re-educating your users to the SIS way.
thanks for playing paley wiener spammer. GTFO
On 11/15/2010 02:24 PM, Radio Tron wrote:
http://aigipe.it/here.php
Should I set mmap_disable = yes when storing indexes in a GFS2 shared
filesystem??
2010/11/15 Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes alietsantieste...@gmail.com
Ok, I will create a LUN also as a shared clustered storage for indexes, any
consideration to have into account when the indexes are shared by
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:28:03 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated:
Jerry put forth on 11/15/2010 12:47 PM:
Also, what if at some point management forces you to dump Dovecot
and move to a platform that doesn't offer SIS? If you change your
tune with said users now, in
Read this in GFS2 docs:
mmap/splice support for journaled files (enabled by using the same on disk
format as for regular files)
...
2010/11/15 Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes alietsantieste...@gmail.com
Should I set mmap_disable = yes when storing indexes in a GFS2 shared
filesystem??
2010/11/15
Jerry put forth on 11/15/2010 2:26 PM:
I am not seeing where you got this self contradictory statements
from.
Then apparently you didn't read the thread. The OP told his users long
ago do this. Then he made a change and told them oh, you don't
really need to do that anymore. Then,
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 16:27 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Then apparently you didn't read the thread. The OP told his users long
ago do this. Then he made a change and told them [...]
No, he did not.
This thread lost its funny long ago. It started off quite amusing, the
first two posts have
You could try, but mmap_disable=yes might be faster (or might not).
On 15.11.2010, at 20.30, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
Read this in GFS2 docs:
mmap/splice support for journaled files (enabled by using the same on disk
format as for regular files)
...
2010/11/15 Aliet Santiesteban
On 2010-11-15 5:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The OP told his users long ago do this. Then he made a change and
told them oh, you don't really need to do that anymore. Then,
possibly, down the road, he tells them, oh, now you need to do it
the old way again.
Ummm... no, he didn't. Go back and
Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy? I.e. if my boxes typically have, say, 200 concurrent
POP3 connections and 600 IMAP connections, if I used
process_min_avail=50 for POP3
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:27:03 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated:
Jerry put forth on 11/15/2010 2:26 PM:
I am not seeing where you got this self contradictory statements
from.
Then apparently you didn't read the thread. The OP told his users
long ago do this. Then
On 15.11.2010, at 22.58, Mark Moseley wrote:
Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy?
The problem is that if there is any waiting for locks, all the other
connections hang
Stan Hoeppner schrieb:
[..]
I'm blowing nothing out of proportion. I simply made an observation. I
I think you might have, by now, noticed OPs the humour -- so I won't
stress it.
don't know about Europe, or anywhere else, but in American cusiness
culture, in general, most users either
Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy?
The problem is that if there is any waiting for locks, all the other
connections hang there as well waiting for it. Same for any type
Jerry put forth on 11/15/2010 5:00 PM:
I am not here to placate
the company's employees.
Whether you think so or not, you indeed are there to meet the needs of
the user base. A lot of SAs often learn this lesson too late. Without
users there is no need for your position. And that fact
Dennis Guhl put forth on 11/15/2010 5:23 PM:
I think you might have, by now, noticed OPs the humour -- so I won't
stress it.
I did. It was weak, but it was there. If you noticed, I responded to a
specific point within his post, not to the entire post. I was making a
serious point,
31 matches
Mail list logo
