Hello,
In my current setup, I have a spam filter upstream that adds a
specific header - X-Spam-Level on every incoming mail. Based on this
level, the mail will be moved to the user spam folder using sieve by
doing fileinto :create 'spam';
Unfortunately, some legitimate email may end up in this
Hi,
On 15.3.2012, at 3.24, Jim Lawson wrote:
We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share
a clustered filesystem (GFS). All nodes run Dovecot 2.0.18.
..
Mar 14 20:40:38 imapdir2 dovecot: lmtp(10692): Panic: file
lmtp-proxy.c: line 376 (lmtp_proxy_output_timeout):
Send this to dovecot@dovecot.org, not dovecot-ow...@dovecot.org
On 14.3.2012, at 4.45, paul wrote:
HI. I have just started to play with sieve and everything seems ok
when
logging on using telnet localhost 4190 and an encoded
username/password.
If I try to connect with firefox at
Hi;
We are using scripts for login successes. Is there a feature for login
failed status or can it be developed?
Regards
--
*Aydın Demirel
Endersys Ltd.
Sistem Destek Mühendisi/ System Support Engineer*
*
*Endersys is the first Advanced Business Partner of Red Hat in Turkey!
On 2012-03-14 3:53 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
I'm not sure these are virtual users, so that link may have confused me.
All accounts on these servers have real unix accounts. Their inbox is
/var/spool/mail/unix-user-name.
Doesn't matter, the same thing applies... don't put
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:46 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've mostly finished a conversion from an old Centos 3 UW-Imap server to
a new Centos 6 dovecot server.
This is messy stuff to do. There are ways you could make Dovecot behave
identically to UW-IMAP (mail_full_filesystem_access=yes),
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:09 +0200, Aydın Demirel wrote:
We are using scripts for login successes. Is there a feature for login
failed status or can it be developed?
Login failures are only visible in auth and login processes. Probably
better to implement it in auth process. And there it
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 16:51 -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has any plugins for AV integration directly into
dovecot.
Our old pop servers have been scanning messges as they're moved from
new-cur in the inbox and, at least where user's aren't poping every
few seconds,
Op 3/15/2012 1:29 AM, paul schreef:
Send this to dovecot@dovecot.org, not dovecot-ow...@dovecot.org
On 14.3.2012, at 4.45, paul wrote:
HI. I have just started to play with sieve and everything seems ok when logging
on using telnet localhost 4190 and an encoded username/password. If I try to
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open INBOX:
Timeout while waiting for lock
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Couldn't open INBOX top=0/0,
retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0
Mar 15 09:47:26 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open INBOX:
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 11:44 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open INBOX:
Timeout while waiting for lock
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Couldn't open INBOX top=0/0,
retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0
during that time,
On 2012-03-01 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Get yourself a qualified network architect. Pay for a full network
traffic analysis. He'll attach sniffers at multiple points in your
network to gather traffic/error/etc data. Then you'll discuss the new
office, which
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 11:44 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open
INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Couldn't open INBOX
top=0/0, retr=0/0,
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:01 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open
INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Couldn't open INBOX
top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0
So one of
Op 3/15/2012 10:48 AM, Alexis Lelion schreef:
Hello,
In my current setup, I have a spam filter upstream that adds a
specific header - X-Spam-Level on every incoming mail. Based on this
level, the mail will be moved to the user spam folder using sieve by
doing fileinto :create 'spam';
On 2012-03-14 5:51 PM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
You misunderstood. I was referring to system cronjob's mail reports
from cron.daily jobs like security reports et al. Those reports
normally run at identical times.
But are these really 'duplicate' mails? It sounds to me
On 3/14/2012 7:33 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com writes:
Their imap folders, the ones that they create using an imap client or
webmail, are either in ~ or ~/mail. Their original .mailboxlist is
always in ~. Based on that, I should probably copy any imap folders
Hello Stephan,
Thanks for your answer, and sorry for forgetting to specify which
dovecot version I was using :-/
I'm using Dovecot 2.0.15, with PigeonHole.
The syntax issues are some typos I made while writing this email, I
double checked, and indeed, my production script was slightly
different
On 3/15/12 6:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hi,
On 15.3.2012, at 3.24, Jim Lawson wrote:
We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share
a clustered filesystem (GFS). All nodes run Dovecot 2.0.18.
..
Mar 14 20:40:38 imapdir2 dovecot: lmtp(10692): Panic: file
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:01 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Error: Couldn't open
INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock
Mar 15 09:46:11 postamt dovecot: pop3(username): Couldn't open INBOX
top=0/0,
On 3/15/2012 6:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:46 -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've mostly finished a conversion from an old Centos 3 UW-Imap server to
a new Centos 6 dovecot server.
This is messy stuff to do. There are ways you could make Dovecot behave
identically to
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 21:36 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 8.3.2012, at 21.18, Markus Petri wrote:
after upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I noticed that I could not use
shared folders with mutt anymore. 2.1 lists the shared namespace prefix
once per user sharing an folder in LIST %.
I
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 07:50 -0400, Jim Lawson wrote:
On 3/15/12 6:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hi,
On 15.3.2012, at 3.24, Jim Lawson wrote:
We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share
a clustered filesystem (GFS). All nodes run Dovecot 2.0.18.
..
Mar 14
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 00:32 +, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
Thanks for this patch. I've applied it to the dovecot-20120303
nightly snapshot. The good news is, compilation works fine.
The bad news is, the libraries and binaries don't work because
they don't find the custom SSL libraries.
..
Hi all,
dovecot supports systemd socket activation. Together with standard unit
activation (like old sysv init script), there are two ways how to
configure dovecot(only interface:port, not whole configuration). This
can result in situation where those configurations does not say the
same.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:22:11 +0200
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Also Dovecot probably should add \Noselect, especially if the
mailbox isn't really selectable (there's some weirdness between
shared/user being equal to shared/user/INBOX, but I'm not sure what
to do about it).
These
Hi --
On 15.03.2012 12:21, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-14 5:51 PM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de
wrote:
You misunderstood. I was referring to system cronjob's mail reports
from cron.daily jobs like security reports et al. Those reports
normally run at identical times.
But
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 18:01 -0800, Joseph Tam wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Timo Sirainen writes:
I would like to run various doveadm commands that involves all (mail)
users like
doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d
but any doveadm command that uses -A to iterate
On 2012-03-15 9:46 AM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
Thus, at 3:01 one report from mx1 will be delivered at mx1 into mailfolder
REPORTS and at 3:01 one report from mx2 will be delivered at mx2 into the
mailfolder REPORTS. Important: both mails are different but they arrive
in
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 14:34 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
What exactly should happen when
dovecot.conf does not match dovecot.socket configuration?
Dovecot's systemd code was written by one of you Redhat guys. I had some
similar thoughts when I applied the patch, but didn't really know what
to
On 3/15/2012 12:42 PM, Alexis Lelion wrote:
Hello Stephan,
Thanks for your answer, and sorry for forgetting to specify which
dovecot version I was using :-/
I'm using Dovecot 2.0.15, with PigeonHole.
The syntax issues are some typos I made while writing this email, I
double checked, and
Hi --
On 15.03.2012 15:04, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-15 9:46 AM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de
wrote:
Thus, at 3:01 one report from mx1 will be delivered at mx1 into
mailfolder
REPORTS and at 3:01 one report from mx2 will be delivered at mx2
into the
mailfolder REPORTS.
Thanks for this useful information, I will give it a try
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 3/15/2012 12:42 PM, Alexis Lelion wrote:
Hello Stephan,
Thanks for your answer, and sorry for forgetting to specify which
dovecot version I was using :-/
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig
There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You
should now be able to do pretty much anything you want with Dovecot
proxy/director.
This release also includes the
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.19.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.19.tar.gz.sig
Hopefully one of the last v2.0.x releases.
- IMAP: ENABLE CONDSTORE/QRESYNC + STATUS for a mailbox might not
have seen latest external changes to it, like new mails.
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1):
1) src/lib-index/mail-cache-fields.c
(comparison between two last_used fields)
On 15.3.2012, at 18.04, Tom Talpey wrote:
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1):
Thanks, fixed in hg. I guess I should add x86 vm
On Mac OS X 10.5.8 / darwin 9.8.0, I'm getting this error on startup again:
dovecot[74267]: master: Fatal: kevent(EV_ADD, READ, 19) failed: Invalid argument
dovecot.conf contains:
service stats {
fifo_listener stats-mail {
mode = 0
}
}
which fixed the issue with 2.1.1
adding the
Hello, excuse me but there is some documentation about replication now?
I dont' understand where i must put the lines below (dovecot.conf? , 20-imap?)
Excuse but it's not so clear for me cause i'm a new dovecot user.
Another question, i use virtual users on mysql backend , so for
replication i
Hi --
On 15.03.2012, at 17:42, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Hello, excuse me but there is some documentation about replication now?
Not that I'm aware of.
I dont' understand where i must put the lines below (dovecot.conf? ,
20-imap?)
You can put them wherever you wish, as long as you include
Hi, thank's a lot! for your detailed answer.
About ssh (excuse for my english) i think you correctly understand
what is my problem
with virtual user (i have no system user ) and there are not ssh
account. So i must use a dedicate account for replication (ssh)
that must act sync for all virtual
On 3/15/12 8:25 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 07:50 -0400, Jim Lawson wrote:
On 3/15/12 6:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hi,
On 15.3.2012, at 3.24, Jim Lawson wrote:
We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share
a clustered filesystem (GFS). All
Hi --
On 15.03.2012, at 18:16, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
with virtual user (i have no system user ) and there are not ssh
account. So i must use a dedicate account for replication (ssh)
that must act sync for all virtual mail account.
Yes, that's what I use. I did create a dedicated account for
The day I switched to the new replicator/dsync technique, those
duplicates
are history, but I'm still able to produce duplicates (and multiples)
if
Hello,
Can you get a little bit more in details about this replicator/dsync
techique? As my main problem is that EVERYTHING (that gets created
On 15.3.2012, at 19.23, Jim Lawson wrote:
I'm almost certain that v2.1.1 talks compatible protocol with v2.0. The
current hg version has some extra features, but it doesn't use them
until all of the directors have upgraded to the new version.
Trying with v2.1.2 (peer is v2.0.18):
Mar 15
On 15.3.2012, at 19.49, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Can you get a little bit more in details about this replicator/dsync
techique? As my main problem is that EVERYTHING (that gets created on
different servers in the same time) gets duplicated.
I only do replication using the doveadm sync
On 3/15/12 1:52 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.3.2012, at 19.23, Jim Lawson wrote:
I'm almost certain that v2.1.1 talks compatible protocol with v2.0. The
current hg version has some extra features, but it doesn't use them
until all of the directors have upgraded to the new version.
Trying
Hi, yes it'a good idea but i'm using now root i hope this not invalid all
I obtain this error but maybe i need some pause
Mar 15 18:55:28 Gentoo_cyrus_imap dovecot:
dsync-local(matteo@netlite.locale): Error: remote: bash: doveadm:
command not found
Mar 15 18:55:28 Gentoo_cyrus_imap dovecot:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject line
probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using dovecot as my imap/pop server due to
upgrading 3 versions of OS on my mail servers. So far, that's not bad.
What surprises me is that one of the first
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using dovecot as my imap/pop server due to
upgrading 3 versions of OS on my mail servers. So far, that's not bad.
On 3/15/2012 5:51 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-01 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Get yourself a qualified network architect. Pay for a full network
traffic analysis. He'll attach sniffers at multiple points in your
network to gather traffic/error/etc data. Then
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:53:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig
There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You
should now be able to do pretty much
On 15.3.2012, at 21.48, l...@airstreamcomm.net l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
Are there any performance metrics around dsync replication, such as how
many users this has been tested on, or how long the replication take to
occur?
The performance isn't optimal yet. You can probably replicate
On 3/15/2012 12:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.3.2012, at 18.04, Tom Talpey wrote:
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1):
On 15/03/2012 19:27, Terry Carmen wrote:
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using dovecot as my imap/pop server due to
upgrading 3 versions of OS on
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:27:37 -0400
Terry Carmen articulated:
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using dovecot as my imap/pop server due
to
On 14.03.2012 20:33, wrote e-frog:
On 14.03.2012 14:41, wrote Timo Sirainen:
With latest hg version it should work.
Hi Timo,
The can't delete mailbox INBOX error is gone now with changeset
c077ca9bc306 and it's working successfully on the account from yesterday
where it also worked with
Hi --
On 15.03.2012, at 18:57, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Hi, yes it'a good idea but i'm using now root i hope this not
invalid all
Actually it's a bad idea to use root for ssh from a security point
of view. A hacked root account isn't fun. Thus, normally one needs
to explicitly change the
Hi --
On 15.03.2012, at 18:49, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Can you get a little bit more in details about this replicator/dsync
techique?
http://blog.dovecot.org/2012/02/dovecot-clustering-with-dsync-based.html
and
http://www.dovecot.org/img/dsync-director-replication-ssh.png
helped me a lot
On 15.3.2012, at 21.06, Steve Campbell wrote:
The one thing I'm a little critical of, though, is that trying to make heads
or tails of dovecot by following the online documentation is a little
problematic. I'm constantly jumping to another page and then back to the
original page, and for
On 15.3.2012, at 22.48, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 15.03.2012, at 18:57, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Hi, yes it'a good idea but i'm using now root i hope this not
invalid all
Actually it's a bad idea to use root for ssh from a security point
of view. A hacked root account isn't fun. Thus,
On 3/15/12 4:46 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:27:37 -0400
Terry Carmen articulated:
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using dovecot as
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
$ patch -p1 -s ../dovecot-20120303-e540404debb7.patch
$ env SSL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/ssl/include SSL_LIBS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib
-Wl,-R/usr/local/ssl/lib -lcrypto -lssl ./configure
--prefix=/usr/local/Dovecot-20120303 --with-ssl=openssl
* Jerry dovecot@dovecot.org:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:27:37 -0400
Terry Carmen articulated:
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into using
in ~privilgeduser/.ssh/authorized keys:
from=list of hosts key is valid for cmd=dsync.sh pubkey...
On 03/15/2012 05:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Then again it's safer to use system user accounts than a single vmail
account that has access to everyone's emails. And if you allow ssh
login only
Hello Timo,
I have update the repository with hg pull -u, recompiled and redeployed
and somehow the dovecot -n still shows 2.1.1... :(
I ran exactly the same test: starting for 1 clean user1, I create 2
emails, one on mx1.a and one on mx2.a and I sync them with doveadm.
The output is exactly as
Plus the scripts that
1) when calling ssh dsync first writes the username to stdout (before dsync
starts communicating)
and
2) dsync.sh on remote first reads the username from stdin, before execing dsync
itself
Because it's not possible to give -u $username parameter in the authorized_keys
On 3/15/2012 9:23 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 3/15/2012 12:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.3.2012, at 18.04, Tom Talpey wrote:
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide
those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I
hello,
So I upgraded to 2.1.2 (not from repository because that one still says
2.1.1, but from the release).
I ran exactly the same test with exactly the same behaviour. (new account,
synced successfully on 2 servers, deliver 1 email to each server, run
doveadm sync)...
Please find below the
On 01/28/2012 12:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.1.2012, at 2.00, Gedalya wrote:
Starting program: /usr/bin/doveadm -o imapc_user=j...@example.com -o
imapc_password= backup -u j...@example.com -R imapc:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
mailbox_log_iter_open_next
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 16:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig
There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You
should now be able to do pretty much anything you
Quoting Jerry je...@seibercom.net:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:27:37 -0400
Terry Carmen articulated:
On 03/15/2012 03:06 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Firstly, this isn't meant to be critical, and I realize the subject
line probably suggest criticism, so...
I was sort of forced into
72 matches
Mail list logo
