Am 2015-07-02 um 01:41 schrieb Laz C. Peterson:
I did attempt to switch the PAM/Kerberos authentication to Dovecot
LDAP authentication, but now performance is unbelievably slow.
Any thoughts to this?
In case you have multiple passdb backends, it could be, that LDAP only
gets its chance,
Hi Laz,
I’m just wondering… why are you using LDAP and/or PAM to access the MySQL
server? If also the password is stored in the db you could use MySQL directly?
Because then you could use password_query and user_query to actually split the
provided email address into name and domain parts.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Daniel Tröder wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb jjhoffart:
Hello,
I am in the process of setting up a server that is running to
invocations of dovecot. One of the invocations is acting as a backend and the
other as
Am 02.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb jjhoffart:
Hello,
I am in the process of setting up a server that is running to
invocations of dovecot. One of the invocations is acting as a backend and the
other as a Director. I believe I have most of the configuration complete but
I keep running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Jim Garrison wrote:
I have some local users and some Postfix virtual mailboxes. The config
currently has:
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
passdb {
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, 刘莹莹 wrote:
sometimes i can't use imap command to get mails, when this problem appear i
find out the file dovecot-uidlist.lock appear at the same time . I don't know
Why is this happening ? can you help me ?
+ post the
hi:
sometimes i can't use imap command to get mails, when this problem appear i
find out the file dovecot-uidlist.lock appear at the same time . I don't know
Why is this happening ? can you help me ?
thanks !
Unfortunately disabling antivirus did not help.
I also set IMAP on 143 TLS, removed Root folder path and left everything
unchecked in outlook delete.
Emails are still not fetching.
Any other ideas ?
Pacher Dragos
-Original Message-
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org]
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:16:06 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
I also set IMAP on 143 TLS, removed Root folder path and left everything
unchecked in outlook delete.
Emails are still not fetching.
Any other ideas ?
Have you use any other MUA to download emails prior to Outlook? Is any other
MUA
Peter,
Yes that is a possibility. I will try disabling PAM (or switching the auth
order) and see if that makes a difference. Thanks for the suggestion!
~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
Ph: 951.319.3240 x201
On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:34 PM, Peter Chiochetti p...@myzel.net wrote:
Am 2015-07-02 um
Hello,
i use dovecot 2.2.18 and do some tests with an utf8 mysqlbackend.
I use MySQL to authenticate Users and for retrieving some individual
settings like autocreating folders etc. by userdb-settings in user-query.
Yet no problems with standard language. Now i try to provide
userdb-settings
On 05/04/15 17:45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 04 May 2015, at 16:59, Nagy, Attila b...@fsn.hu wrote:
Hi,
On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila b...@fsn.hu wrote:
Hi,
imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it
works even
Ahh Peter, good call on this one!
beating head into deskpausebeating head into desk againthumbs up
So after playing around with the order of authentication in Dovecot, you are
correct, the PAM timeout was causing the holdup. I guess since PAM has no way
of looking up whether or not a user
dovecot -n
log_path: /var/log/maillog
protocols: pop3 pop3s imap imaps bport
ssl_cert_file: /etc/pki/NSMail/SSL.cert
ssl_key_file: /etc/pki/NSMail/SSL.key
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
Hello,
first post in 3 years, kinda shows how painless Dovecot is. ^o^
Also this isn't really a dovecot issue, alas it's involved and since there
are some large scale implementations of it I hope somebody here has some
insights I might have missed.
Currently we're running this setup:
1. LVS
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:05:43 +0200 Urban Loesch wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer:
2. Here is where the fun starts.
Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox server needs a
port for the outgoing connection.
So to support 2 million sessions we
Hi,
Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer:
2. Here is where the fun starts.
Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox server needs a
port for the outgoing connection.
So to support 2 million sessions we need 40 IP addresses here. Ouch.
And from a brief test having
17 matches
Mail list logo
