Hi again, Timo:
On Viernes, 20 de Enero de 2012 20:16:01 Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 01/20/2012 06:24 PM, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
I'm having problems on a maildir due to dovecot returning an UID 0 to an
UID THREAD REFS command:
[...]
Could you instead send me such a mailbox where you can
Anyone?
W dniu 2012-01-10 10:34, l.chelchowski napisał(a):
Hi!
Please help me with this.
The problem exists when
quota-warning is executing:
LOG:
Jan 10 10:15:06 lmtp(85973):
Debug: none: root=, index=, control=,
inbox=, alt=
Jan 10 10:15:06
lmtp(85973): Info: Connect from local
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
server stops to receive emails. I think it sounds strange and I don't
understand why this happen any one can help me
Regards
On 2012-01-23 14:30, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7
server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my
mail
server stops to receive emails. I think it sounds strange and I don't
understand why this
* Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com:
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
server stops to receive emails.
That's normal.
I think it sounds strange and I don't
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 with dovecot-1.2.17-0_116.el5 on cento 5.7 server .
when I changed smtp port from 25 to 587 from postfix configuration my mail
server stops to receive emails.
That's normal.
I think it sounds
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not precisely correct...
You *could* use a router
On 2012-01-23 14:50, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not
Il giorno Mer 18 Gen 2012 15:56:41 CET, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
[...]
You're using SQL only for passdb lookup.
[...]
user_query isn't used, because you aren't using userdb sql.
Hi Timo,
thank you, I confirm everything you wrote. In order to help someone with
the same problem, when using
On 1/23/2012 8:38 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
You can't randomly change the port you receive mail on because
external MTAs have no way to find what port you're using. They will
*always* use port 25 and nothing else.
If your problem
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a
bit.
On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
over?
There's no
Timo Sirainen schreef op vr 20-01-2012 om 21:34 [+0200]:
On 20.1.2012, at 0.30, Harm Weites wrote:
we want to use dovecot LMTP for efficient mail delivery from our MX
servers (running postfix 2.8) to our storage servers (dovecot 2.0.17).
However, the one problem we see is the lack of
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if
On 23.1.2012, at 23.48, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
We have an imap-client (SOGo) that doesn't handle this status output while
searching:
* OK Searched 76% of the mailbox, ETA 0:50
Is there any way to disable this output on the dovecot-side?
No way to disable it without modifying
On 24.1.2012, at 0.19, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56:49PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No way to disable it without modifying code. I think SOGo should fix it
anyway..
Ok, thanks. SOGo will get fixed. I was just looking for a quick
workaround while we wait
I think a few people have complained about this combination being somewhat
broken, resulting in bogus cached message size wrong errors sometimes. This
fixes it:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/9b2931607063
18 matches
Mail list logo
